LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2023, 01:10 PM   #1546
glennmcc
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2021
Location: North Jackson, Ohio (USA)
Distribution: slackware64-15.0
Posts: 526

Rep: Reputation: 304Reputation: 304Reputation: 304Reputation: 304

My apologies to all.

I was under the impression that "OIC" was universally known to be "Oh, I see"

Obviously, I was wrong.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-07-2023, 01:14 PM   #1547
kjhambrick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib
Posts: 2,159

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
Dang !

And I thought it meant Inversion of Control

-- kjh
 
Old 01-07-2023, 03:08 PM   #1548
dhalliwe
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2022
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 163

Rep: Reputation: 154Reputation: 154
Quote:
OIC
Email from mother to daughter:

I keep seeing all these acronyms. Can you tell me what IDK, TTYL, and ILY mean?

Email from daughter to mother:

I don't know. Talk to you later. I love you.

Return email from mother:

OK. Thanks anyway. I'll ask your sister and see if she knows.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-08-2023, 08:59 AM   #1549
Paulo2
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 (started with 13.37). Testing -current in a spare partition.
Posts: 932

Rep: Reputation: 520Reputation: 520Reputation: 520Reputation: 520Reputation: 520Reputation: 520
'wtf' knows all those
Code:
wtf oic idk ttyl ily
OIC: oh, I see
IDK: I don't know
TTYL: talk to you later
ILY: I love you
ps- according to 'wtf', wtf means "where's the food"
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-08-2023, 04:11 PM   #1550
dcb_tahoe
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2016
Distribution: Slackware , Mint , Ubuntu
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
In my 14.2 to 15.0 quest ...

One of my needs is for slackware 15.0 to be a samba member server . I have yet to be able to do a net join to my win ads domain ... this is working with mint21 ,...

I've been stumped for days ... I cant get winbind to run ...

Any thread or pointers would be appreciated ...

Should I Build it over from scratch ?

Should I dig a deeper hole by building it as its own ads ?

Very frustrated !

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/art...hite-paper.pdf

Last edited by dcb_tahoe; 01-09-2023 at 11:23 PM.
 
Old 01-08-2023, 06:37 PM   #1551
reddog83
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2018
Distribution: Slackware 15.0/Current
Posts: 457

Rep: Reputation: 236Reputation: 236Reputation: 236
libnma-1.10.6
Quote:
=======================================
libnma-1.10.6
Overview of changes since libnma-1.10.4
=======================================

* Fix the path and translation domains of GSchema files.
* Removed strings that don't match our conscious language standards from
the translation files.
* Added autoptr support.
* Fix translations of country and territory names in the mobile broadband
dialog.
* Honor explicitly set APN if provider was not present in the mobile
broadband dialog.
* Make sure Kosovar operators are ordered properly in the mobile broadband
dialog.

=======================================
libnma-1.10.4
Overview of changes since libnma-1.10.2
=======================================

* Fix build with Gcr 3.92 pre-release
* Split org.gnome.nm-applet.eap GSchema from org.gnome.nm-applet, so that
the latter can be provided by network-manager-applet again (where it
belongs).
https://download.gnome.org/sources/l...-1.10.6.tar.xz
https://download.gnome.org/sources/l...10.6.sha256sum
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-08-2023, 06:37 PM   #1552
drgibbon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2014
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 1,221

Rep: Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943Reputation: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyCyborg View Post
And what you guys will do if @zerouno comes back in a bright day, just to tell "I was hired by Microsoft. So long and thanks for all fish!" ???

You will kiss goodbye the multiple repositories support on slackpkg ?
I expect slackpkg+ will keep working without any code updates for quite a long time (the current problem with slakfinder.org only affects updates to slackpkg+ itself, any other configured repos still work). Also it's completely possible for someone else to take over maintenance of the code in case zerouno is unwilling or unable to.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-08-2023, 07:09 PM   #1553
reddog83
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2018
Distribution: Slackware 15.0/Current
Posts: 457

Rep: Reputation: 236Reputation: 236Reputation: 236
at-spi2-core 2.47.1
Quote:
What's new in at-spi2-core 2.47.1:
* The meson options -Dx11 and -Dintrospection are now implemented with
meson features - https://mesonbuild.com/Build-options.html#features

Instead of accepting values of "yes/no/auto", they take
"enabled/disabled/auto". Please change your build scripts
accordingly if you use these options.

* Use gi-docgen to generate documentation.

* Register key grabs using the focused window, rather than the root window.
This should prevent the window from losing focus when a key grab is used.

* atk-adaptor: Handle sockets in GetChildren.

* Improve documentation of the dbus interfaces.

* Various code clean-ups. Some unused code has been removed.
https://download.gnome.org/sources/a...-2.47.1.tar.xz
https://download.gnome.org/sources/a...47.1.sha256sum
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-09-2023, 07:01 AM   #1554
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,062

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
No need to check btrfs file systems at boot time.

Rationale in the attached patch, based on untarred http://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackwa..._initrd.tar.gz at time of writing.
Attached Files
File Type: txt do_not_check_btrfs_fs.txt (2.1 KB, 4 views)

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 01-09-2023 at 09:46 AM. Reason: bad patch corrected, thanks to Allend
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-09-2023, 08:13 AM   #1555
drumz
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 906

Rep: Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier View Post
Rationale in the attached patch, based on untarred http://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackwa..._initrd.tar.gz at time of writing.
I think that patch is small enough to put in CODE blocks for others to review without downloading:

Code:
Rationale: let's quote of "FSCK.BTRFS(8)":
> Traditional filesystems need to run their respective fsck utility in case the filesystem was not
> unmounted cleanly and the log needs to be replayed before  mount.  This  is        not needed for
> BTRFS. You should set fs_passno to 0.

To confirm in /etc/fstab of a recent openSUSE system:

UUID=f1a46e7c-0d1f-49e6-b898-d6c960e4760b  /  btrfs  defaults  0  0

Additionally, it would not hurt at all to name the devices by UUID, but I digress.

Didier Spaier
Monday 09 January 2023

diff -ru usr/lib/setup/SeTpartitions usr.new/lib/setup/SeTpartitions
--- usr/lib/setup/SeTpartitions	2019-01-22 23:07:33.000000000 +0100
+++ usr.new/lib/setup/SeTpartitions	2023-01-09 13:29:12.072838146 +0100
@@ -399,7 +399,11 @@
 mount $ROOT_DEVICE $T_PX -t $ROOT_SYS_TYPE 1> $REDIR 2> $REDIR
 
 #echo "$ROOT_DEVICE       /        $ROOT_SYS_TYPE        defaults   1   1" > $TMP/SeTnative
-printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$ROOT_DEVICE" "/" "$ROOT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "1" > $TMP/SeTnative
+if [ "$ROOT_SYS_TYPE" = "btrfs" ]; then
+  printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$ROOT_DEVICE" "/" "$ROOT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "0" "0" > $TMP/SeTnative
+else
+  printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$ROOT_DEVICE" "/" "$ROOT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "1" > $TMP/SeTnative
+fi
 echo $ROOT_DEVICE > $TMP/SeTrootdev
 
 # done mounting the target root partition
@@ -530,7 +534,11 @@
       mount $NEXT_PARTITION ${T_PX}/$MTPT -t $NEXT_SYS_TYPE 1> $REDIR 2> $REDIR
 
       #echo "$NEXT_PARTITION       $MTPT      $NEXT_SYS_TYPE        defaults   1   1" >> $TMP/SeTnative
-      printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "2" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      if [ "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" = "btrfs" ]; then
+        printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "0" "0" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      else
+        printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "0" "0" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      fi
    done # next partition loop
 fi # more than one Linux partition
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-09-2023, 08:40 AM   #1556
allend
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 6,376

Rep: Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756Reputation: 2756
Should that not read?
Code:
@@ -530,7 +534,11 @@
       mount $NEXT_PARTITION ${T_PX}/$MTPT -t $NEXT_SYS_TYPE 1> $REDIR 2> $REDIR
 
       #echo "$NEXT_PARTITION       $MTPT      $NEXT_SYS_TYPE        defaults   1   1" >> $TMP/SeTnative
-      printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "2" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      if [ "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" = "btrfs" ]; then
+        printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "0" "0" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      else
+        printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "2" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      fi
    done # next partition loop
 fi # more than one Linux partition

Last edited by allend; 01-09-2023 at 08:42 AM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-09-2023, 09:28 AM   #1557
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,062

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by allend View Post
Should that not read?
Code:
@@ -530,7 +534,11 @@
       mount $NEXT_PARTITION ${T_PX}/$MTPT -t $NEXT_SYS_TYPE 1> $REDIR 2> $REDIR
 
       #echo "$NEXT_PARTITION       $MTPT      $NEXT_SYS_TYPE        defaults   1   1" >> $TMP/SeTnative
-      printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "2" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      if [ "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" = "btrfs" ]; then
+        printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "0" "0" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      else
+        printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "2" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      fi
    done # next partition loop
  fi # more than one Linux partition
Indeed, thanks for the heads-up. Corrected patch below.
Code:
Rationale: let's quote of "FSCK.BTRFS(8)":
> Traditional filesystems need to run their respective fsck utility in case the filesystem was not
> unmounted cleanly and the log needs to be replayed before  mount.  This  is        not needed for
> BTRFS. You should set fs_passno to 0.

To confirm in /etc/fstab of a recent openSUSE system:

UUID=f1a46e7c-0d1f-49e6-b898-d6c960e4760b  /  btrfs  defaults  0  0

Additionally, it would not hurt at all to name the devices by UUID, but I digress.

Didier Spaier
Monday 09 January 2023

diff -ru usr/lib/setup/SeTpartitions usr.new/lib/setup/SeTpartitions
--- usr/lib/setup/SeTpartitions    2019-01-22 23:07:33.000000000 +0100
+++ usr.new/lib/setup/SeTpartitions    2023-01-09 13:29:12.072838146 +0100
@@ -399,7 +399,11 @@
 mount $ROOT_DEVICE $T_PX -t $ROOT_SYS_TYPE 1> $REDIR 2> $REDIR
 
 #echo "$ROOT_DEVICE       /        $ROOT_SYS_TYPE        defaults   1   1" > $TMP/SeTnative
-printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$ROOT_DEVICE" "/" "$ROOT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "1" > $TMP/SeTnative
+if [ "$ROOT_SYS_TYPE" = "btrfs" ]; then
+  printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$ROOT_DEVICE" "/" "$ROOT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "0" "0" > $TMP/SeTnative
+else
+  printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$ROOT_DEVICE" "/" "$ROOT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "1" > $TMP/SeTnative
+fi
 echo $ROOT_DEVICE > $TMP/SeTrootdev
 
 # done mounting the target root partition
@@ -530,7 +534,11 @@
       mount $NEXT_PARTITION ${T_PX}/$MTPT -t $NEXT_SYS_TYPE 1> $REDIR 2> $REDIR
 
       #echo "$NEXT_PARTITION       $MTPT      $NEXT_SYS_TYPE        defaults   1   1" >> $TMP/SeTnative
-      printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "2" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      if [ "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" = "btrfs" ]; then
+        printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "0" "0" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      else
+        printf "%-16s %-16s %-11s %-16s %-3s %s\n" "$NEXT_PARTITION" "$MTPT" "$NEXT_SYS_TYPE" "defaults" "1" "2" >> $TMP/SeTnative
+      fi
    done # next partition loop
 fi # more than one Linux partition
PS I have also corrected the attachment

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 01-09-2023 at 09:32 AM. Reason: PS added.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-10-2023, 01:46 AM   #1558
RadicalDreamer
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2016
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware64-Current
Posts: 1,816

Rep: Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by drgibbon View Post
I expect slackpkg+ will keep working without any code updates for quite a long time (the current problem with slakfinder.org only affects updates to slackpkg+ itself, any other configured repos still work). Also it's completely possible for someone else to take over maintenance of the code in case zerouno is unwilling or unable to.
I bet alienbob will do "maintenance of the code" if it needs it or someone will, but I still believe slackpkg+ (with or without commented out third party mirrors) should be a part of Slackware proper! slackpkg+ is a very useful and important extension to slackpkg. It is about as important as slackpkg. It provides an easy way for people like alienbob to share their third party repositories with the Slackware community. I think adding it to Slackware is a no-brainer, but others probably disagree. I'm dropping my advocacy for it being officially added to Slackware because I don't want to junk up this thread, but I feel confident that it should be added to Slackware. I wish zerouno the best!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-10-2023, 04:02 PM   #1559
USUARIONUEVO
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,338

Rep: Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930
Hi , from the last changelog

ca-certificates

when using installpkg with a --root parameter

and when upgrade ???? upgradepkg no respect --root or ROOT= to make the doinst tasks.

Ok for installpkg but in the next upgradepkg ... mmm error cause the upgradepkg no respect --root or ROOT=

Need to patch upgradepkg or in the doinst put $ROOT , or something , i think patch only installpkg is mid solution to the real problem.
 
Old 01-10-2023, 04:40 PM   #1560
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,387

Rep: Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108Reputation: 4108
Quote:
Originally Posted by USUARIONUEVO View Post
Hi , from the last changelog

ca-certificates

when using installpkg with a --root parameter

and when upgrade ???? upgradepkg no respect --root or ROOT= to make the doinst tasks.

Ok for installpkg but in the next upgradepkg ... mmm error cause the upgradepkg no respect --root or ROOT=

Need to patch upgradepkg or in the doinst put $ROOT , or something , i think patch only installpkg is mid solution to the real problem.
Hi, USUARIONUEVO

Have you looked at what /sbin/upgradepkg actually does?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apache 2.4 requests to non-SSL site with "Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1" and no trailing / get redirected to default site owendelong Linux - Server 2 06-22-2021 02:08 PM
[SOLVED] Requests for -current (20151216) rworkman Slackware 3441 12-28-2017 03:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration