LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2023, 05:29 AM   #1576
Lanius
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2022
Location: Poland
Distribution: OpenSUSE MicroOS
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 23

I guess I will just keep rebuilding Vim for myself.

Thanks for your response. (:
 
Old 01-13-2023, 07:22 AM   #1577
drumz
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 906

Rep: Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanius View Post
I need Vim built with +clipboard, and without that I cannot copy to or (more importantly) from Vim to system clipboard. I feel it's not that unique use case unless I'm missing something here.

Gvim is GUI for Vim, it doesn't change the fact that it hasn't the mentioned build option.
Code:
$ grep vim ~/.profile
[ -n "$DISPLAY" ] && alias vim="gvim -v"
export VISUAL=vim
export EDITOR=vim
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-13-2023, 11:43 AM   #1578
Paulo2
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 (started with 13.37). Testing -current in a spare partition.
Posts: 932

Rep: Reputation: 522Reputation: 522Reputation: 522Reputation: 522Reputation: 522Reputation: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanius View Post
I need Vim built with +clipboard, and without that I cannot copy to or (more importantly) from Vim to system clipboard. I feel it's not that unique use case unless I'm missing something here.

Gvim is GUI for Vim, it doesn't change the fact that it hasn't the mentioned build option.
Do you mean running vim in a terminal like konsole, xterm, xfce? I don't know how to do this in a text console.

It works, at least with Xfce clipboard.
Copy from vim to clipboard: press <shift> and select the text with mouse+left button pressed
directly over the text. Without <shift> key, vim will interpret as visual selection.

Copy from clipboard to vim: enter insert mode and paste the text from the clipboard with <ctrl+shift+v>
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-13-2023, 11:54 AM   #1579
Lanius
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2022
Location: Poland
Distribution: OpenSUSE MicroOS
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulo2 View Post
Do you mean running vim in a terminal like konsole, xterm, xfce? I don't know how to do this in a text console.

It works, at least with Xfce clipboard.
Copy from vim to clipboard: press <shift> and select the text with mouse+left button pressed
directly over the text. Without <shift> key, vim will interpret as visual selection.

Copy from clipboard to vim: enter insert mode and paste the text from the clipboard with <ctrl+shift+v>
Running gvim with -v option solves the issue, since it's compiled with clipboard support, I simply thought it just runs GUI for Vim. But good to know nonetheless.
 
Old 01-14-2023, 02:23 AM   #1580
marrowsuck
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Posts: 202

Rep: Reputation: 89
An update to the most recent Cython in current would be nice -- an upgrade is needed for numpy.
https://pypi.org/project/Cython/
0.29.33 is out and plays nice with current.

Last edited by marrowsuck; 01-14-2023 at 12:16 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-14-2023, 08:22 AM   #1581
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,393

Rep: Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119
KDE Frameworks 5.102.0

Announcements:
https://kde.org/announcements/frameworks/5/5.102.0/
 
Old 01-14-2023, 08:25 PM   #1582
ZhaoLin1457
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,028

Rep: Reputation: 1216Reputation: 1216Reputation: 1216Reputation: 1216Reputation: 1216Reputation: 1216Reputation: 1216Reputation: 1216Reputation: 1216
Quote:
Originally Posted by marav View Post
KDE Frameworks 5.102.0

Announcements:
https://kde.org/announcements/frameworks/5/5.102.0/
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they say that 5.101 will be the last release for KF5 and after that they move to KF6?
 
Old 01-15-2023, 04:05 AM   #1583
Windu
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Distribution: Arch Linux, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 593

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZhaoLin1457 View Post
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they say that 5.101 will be the last release for KF5 and after that they move to KF6?
You could have looked for it, it is public information:

Code:
5.101	Sat December 3, 2022	Sat December 10, 2022	
5.102	Sat January 7, 2023	(expected) Sat January 14, 2023	
Until further notice: tagging happens the first Saturday of every month, and the public release is one week later.

Frameworks 5.101 (December 2022) is the last KF5 release with feature development, there will be more releases after that for maintenance (e.g. bug fixes), but with increasing intervals as the amount of changes decreases
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-15-2023, 09:16 PM   #1584
HQuest
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Location: 2001:470:c2d0::/56
Distribution: Anything I can interface with
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by HQuest View Post
Can we also start looking at upgrading OpenSSL to the more modern v3.0? For the record, v1.1.1 support will end in September 2023. From https://www.openssl.org/source/:
I started to tinker around and was able to get a ton of n/ based systems operational with OpenSSL 3.0.7 running this past few weeks with zero identified problems. Apps such as bind, krb5, openldap, openssh, sendmail (yes, the ancient sendmail), vsftpd, wget, to name a few. The process is pretty painless, assuming no circular requirements (such as krb5 using openldap libs and vice versa) and the provider component compiled with OpenSSL v3 support. Minor adjustments were required in some tools (such as removing a -Werror flag from vsftpd's Makefile), only because deprecated function warnings were added into OpenSSL v3 headers.

The two OpenSSL versions can coexist in the same system, making migration easier and avoiding crashing systems in large scale. I used a similar technique as of Python 2 and Python 3, by creating a symlink of binaries and headers. Should this be of any use, attached are the two diff patches for the openssl -current scripts. Perhaps this could sit on extras/ for the time being, until the vast majority of tools are updated and deemed working with the new OpenSSL code, or September comes, and the switch has to be made anyway.
Attached Files
File Type: txt doinst.sh-openssl.diff.txt (640 Bytes, 22 views)
File Type: txt openssl.SlackBuild.diff.txt (4.0 KB, 7 views)
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-16-2023, 04:48 AM   #1585
3rensho
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Deutschland
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,026

Rep: Reputation: 618Reputation: 618Reputation: 618Reputation: 618Reputation: 618Reputation: 618
FF-109.0 will be officially released on 17.1 but is now available

https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/109.0/

Builds fine (with PGO enabled), runs fine.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-16-2023, 05:50 AM   #1586
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,393

Rep: Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rensho View Post
FF-109.0 will be officially released on 17.1 but is now available

https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/109.0/

Builds fine (with PGO enabled), runs fine.
Code:
While being the first release of the new year, Firefox 109 isn't all that exciting unless 
you are into Firefox add-ons/extensions with Manifest Version 3 being available by default 
along with the new "Unified Extensions" button.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Mozilla-Firefox-109
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-17-2023, 01:14 AM   #1587
dchmelik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD, Illumos, NetBSD, DragonflyBSD, Plan9, Inferno, OpenBSD, FreeDOS, HURD
Posts: 1,073

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
pan 0.154 (fixed some/all crashing)
 
Old 01-17-2023, 09:23 AM   #1588
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,393

Rep: Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rensho View Post
FF-109.0 will be officially released on 17.1 but is now available

https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/109.0/

Builds fine (with PGO enabled), runs fine.
Release notes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo.../releasenotes/

Security fixes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/securi...s/mfsa2023-01/
 
Old 01-18-2023, 06:16 AM   #1589
HQuest
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Location: 2001:470:c2d0::/56
Distribution: Anything I can interface with
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
While the Apache Foundation has released httpd 2.4.55, it seems a fresh bug was found on the mod_http2.so component, leading to odd 500 type of errors and poor performance. A workaround is to run the mod_http2.so from past 2.4.54 release.
 
Old 01-18-2023, 06:36 AM   #1590
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,393

Rep: Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119Reputation: 4119
Quote:
Originally Posted by HQuest View Post
While the Apache Foundation has released httpd 2.4.55, it seems a fresh bug was found on the mod_http2.so component, leading to odd 500 type of errors and poor performance. A workaround is to run the mod_http2.so from past 2.4.54 release.
httpd 2.4.55 contains 3 (probably high?) security fixes
Code:
  *) SECURITY: CVE-2022-37436: Apache HTTP Server: mod_proxy prior to
     2.4.55 allows a backend to trigger HTTP response splitting
     (cve.mitre.org)

  *) SECURITY: CVE-2022-36760: Apache HTTP Server: mod_proxy_ajp
     Possible request smuggling (cve.mitre.org)

  *) SECURITY: CVE-2006-20001: mod_dav out of  bounds read, or write
     of zero byte (cve.mitre.org)
Any link to a bug report would be appreciated ;-)
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apache 2.4 requests to non-SSL site with "Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1" and no trailing / get redirected to default site owendelong Linux - Server 2 06-22-2021 02:08 PM
[SOLVED] Requests for -current (20151216) rworkman Slackware 3441 12-28-2017 03:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration