LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-11-2004, 10:05 PM   #1
harley51
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Downey Ca
Distribution: Fedora 11
Posts: 230

Rep: Reputation: 30
Has Anyone Noticed How Bad Fedora is Getting


Fc1 Great, Fc2 partition problems, FC3 can't get a good download and have to go backwards.

Comments:
 
Old 11-11-2004, 10:12 PM   #2
ranger_nemo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: N'rn WI -- USA
Distribution: Kubuntu 8.04, ClarkConnect 4
Posts: 1,142

Rep: Reputation: 47
Re: Has Anyone Noticed How Bad Fedora is Getting

Quote:
FC3 can't get a good download
Seems like that's a good reason to pan it... I don't get HBO, so all movies suck.
 
Old 11-11-2004, 10:29 PM   #3
harley51
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Downey Ca
Distribution: Fedora 11
Posts: 230

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
That's a great comment.
 
Old 11-11-2004, 10:58 PM   #4
homey
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,057

Rep: Reputation: 61
Quote:
FC3 can't get a good download and have to go backwards
Trouble downloading the iso images doesn't reflect the quality of operating system. IMHO, of course.

I happen to like Redhat in general and Fedora in particular and I think FC1, FC2 and FC3 are all fine.
 
Old 11-11-2004, 11:09 PM   #5
harley51
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Downey Ca
Distribution: Fedora 11
Posts: 230

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thank You I agree 100%. I have been using Red Hat and Fedora since their start. But I have noticed a downgrade in ease since FC1. If you have a suggestion on how to get good downloads please let me know. And I have an earlier post on the bad down load subject.
 
Old 11-11-2004, 11:38 PM   #6
homey
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,057

Rep: Reputation: 61
The download sites do seem to be quite busy but I don't recommend the http sites for any distro as the download may just quit for no apparent reason.
If you look at the mirror sites here http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors.html
there are a few rsync sites listed and that happens to be my favorite method. Even so, some of those mirrors are maxed out.

To use rsync from a linux terminal for any distro, I first get a listing of what is there with a command like this ...
Code:
 rsync rsync://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/fedora-linux-core/3/i386/iso/ 

Then you can proceed to download like this ....
 rsync -vP rsync://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/fedora-linux-core/3/i386/iso/FC3-i386-disc1.iso  .  
Note: that period ( . ) at the end is important and says to put the download into the directory where you are at like maybe /home/fred for example.

Don't forget to download the md5sums also ..
rsync -vP rsync://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/fedora-linux-core/3/i386/iso/MD5SUM .

and check the iso images in the directory where they exist .....
md5sum *.iso

compare it to the results of the command:
cat MD5SUM


Edit: If the download went ok and the md5sums check out ok, yet you still have problems with the cd, try burning the images at a slower speed.

Last edited by homey; 11-12-2004 at 12:23 AM.
 
Old 11-12-2004, 12:16 AM   #7
flysideways
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 151

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
have to go backwards
Huh?

It now mounts my media out of the box. Default installs on a Logical Volume. It's inches away from becoming a click and drool desktop, oh yeah, that's a bad thing.

It now has Firebird and Thunderbird, two programs that I've installed on all of our computers for a while now, Linux and Windows. MySQL 4.1 is in the development tree so now you can do temporal math. Not so sure about Totem or Helix, maybe when Theora is up and running as a codec. Totem won't play dvds of home video that I've authored(without encryption) but I'll figure that out when the gstreamer plugins catch up. It's got KWiFiManager which is a start. It'd be nice to have Bluefish.

Now when mdadm supports online growing of raid5, ipw2100 or whatever is in the kernel and maybe a decent gui for iwtools, I'll be saying Microwho?

Well, except for my video editing stuff which will probably take much longer to approach Premier's utility.
 
Old 11-12-2004, 01:06 AM   #8
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
Fedora Core 3 was only released earlier this week if I'm not mistaken. If you're having trouble downloading it, it's just because everybody and their brother is trying to do the exact same thing, and the servers that are hosting the ISO's are just getting swamped. Wait 2 or 3 weeks and the traffic should subside considerably. This (temporary) issue has nothing to do with the merits or quality of the distro itself however -- J.W.
 
Old 11-12-2004, 03:03 AM   #9
hkl8324
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 234

Rep: Reputation: 30
why dont you guys use BT (Bittorrent)...
you can get FC3 quickly with this app while you can, and should, get something back to the community. (ie.upload while downloading)
 
Old 11-12-2004, 03:08 AM   #10
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
I agree using the torrent is a very good thing. I had all four CD's 12 hours after their release (only have a 512 Kb connection) but most of the downloading happened when I was in bed.
 
Old 11-12-2004, 07:46 AM   #11
Strixy
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Nowhere, Oblivion
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 48

Rep: Reputation: 15
In my world, in so far as my own experiences with FC 1, 2 and now 3 go I can't say FC3 has managed to improve since 2 (which I loved) and , in fact, I would say that it has gotten worse.
When I downloaded and installed FC1 my update list was 18 - 20 items long during the first three days of its release. FC 2 was similar. FC 3, just yeasterday, had 124 items to be updated.
I had a little success in FC 2 and now no success in 3 for my dual monitor setup. (See bug report 136916 on bugzilla).
When I install MySQL during the installation session I hardly think I should have to go in and add 'mysqld' (along with the apache php plug, etc...) manually. It seems to me 'mysqld' is kinda important to anyone wishing to use mysql.
Installing or changing any of the packages manually has caused so many problems (see my post on Evolution not fetching) that just to use my computer for two days until the weekend comes I installed the most basic configuration I could - no perks.
My monitor, which used to run at 1280x1024, now won't. (I haven't tried to trouble shoot this yet).

What was I expecting?

I was hoping for improvements in the dual monitor area. It's still hopelessly devoid of anything resembling matrox's e-dualhead (no longer works for linux unless they finally updated which they didn't do when FC2 came out re. the new X).
I was hoping for better LDAP support, which I got. Thank you.
I was hoping for Firefox (got it) as well as mozilla (now taken out? ) which well, 50/50 there I suppose. (I can downlaod and install mozilla on my own. I use the composer quite a bit for formatting blog posts, unless anyone has any better suggestions/options I don't know about?)
Gnome. Still looks like A Mac emulating Windows on a linux box and seems to take about as long as it would to do exactly that with the software. Slow POS.
Lovin' the new KDE though! Wicked great.
Love Kerberos and the K5.
I haven't checked Apache (2.?) or php (4.? or 5.?) versions yet. anyone?

I should probably stop, woah. Thanks for putting up with my momentary rant of frustration. I guess it's new and that means it's going to take some time to get used to. I'm just a little impatient I suppose.

*edit- Mozilla is there. I typed mozilla in term and it popped up.

Last edited by Strixy; 11-12-2004 at 07:56 AM.
 
Old 11-12-2004, 07:56 AM   #12
fortezza
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Colorado
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 297

Rep: Reputation: 30
FC3 Download

Word. I decided to start the FC3 download before I went to work yesterday morning. I went to Linuxiso.org, tried an http download link and an ftp download link. No dice. Then I found a bittorrent link and it started downloading at 90kbps right away. When I can home from work, it was done. This was the DVD image, too. Probably that is not as popular as the CD installation option, and still was done within 10hours ( I don't know when it actually finished ). Booting from DVD to install rules as there is no disk-swapping to do, and it may possibly be faster than a CD install, though I do not have anything to support that.

In fact, the computer ( running FC1 )that is my guinea pig for FC3 needs a DVD drive ( which I will get today ) so I can do the install. I have several others that have FC2 on them, which I don't want to mess with at the moment. Oh, I just got an Archos AV420 last night, and I was able to just plug it in, mount it as a hard drive, and use it with FC2 out of the box, even though the vendor ( archos.com ) makes no mention of Linux in the product documentation or the support sight. I took a leap of faith that it would work and, as usual, Fedoca Core ( and Linux in general ) did not disappoint me.
 
Old 11-12-2004, 08:07 AM   #13
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604

Rep: Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103
Don't forget that LQ ISO is a great place to find fast download mirrors. If you see a good one missing, please suggest it so we can add it.

http://iso.linuxquestions.org/version.php?version=88

--jeremy
 
Old 11-12-2004, 08:09 AM   #14
baz2
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 73

Rep: Reputation: 15
Getting iso's from the mirrors in the first days of a RH/FC release has always been dicey. I got all the iso's within 2-3 days of the initial release, but not without problems. Two had failed checksums, so I had to download them all over.

Such is the price of trying to get the latest and greatest as soon as it comes out. Says nothing about the quality of the product itself.

I haven't installed yet. I'll do that today. If it needs a lot of updates almost immediately, that doesn't necessarily bother me, as long as they are available. What would be bad was if it needed lots of updates, but they weren't available.

Considering how much more is in each release, and how quickly the releases are coming (two this year), I think the Fedora community is doing a pretty good job.
 
Old 11-12-2004, 09:06 AM   #15
Strixy
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Nowhere, Oblivion
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 48

Rep: Reputation: 15
I got the CD ISO's in about 4 hours. But I'm fortunate to be 3 hops and just down the block from one of the mirrors.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i have noticed something fatenabu Mandriva 4 09-08-2005 12:59 PM
bootmisc.sh in init.d not noticed by fedora? eth0g Linux - Hardware 0 05-28-2005 12:15 AM
fedora core 1-seems really bad b_v_prashanth Fedora 1 09-24-2004 01:33 PM
Has anyone noticed this in Mandrake 9.1? guitargeek General 7 04-01-2003 11:45 AM
Has anyone else noticed... finegan Slackware 5 07-01-2002 11:02 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration