I don't believe in a god. I think of the bible along the same lines as greek myths and legends. But if anything should be banned it's that sort of response.
Was that meant to be facetious or was it a rush of blood?

2 members found this post helpful.

You changed your original post very quickly. I hope you're still an avid atheist and surely you think believing in fairy tales and imaginary beings is even more ridiculous. (-;

Point taken.

No. You have a point there. But I'm not (nor would) go around shoving my atheistic views via a sig to everyone I reply to.

Yes, a lot of nonsense is also taught in schools but unlike religions indoctrination -- very important things are taught - info that's actually based on facts, evidence, and reality.

Oh the arrogance. You are completely brainwashed.

I don't need to be saved from going to an imaginary place by your imaginary zombie pal jesus. I may have to add you to my ignore list since I cannot ignore just your sig.

Slander and gutter talk. I'd say you deserve at least 6 points for that.

You just don't get it. You presume everyone wants to here your "good news". I would bet most people on this forum are not religious and see your sig as being superfluous text.

Really?? A simple search on LQ turns up over 1000 "Welcome" posts...out of your total of 3794 replies. So, a little less than 1/3 of your TOTAL POSTS are nothing but welcomes, with lots more of the "I don't know anything about your issue, but consider changing your user name". Again, that is in violation of the LQ Rules about not posting if you have nothing to contribute to the thread.
No, you don't..but you SHOULD keep it to yourself unless you're asked. Shoving it in peoples faces is tantamount to spamming them, and you ADMIT it's a good part of the reason you welcome folks. And the larger point you *DO* keep missing (however, I think you IGNORE it), is that it may make others uncomfortable. Again, as you've been told before, people of other religions don't think YOU have the 'truth', and you sure wouldn't be too thrilled if they started putting things out there about THEIR religions, but you seem to want a free pass because YOU THINK it's the 'truth'. We don't care about your motivations....we don't care about why YOU THINK it's a good idea/the right path/etc....you're making people uncomfortable, and would squawk loudly if someone else had a similar signature in a different religion.

And something else to think about: every time you say "While I don't know....", you remove a posters question from the zero-reply list, making it LESS LIKELY that the person will get help. If others have posted, you're sending them messages leading them to believe they should log in and check, in hopes of an answer...which you didn't give.

You're at a technical forum....have you considered actually keeping your comments about the subject at hand, and trying to HELP folks?

6 members found this post helpful.

I've changed my signature. Am I in violation now?

Be careful not to get yourself repelled from the sane though that a God may exist, only because Ardvark promotes an unbiblical and bloodcurdling webpage.


http://www.divinerevelations.info/do...hell/demon.jpg

Is that a creative-illustrative, a realistic or even a low quality photographic depiction of a demon?

I wonder how many people have given their life over yet, because of your hell promotion activity?

Can we have a witness of Ardvarks fruits, then I will rethink my position?

Oscar Wilde: "Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there and finding it!"

@dunne, that type of language isn't acceptable here at LQ.

Please keep future posts in this thread on topic or the thread will be closed. Thanks.

--jeremy

Atheist here. I do not support censorship - even of things that annoy me. Please don't censor anything. Let people talk about what they will.

The LQ rules are just typical forum/bbs rules that allow civil discussion, exchange of ideas and so on, while having a way to stop trolls, annoying amounts of swearing, and flamewars. They don't seem to be geared at straight up censorship like OP is, ignorantly, rallying for.

1 members found this post helpful.