LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Games
User Name
Password
Linux - Games This forum is for all discussion relating to gaming in Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2003, 09:12 PM   #1
Bensoft Kill MS
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: KY
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
Why do Tux Racer and Chromium run so slow on my pimped out comp???


with 32 MB RIVA, amd barton 2500+, shuttle an35n ultra mobo with 512 mb 2700 ddr ram and 60 gig hdd, it should be fine, right? I got it once to be perfect on my old comp (400 k6-2, 320 ram, 16 mb voodoo 3 2000 pci, 60 gig hdd) and it ran great, I played it once, but that is all. It worked after I was changing my x config vid card driver stuff around, and randomly one time everything worked (screen savers that never had before, and those 2 games). Most of the Screen savers are good now, but not the two wigged out games.
 
Old 10-05-2003, 11:53 AM   #2
320mb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pikes peak
Distribution: Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,577

Rep: Reputation: 48
do this from term window or command line before logging to GUI
hdparm -Tt /dev/hda
/hdb or
/hdd
what ever your drive/drives designation is..........post back what the output is.......
 
Old 10-05-2003, 03:19 PM   #3
flamesrock
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Gentoo 2006.1
Posts: 405

Rep: Reputation: 30
Is mine good?

Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.31 seconds =412.90 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.22 seconds = 28.83 MB/sec
 
Old 10-05-2003, 04:14 PM   #4
ANU
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Romania
Distribution: Solaris 10
Posts: 78

Rep: Reputation: 15
lol
 
Old 10-05-2003, 05:32 PM   #5
Bensoft Kill MS
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: KY
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 65

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
387.88 MB/sec for buffer cache
28.96 MB/sec for disc read [seems slow.....for a 60 gig hdd with ata 133....enable?]

How do I get into the terminal window with no gui without changing my vid card driver so I can select whether or not to fix it? [no to get to it].
 
Old 10-05-2003, 06:18 PM   #6
rshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Perry, Iowa
Distribution: Mepis , Debian
Posts: 2,692

Rep: Reputation: 45
they are both openGL games. you say "most of the screensavers are good" are the openGL screensavers choppy as well? you might want to look at your xfreeconfig again.
 
Old 10-05-2003, 06:43 PM   #7
sandy
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Mumbai,India
Distribution: Linux Mint 12, Gentoo
Posts: 230

Rep: Reputation: 30
need further clarification ..

You say that you have installed proper drivers for your graphics card and still the games dont work..

Am I right ??
 
Old 10-05-2003, 07:23 PM   #8
LavaDevil94
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Gentoo 2004.2: Who needs exmmpkg when you have emerge?
Posts: 1,795

Rep: Reputation: 47
run glxinfo and put the output here on the forum.
 
Old 10-05-2003, 08:33 PM   #9
genghis
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: trinidad
Distribution: fedora
Posts: 55

Rep: Reputation: 15
to get to text based with no graphics

"init 3"

and run the file from there
 
Old 10-05-2003, 09:38 PM   #10
lub0
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Glasgow Scotland
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 15
Can I but in : )

Hi All,

I recently downloaded the most up2date driver from nvidia for my graphics card, and to be truthful I think its worse. I run RH8 and have GeForce2 gts ( hercules or something ) 32MB. It is a fairly decent card and in windoze it works excellent, so I am guessing I screwed up somewhere along the line when i installed the driver. I tried the command mentioned above and here is the output:

[root@localhost rpm]# glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual

visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
0x21 16 tc 0 0 0 c . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
0x22 16 dc 0 0 0 c . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None

I am still fairly new to Linux, but that is screaming out to me, HELP!

Can anyone help me on this.....

Thanks in Advance...


lub0
 
Old 10-05-2003, 09:47 PM   #11
lub0
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Glasgow Scotland
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 15
This is the results from the hdparm -Tt /dev/hda command:

root@localhost lub0]# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.66 seconds =193.91 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.41 seconds = 45.51 MB/sec
 
Old 10-07-2003, 04:14 PM   #12
LavaDevil94
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Gentoo 2004.2: Who needs exmmpkg when you have emerge?
Posts: 1,795

Rep: Reputation: 47
lub0, maybe you could install the old drivers. did those work? the new 3.x.x drivers for the ati cards dont really work, but the 2.x.x ones do (as in they have 3d-hardware accel). plus, they dont solve any of my problems, so i stick with the 2.x.x. i use a radeon 9000, though.
 
Old 10-07-2003, 05:31 PM   #13
LavaDevil94
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Gentoo 2004.2: Who needs exmmpkg when you have emerge?
Posts: 1,795

Rep: Reputation: 47
btw, i didnt know that hd i/o speed would have much to do with it, because it usually is pretty good.
 
Old 10-08-2003, 11:11 AM   #14
Micro420
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986

Rep: Reputation: 45
It's definitely a video card driver issue. I have a Radeon 9700 Pro and when I first ran those games, it was like running in Software Mode.
I installed my ATI drivers and I can play those games with smoothness. I can even play Enemy Territory with no frame rate drops at all.
Plus I don't think your video card is that pimped out in the first place.
 
Old 10-08-2003, 07:50 PM   #15
lub0
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Glasgow Scotland
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 15
Licked

Hi All,

I reinstalled the nvidia driver and updated my XFree86 config file ( replaced driver "nv" with nividia and hey presto, games were running smoothly.. When I edited the config file the first time it blew out and said it could not find the nvidia libraries. Second time I install there they are, works first time.

I figure somehow on the first install something went a miss because it appeared to install completely each time?....

Thank you everyone for your help on it ( much appreciated )
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tux racer very slow vegetassj2 Linux - Games 14 03-05-2005 06:54 PM
Tux Racer Runs Slow holymoo Linux - Hardware 4 07-03-2004 01:16 AM
what happened to tux racer and chromium caleb star Fedora 3 06-21-2004 03:13 PM
tux racer and chromium run very slowly PennyroyalFrog Fedora 1 06-20-2004 12:24 AM
tux racer - X server -too slow biophysics1 Linux - Software 0 03-12-2003 10:43 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Games

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration