The Big, Silly, Just for Fun, Slackware 13. Release Day Sweep-stakes....
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Going with a x.0 KDE version could be a bit "adventurous" for a release
David in KL
Except it's not a dot-oh, it's a dot-three, and in this case Slackware itself is a dot-oh so it could be argued that it's the best time to do anything risky. Risk averse users could hang back on 12.2 until 13.1 after all.
I generally agree with avoiding the bleeding edge, but I'm not so sure in this case. KDE 4 is still in such an early state of development that I think the fixes that 4.3 bring would probably outweigh the usual risks of early adoption.
However, you've got to draw a line somewhere, or you end up constantly waiting a little extra for <insert latest must have version here> and never release anything.
Perhaps the best approach here to to get 13.0 out, and then have a very short development cycle for 13.1 should kde 4.3 prove to be a significant improvement over 4.2.
Anyway, that's just my opinion and I'm sure Pat has his own, and his is the one that counts. Besides, as I use WindowMaker, I really shouldn't comment as it doesn't matter to me.
Except it's not a dot-oh, it's a dot-three, and in this case Slackware itself is a dot-oh so it could be argued that it's the best time to do anything risky. Risk averse users could hang back on 12.2 until 13.1 after all.
I generally agree with avoiding the bleeding edge, but I'm not so sure in this case. KDE 4 is still in such an early state of development that I think the fixes that 4.3 bring would probably outweigh the usual risks of early adoption.
However, you've got to draw a line somewhere, or you end up constantly waiting a little extra for <insert latest must have version here> and never release anything.
Perhaps the best approach here to to get 13.0 out, and then have a very short development cycle for 13.1 should kde 4.3 prove to be a significant improvement over 4.2.
Anyway, that's just my opinion and I'm sure Pat has his own, and his is the one that counts. Besides, as I use WindowMaker, I really shouldn't comment as it doesn't matter to me.
But 4.3 brings policykit and all that other fun, desktop related innovations, which wouldnt fit since the Slackware -current tree had been tagged as RC1 more than a month ago.
But 4.3 brings policykit and all that other fun, desktop related innovations, which wouldnt fit since the Slackware -current tree had been tagged as RC1 more than a month ago.
Indeed, which is why I made the comment about having to draw the line somewhere. All I was getting at is that as KDE4 isn't so rock solid in it's current state, the bleeding edge v stable argument isn't quite so clear cut.
Generally, myself, I am always happy to see that each Slackware Version comes as so incredibly stable and "bugfree" that I dare to switch to a dot-oh blindfolded. I hope (and expect) that this will remain so. Yes, less bleeding edge, less innovation maybe... but stability outweighs arguments like that.
That said, I hope a 4.3 will become available in a soon-to-release 13.1 or, as done currently bring it as a patch / or -current. I think that would satisfy most people. Compiling KDE is not a trivial thing, not leasts due the time taken to compile it all. Been there, done that... lost a few days just by compiling.
But 4.3 brings policykit and all that other fun, desktop related innovations, which wouldnt fit since the Slackware -current tree had been tagged as RC1 more than a month ago.
I guess right now KDE is a problem without a good solution. Staying with 3.x is bad, including 4.3 is bad, and staying with 4.2 is also bad. However, even if KDE 4 was more mature, the choice between staying with 4.2 or including 4.3 would be tough anyway.
I guess the ideal solution may be to extend /extra and put the latest versions of all that which has no dependencies on each other there. In stable, /extra will have lots of new stuff like the latest KDE (it is not a Slackware but upstream problem if it is buggy; bugs in KDE 4.3 are fun for KDE 4.3 fans), XFCE, mplayer, and so on. In current only ruby 1.9, python 3, and the like should be added. This will allow to replace the major part of compiling slackbuilds and manual downloading of packages with the comfort of slackpkg, provided the latter is modified to understand when it should prefer /extra.
I understand that this introduces rudimentary dependency tracking, but if done the agile and informal way, like K3B does not depend on KDE, it should not hurt.
Or smaller. There is nobody ANYTHING more than Bob. As Dan from Linux Outlaws said, can't mess with his Bobness (it was a Bob Marley reference, but obviously he was channelling The Real Bob).
I admit, I've never put much thought into, nor taken much interest in, all this "Bob Dobbs" and "SubGenius" stuff.
I just now checked out the website for the first time, and gotta say, it appears to be pretty bizarre.. I've only looked at two pages in total, and have determined that the site *might* not be for the faint of heart, or faint of stomach
My guess is 07.08.09. Kde 4.3 should be ready in two days and I think Friday would be a good choice.
Dolphin
good {day|night|morning} to everybody.
it seems that I was wrong. And I have to admit that I am really happy about this. Because Mr. Volkerding knows his work better then anybody and doesn't listen too much people who wants only the top new soft. And as a consequence, we (and I personally) will (shall) win (I mean like a users of brilliant distribution).
The great job is already done by the Slackware team. Very soon I believe we will get new stable version. And, as written in Changelog.txt, new -current will be started. (At this moment most of us will think something like: -current is dead. Welcome to the new -current).
PS. sorry if you think I am flooding. I am already a month in hospital. Thus I have a little bit of 'nostalgia' in my mind.
Well, I was *way* off in my first post in this thread, saying "first of July".
But I am glad that Pat has waited until now, including the newer versions of X and FireFox 3.5 and other useful things.
I guess we are really close now and won't see major changes before the release.
The aaa_base package still needs an update though, to change the "Welcome to Linux (Slackware 12.2)" message
The aaa_base package still needs an update though, to change the "Welcome to Linux (Slackware 12.2)" message
Also, we still have "ANNOUNCE.12_2" in the top level directory. I'm getting impatient.. I'm in need of my new Slackware fix . However, I know that once it's done, it'll be good. I've not been disappointed with a Slackware release yet.
I'm getting impatient.. I'm in need of my new Slackware fix . However, I know that once it's done, it'll be good. I've not been disappointed with a Slackware release yet.
I hear you, man! RC2 is very sweet indeed. Slackware 13.0 is going to be another amazing Slackware release; I can hardly wait.
I admit, I've never put much thought into, nor taken much interest in, all this "Bob Dobbs" and "SubGenius" stuff.
I just now checked out the website for the first time, and gotta say, it appears to be pretty bizarre.. I've only looked at two pages in total, and have determined that the site *might* not be for the faint of heart, or faint of stomach
I first came across The Church Of The SubGenius in the works of Robert Anton Wilson in the late '70s. I read some of his other stuff after reading and enjoying the Illuminatus! trilogy.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.