LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2022, 01:31 AM   #61
Pithium
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2014
Location: Far side of the Oregon Trail
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 508

Rep: Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586

Quote:
Originally Posted by PartiZan View Post
I can do that locally, not a big deal.

Trying to suggest things to improve is something toxic now... Well, what I can say is go to my black list for your stupidity.
That's too bad. I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt here, but apparently you are determined to start fights and keep doubling down on your mistake. Oh well...
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-03-2022, 01:32 AM   #62
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,979

Rep: Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pithium View Post
And FWIW, I've been poking at the way slackpkg info <pkg> displays info on my screen and there is definitely room for improvement. It's not broken, but when viewing info for a package that exists in multiple repos (I'm using slackpkg+) things get pretty messy. There's definitely room for discussion on improving that output because right now it hurts my brain..
Code:
root@vapyr:~# slackpkg info mesa-compat32


NOTICE: pkglist is older than 24h; you are encouraged to re-run 'slackpkg update'

PACKAGE NAME:  mesa-compat32-21.3.5-x86_64-2compat32.txz
PACKAGE LOCATION:  ./x-compat32
PACKAGE SIZE (compressed):  20005 K
PACKAGE SIZE (uncompressed):  200780 K
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION:
mesa-compat32: mesa-compat32 (a 3-D graphics library)
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Mesa is a 3-D graphics library with an API very similar to that of
mesa-compat32: another well-known 3-D graphics library. The Mesa libraries are used
mesa-compat32: by X to provide both software and hardware accelerated graphics.
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Mesa was written by Brian Paul.
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Homepage: https://www.mesa3d.org
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: This package contains 32-bit compatibility binaries.

PACKAGE NAME:  mesa-compat32-21.3.5-x86_64-2compat32.txz
PACKAGE LOCATION:  ./slackware64-compat32/x-compat32
PACKAGE SIZE (compressed):  41988 K
PACKAGE SIZE (uncompressed):  200780 K
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION:
mesa-compat32: mesa-compat32 (a 3-D graphics library)
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Mesa is a 3-D graphics library with an API very similar to that of
mesa-compat32: another well-known 3-D graphics library. The Mesa libraries are used
mesa-compat32: by X to provide both software and hardware accelerated graphics.
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Mesa was written by Brian Paul.
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Homepage: https://www.mesa3d.org
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: This package contains 32-bit compatibility binaries.


Package:    mesa-compat32-21.3.5-x86_64-2compat32
Repository: compat32
Path:       ./x-compat32/mesa-compat32-21.3.5-x86_64-2compat32.txz
Url:        http://192.168.0.13/mirror/slackware/multilib/15.0/x-compat32/mesa-compat32-21.3.5-x86_64-2compat32.txz

Package:    mesa-compat32-21.3.5-x86_64-2compat32
Repository: multilib
Path:       ./slackware64-compat32/x-compat32/mesa-compat32-21.3.5-x86_64-2compat32.txz
Url:        https://taper.alienbase.nl/people/alien/multilib/15.0/slackware64-compat32/x-compat32/mesa-compat32-21.3.5-x86_64-2compat32.txz
My brain has better things to do than parse large blocks of machine readable text. I have a computer to handle those mundane tasks.
There is something wrong with your setup or how you installed. I use slackpkg with slackpkg+, this is what I get.
Code:
~# slackpkg info mesa-compat32

PACKAGE NAME:  mesa-compat32-21.3.8-x86_64-1compat32.txz
PACKAGE LOCATION:  ./slackware64-compat32/x-compat32
PACKAGE SIZE (compressed):  42008 K
PACKAGE SIZE (uncompressed):  200850 K
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION:
mesa-compat32: mesa-compat32 (a 3-D graphics library)
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Mesa is a 3-D graphics library with an API very similar to that of
mesa-compat32: another well-known 3-D graphics library. The Mesa libraries are used
mesa-compat32: by X to provide both software and hardware accelerated graphics.
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Mesa was written by Brian Paul.
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: Homepage: https://www.mesa3d.org
mesa-compat32:
mesa-compat32: This package contains 32-bit compatibility binaries.


Package:    mesa-compat32-21.3.8-x86_64-1compat32
Repository: multilib
Path:       ./slackware64-compat32/x-compat32/mesa-compat32-21.3.8-x86_64-1compat32.txz
Url:        file://home/non-slack/multilib/current/slackware64-compat32/x-compat32/mesa-compat32-21.3.8-x86_64-1compat32.txz

Last edited by chrisretusn; 04-03-2022 at 02:00 AM.
 
Old 04-03-2022, 01:43 AM   #63
Pithium
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2014
Location: Far side of the Oregon Trail
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 508

Rep: Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586
@chrisretusn I have alienbob's repo added as "multilib" , and then a local "compat32" repo with higher priority. I run massconvert32 to make my own packages and store them on my own NAS. I set this up back when alienbob's server was struggling and I was getting insane download times.

slackpkg seems to put every package in the same PACKAGES.TXT file and slackpkg info just prints every instance of that package. So in my case, compat32 packages end up have 2 instances with one of them being masked.

I can see how this might be jarring since it deviates from how 'slackpkg search' displays similar info. Not at all a bug, and certainly not the result of negligence** by whoever wrote that particular feature. It's just ugly



** OP needs to check the dictionary definition of negligent. It's such a rude word to use in any open source context and he really doesn't seem to get it.
 
Old 04-03-2022, 01:59 AM   #64
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,979

Rep: Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pithium View Post
@chrisretusn I have alienbob's repo added as "multilib" , and then a local "compat32" repo with higher priority. I run massconvert32 to make my own packages and store them on my own NAS. I set this up back when alienbob's server was struggling and I was getting insane download times.
ah okay, I sort of suspected something like this. Your output is simply reporting what you have. Makes perfect sense.

My use case. I use a sync (manual run using a batch file "update.multilib.sh") of alienbob's multilib locally.

Last edited by chrisretusn; 04-03-2022 at 02:00 AM.
 
Old 04-03-2022, 12:44 PM   #65
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pithium View Post
Relax with the declarations of intent. You aren't a slackpkg dev and your name isn't credited at the top of the script
If you read through the code, there is no way to think they didn't purposefully strip anything off everything but the package name.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PartiZan View Post
This was not intentional for sure; It was written and forgotten. It's not by design, but by negligence.
How can you read the code and not say it was intentional? They even pass it through the cutpkg awk script, which only has one function, to remove everything from the variable except for the package name. The developer(s) specifically chose to remove everything but the package name when searching PACKAGES.TXT.

Now, if you have a better solution, they might be willing to change how slackpkg info functions, but the way it currently functions was written purposefully to remove everything but the package name and use that for parsing the PACKAGES.TXT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PartiZan View Post
Trying to suggest things to improve is something toxic now... Well, what I can say is go to my black list for your stupidity.
You're not suggesting something to improve, you're saying something is broken.

Those are two wildly different things. One is considered an enhancement and the other is considered a bug. You've definitely been considering this a bug when it is obvious it isn't. If you had decided to push for an improvement, that might've been received differently.

Last edited by bassmadrigal; 04-03-2022 at 12:46 PM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-11-2022, 09:43 PM   #66
xunilq
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2016
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by xunilq View Post
Report of wireshark behavior over Kernel 5.17.0

Wireshark doesn't show packets over Monitor Mode on wlan0

/var/log/syslog no messages related

/var/log/messages:

Code:
kernel: device wlan0 left promiscuous mode
Kernel 5.15.27, works fine on monitor mode, difference on log:

Code:
kernel: device wlan0 entered promiscuous mode
kernel: device wlan0 left promiscuous mode
My Wlan device:

Code:
AR9565 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01)
-----------------------------

PS for possible googlers, the monitor checkbox on wireshark doesn't work. i have set monitor mode like this:

Code:
ip link set wlan0 down
iw dev wlan0 set type monitor
ip link set wlan0 up
Fixed with 5.17.2
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-14-2022, 10:20 AM   #67
steve4lqdo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2022
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 1
Regarding suspend/resume issues on AMD based Lenovo ThinkPad T495, the issue seems to be resolved with the combination of kernel-generic-5.17.3-x86_64-1 and kernel-firmware-20220411_f219d61.

Last edited by steve4lqdo; 04-14-2022 at 05:35 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-14-2022, 11:33 AM   #68
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,409

Rep: Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142Reputation: 4142
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve4lqdo View Post
Regarding suspend/resume issues on AMD based Lenovo ThinkPad T495, the issue seems to be revolved with the combination of kernel-generic-5.17.3-x86_64-1 and kernel-firmware-20220411_f219d61.
I would also like to share my experience on this subject
My hibernation/resume problem was solved by switching from eLilo to grub
I think this is something to consider
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-14-2022, 11:43 AM   #69
steve4lqdo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2022
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 1
Have been using Grub all along as I dual boot Slackware64-current and Linux Mint 19.3. Recent kernel upgrade solved the AMD based suspend/resume for me (in Slackware - Mint was used briefly recently to be able to suspend/resume, but now back to Slackware, again ;-).
 
Old 04-14-2022, 11:46 AM   #70
steve4lqdo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2022
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve4lqdo View Post
Have been using Grub all along as I dual boot Slackware64-current and Linux Mint 19.3. Recent kernel upgrade solved the AMD based suspend/resume for me (in Slackware - Mint was used briefly recently to be able to suspend/resume, but now back to Slackware, again ;-).
Apologies - should have used the Quote option on my prior post - Newbie!
 
Old 04-14-2022, 04:40 PM   #71
ttk
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 1,038
Blog Entries: 27

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
EDITED: D'OH! Disregard, I see there's already an update that fixes this :-}

Git security vulnerability announced:

https://github.blog/2022-04-12-git-s...ity-announced/

Mentions two CVE. CVE-2022-24765 appears relevant to Slackware when used in a multi-user environment, but the other CVE is Windows-specific.

Last edited by ttk; 04-14-2022 at 05:34 PM. Reason: disregard!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KDE x64 current bug reports fulalas Slackware 36 10-12-2021 01:16 AM
How stable is -Current compared to Stable? bulletfreak Slackware 7 08-01-2016 06:25 PM
Stable 13 kernel vs Current kernel in Stable system linus72 Slackware 6 04-01-2010 07:45 AM
[BUG] Current pkgtools installpkg bug jazzor Slackware 7 04-16-2009 05:30 AM
How to submit bug reports to Mandrakesoft? registering Mandriva 2 06-04-2004 09:32 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration