LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-20-2022, 10:37 AM   #1351
Thom1b
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 486

Rep: Reputation: 339Reputation: 339Reputation: 339Reputation: 339

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddog83 View Post
This patch fix's a bug in glib-2.74.1 where gnome keyring use's 100% of the cpu at all times.

This patch was pushed into the 2.75.0 branch but backported into the 2.74 branch.
Thanks, it works like a charm!
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-21-2022, 02:02 AM   #1352
camerabambai
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 408

Rep: Reputation: 54
I have a request:

libvirt on Slackware
virt-top on Slackware

Libvirt is easy, already exist in SBO repos

Virt-top is a nice Redhat program similar to top, but show vm instead of process, there is only one problem: it have a lot of deps (cppo, ocaml-extlib, ocaml-libvirt and probably many others, the 80% of this deps are not on Slackware repos)
 
Old 11-21-2022, 11:50 AM   #1353
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,421

Rep: Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160
wayland-protocols 1.30

Code:
Staging: Add tearing control protocol

For some use cases like games or drawing tablets it can make sense to reduce
latency by accepting tearing with the use of asynchronous page flips. This
protocol provides a way for clients to indicate whether or not their content
is suitable for this kind of presentation.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayla...land-protocols

More info on phoronix
 
Old 11-22-2022, 08:49 AM   #1354
lecramyajiv
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2015
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
sbopkg

A package manager to maintain slackbuilds scripts.Since slackbuilds.org are endorsed by patrick It would be beneficial for users to have access to more software.

https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ly-4175575223/

Last edited by lecramyajiv; 11-22-2022 at 09:02 AM. Reason: updated
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-23-2022, 03:26 PM   #1355
John Lumby
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Lumby View Post
Not sure is this is the best forum to request it, but for us sendmail diehards, whoever maintains sendmail in extra, please build a sendmail-8.17.1-noarch-4.txz with this fix

https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/a....cgi?id=233353

as anyone running the current 8.17.1-noarch-3 and using AUTH for client submission will be hitting this

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/sh....cgi?id=262935

And while I am thinking of it (and I probably should know this)
where can I find the source patches which our slackware sendmail guy has applied to the sendmail-8.17.1 distribution to build noarch-3?

Cheers, John Lumby
I'm disappointed to find that, 5 months after I posted the above in this forum, there is still no new sendmail-8.17.1-noarch-4.txz with the aforementioned fix.

Is asking in this forum the correct process for requesting that the maintainer applies known fixes to a package (in extra)?
Indeed, is there any process at all?


Update - sorry, what I wrote was wrong - the package has in fact now been updated to suffix-6. (I was looking in the wrong place ...). Thanks, package maintainer.

Last edited by John Lumby; 11-23-2022 at 08:06 PM.
 
Old 11-23-2022, 03:54 PM   #1356
LuckyCyborg
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,559

Rep: Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Lumby View Post
I'm disappointed to find that, 5 months after I posted the above in this forum, there is still no new sendmail-8.17.1-noarch-4.txz with the aforementioned fix.

Is asking in this forum the correct process for requesting that the maintainer applies known fixes to a package (in extra)?
Indeed, is there any process at all?
Maybe the sendmail is assigned to a future removal from slackware-current, hence from the future Slackware 15.1 , so no further updates makes sense. Who knows? After all, the Slackware development is a Cathedral, not a Bazaar.

Anyway, there's one single developer who decide what enters in the Slackware tree: Mr. Volkerding.

And I for one, I can bet that he already read your first post. He read this thread often.

Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 11-23-2022 at 04:04 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-23-2022, 06:47 PM   #1357
HQuest
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Location: 2001:470:c2d0::/56
Distribution: Anything I can interface with
Posts: 93

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
What are the odds of adding Nginx into extras? While Apache is truly reliable and one of (if not still #1) most run web servers out there, it is lagging behind many others in modern features. Nginx has been proven reliable enough to power certain commercial appliances (under its commercial code), and it wouldn’t be a bad move to have it as an alternative.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-23-2022, 07:02 PM   #1358
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,421

Rep: Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by HQuest View Post
What are the odds of adding Nginx into extras?
Maintain 2 web servers, when one is enough ?
And the other is community maintained on SBo
 
Old 11-23-2022, 07:22 PM   #1359
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,421

Rep: Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160Reputation: 4160
GTK+ 3.24.35
Code:
* GtkFontChooserWidget:
 - Fix a critical
* GtkAccelLabel:
 - Differentiate keypad keysyms in accelerators
* Input:
 - Recognize stylus devices as pens
 - Fix problems with motion compression
* Windows:
 - Build system improvements
* Wayland:
 - Fix problems with unreliable DND
 - Use GLES if required
 - Add support for titlebar gestures
 - Refactor handling of IM client updates
 - Fix cursor hotspots with scaled surfaces
 - Use the xdg-activation protocol
 - Load cursors on demand
 - Fix cursor size on hi-dpi displays
* MacOS:
 - Use a CVDisplayLink based frame clock
Changelog:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-...1c7f14d67de119
 
Old 11-23-2022, 08:09 PM   #1360
John Lumby
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyCyborg View Post
After all, the Slackware development is a Cathedral, not a Bazaar.

Anyway, there's one single developer who decide what enters in the Slackware tree: Mr. Volkerding.

And I for one, I can bet that he already read your first post. He read this thread often.
Thanks - Good to know. And, in any case, I was wrong to say it was still at suffix-3 patch level - It has been updated several times and is now at patch level 6. I've corrected my earlier posting.
 
Old 11-23-2022, 08:39 PM   #1361
HQuest
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Location: 2001:470:c2d0::/56
Distribution: Anything I can interface with
Posts: 93

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by marav View Post
Maintain 2 web servers, when one is enough ?
And the other is community maintained on SBo
I don’t see too much of a hassle. We are not talking KDE efforts. Apache has been updated once in a blue moon (for many reasons), and Nginx isn’t a time waster with their release cycle. sendmail is still offered as an option to postfix in extras. PHP has both v7 in mainline and v8 in extras/. We had two gcc and glibc before (again, for reasons).

If Apache fits most needs and people are fine living in the 90’s, that’s fine and perfectly acceptable. Others might want to look at 2023 and go after newer solutions, and I expected not to offend by asking, the same way I expect “no” as an answer and I shall continue to compile one from SBo/sources myself until minds are changed.

Perhaps I should have contributed by posting a compressed file with all necessary artifacts for Nginx - would be better than my ask out of the blue, but then again, these are almost the same files as found on SBo, so not too obscure to find them.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-23-2022, 08:51 PM   #1362
HQuest
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Location: 2001:470:c2d0::/56
Distribution: Anything I can interface with
Posts: 93

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Lumby View Post
where can I find the source patches which our slackware sendmail guy has applied to the sendmail-8.17.1 distribution to build noarch-3?
https://mirrors.slackware.com/slackw...urce/sendmail/

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Lumby View Post
Is asking in this forum the correct process for requesting that the maintainer applies known fixes to a package (in extra)?
At this point, it would make much more sense to use sendmail latest snapshot version instead of patch X maintained by Y. I understand Claus A and/or Proofpoint doesn’t have a formal release cycle (at least for the public community supported sendmail), but the snapshots are still being supported. Maybe because everyone is turning to the “friendlier” postfix?
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-24-2022, 07:59 AM   #1363
John Lumby
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by HQuest View Post
everyone is turning to the “friendlier” postfix?
Are they? Can we find out? It might be useful to know e.g. how many slackers run a sendmail process and how many run a postfix process. That would then inform those kinds of decision. Is there any way a poll could be held?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-24-2022, 10:11 AM   #1364
LuckyCyborg
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,559

Rep: Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426Reputation: 3426
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Lumby View Post
Are they? Can we find out? It might be useful to know e.g. how many slackers run a sendmail process and how many run a postfix process. That would then inform those kinds of decision. Is there any way a poll could be held?
Honestly, I refuse to believe that those 100 users who usually hangs around in this forum represents The Slackware Community. Would be too sad if this will be true. Will mean that Slackware is dead if all of its users counts as ONE HUNDRED.

I for one, from some educated guesses seen in another places, I believe that the Slackers count is around 10000 in the entire World. Only in my country are forums where are several times more Slackers than in this official forum of Slackware.

So, permit me to I ask you: what you believe that those 100 Slackers here are? Something like The Slackware Senate, elected to chose which email server shall ships Slackware?

I for one I believe that those 100 (including me) hanging here around, are NOT entitled to make any decision on the name of The Slackware Community because they does not represent it. So, the polls like this are absolutely meaningless.

Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 11-24-2022 at 10:23 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-24-2022, 10:32 AM   #1365
John Lumby
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyCyborg View Post
I ask you: what you believe that those 100 Slackers here are? Something like The Slackware Senate, elected to chose which email server shall ships Slackware?
Well, I take your point, and I did not say the poll should be limited to this forum, ideally it would include all slackers, but there are practical considerations too.

But it seems that, today, a poll of one person provides that usage information based on maybe assumption and rumour about use of sendmail vs. postfix. A poll of 100 would be more representative and more informative, no?

And also, I was not suggesting that the poll should be binding on the person making that decision, (hah - the very idea!!) -- only that it would provide at least some hard facts to inform that decision, rather than assumptions which might be completely wrong.

How would you find out what the current sendmail/postfix usage is among slackers?

Cheers, John
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apache 2.4 requests to non-SSL site with "Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1" and no trailing / get redirected to default site owendelong Linux - Server 2 06-22-2021 02:08 PM
[SOLVED] Requests for -current (20151216) rworkman Slackware 3441 12-28-2017 03:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration