LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-12-2023, 09:23 AM   #436
gauchao
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Veneto
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 366

Rep: Reputation: 143Reputation: 143

Thank you, again.

Next Libreoffice upgrade I will remember to also upgrade libxml2 and remove the old file from libreoffice directory.
 
Old 12-12-2023, 10:03 AM   #437
kgha
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2018
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware 64 -current multilib from AlienBob's LiveSlak MATE
Posts: 1,074

Rep: Reputation: 746Reputation: 746Reputation: 746Reputation: 746Reputation: 746Reputation: 746Reputation: 746
Still a bit mysterious why the libxml2.so file is missing from AlienBob' s package. His buildscript is written to pick up libxml2-2.11.4.tar.xz from https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/src/ and that's the latest version available there.

Last edited by kgha; 12-12-2023 at 10:15 AM.
 
Old 12-12-2023, 10:11 AM   #438
Bindestreck
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 820

Rep: Reputation: 440Reputation: 440Reputation: 440Reputation: 440Reputation: 440
For me I get this compilation error:

Code:
lt-lang-db.c:241:18: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘malloc’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  241 |         retval = malloc(sizeof (lt_lang_db_iter_t));
      |                  ^~~~~~
lt-lang-db.c:241:18: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘malloc’
lt-lang-db.c:241:18: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘malloc’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
lt-lang-db.c:241:18: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘malloc’
lt-lang-db.c:246:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  246 |                 free(retval);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-lang-db.c:246:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-lang-db.c: In function ‘lt_lang_db_lookup’:
lt-lang-db.c:351:9: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  351 |         free(s);
      |         ^~~~
lt-lang-db.c:351:9: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-mem.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-messages.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-redundant.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-redundant-db.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-region.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-region-db.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-relation-db.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-script.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-script-db.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-string.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-tag.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-trie.lo
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_string_compare’:
lt-tag.c:90:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘free’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
   90 |         free(s1);
      |         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:36:1: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
   35 | #include "lt-tag-private.h"
  +++ |+#include <stdlib.h>
   36 | 
lt-tag.c:90:9: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
   90 |         free(s1);
      |         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:90:9: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘lt_tag_scanner_new’:
lt-tag.c:103:65: error: ‘free’ undeclared (first use in this function)
  103 |                 lt_mem_add_ref(&retval->parent, retval->string, free);
      |                                                                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:103:65: note: ‘free’ is defined in header ‘<stdlib.h>’; did you forget to ‘#include <stdlib.h>’?
lt-tag.c:103:65: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
lt-tag.c: In function ‘lt_tag_parse_state’:
lt-tag.c:600:45: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  600 |                                             free(langtag);
      |                                             ^~~~
lt-tag.c:600:45: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_parse’:
lt-tag.c:725:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  725 |                         free(token);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:725:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:789:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  789 |                 free(token);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:789:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_convert_from_locale_string’:
lt-tag.c:1213:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1213 |                 free(transform);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1213:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:1230:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1230 |                 free(s);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1230:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_canonicalize_alias’:
lt-tag.c:1296:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1296 |                 free(q);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1296:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_canonicalize’:
lt-tag.c:1507:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1507 |                         free(s);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1507:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:1536:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1536 |                         free(retval);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1536:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘lt_tag_convert_to_locale’:
lt-tag.c:2032:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 2032 |                 free(canonical_tag);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:2032:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:2042:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 2042 |                         free(retval);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:2042:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘lt_tag_transform’:
lt-tag.c:2321:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 2321 |                 free(s);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:2321:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:2426:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 2426 |                         free(xpath_string);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:2426:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
make[6]: *** [Makefile:973: liblangtag_la-lt-tag.lo] Error 1
Not sure if this is related to anything what you guys are talking about...
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-12-2023, 10:24 AM   #439
Petri Kaukasoina
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,823

Rep: Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgha View Post
Still a bit mysterious why the libxml2.so file is missing from AlienBob' s package. His buildscript is written to pick up libxml2-2.11.4.tar.xz from https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/src/ and that's the latest version available there.
But he uses --with-system-libxml, so he links against libxml2.so.2.9.14 which was on his computer last Thursday when he built libreoffice. But three days later, Patrick upgraded the system library to libxml2.so.2.12.2. It should be compatible because the SONAME was the same (libxml2.so.2) but seems it's not.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-12-2023, 10:58 AM   #440
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,130

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298
Either way it has always works just fine here regardless of -current updates or kernel version.
 
Old 12-12-2023, 11:10 AM   #441
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,393

Rep: Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118
Libreoffice Draw
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20231212_180915.png
Views:	50
Size:	18.6 KB
ID:	42221  
 
Old 12-12-2023, 11:25 AM   #442
Petri Kaukasoina
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,823

Rep: Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496Reputation: 1496
Quote:
Originally Posted by marav View Post
Libreoffice Draw
marav, try https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post6469959
 
Old 12-12-2023, 11:37 AM   #443
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,393

Rep: Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118Reputation: 4118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petri Kaukasoina View Post
I'm fine with that because I don't really use libreoffice Draw here
I'm just pointing out that I'm having the same issue
 
Old 12-12-2023, 02:12 PM   #444
dhalliwe
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2022
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 165

Rep: Reputation: 155Reputation: 155
I am using an older version of Libre Office (7.3.1.3, using a package from SlackOnly).

Draw failed to run for me today, popping up an error message about failing to load /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/libsdlo.so. That particular library shows libxml2.so as a dependency, which I had upgraded on December 10 when the new version came available.

I tried the trick Petri suggested in https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post6469959. No joy for me.

Downgrading to the earlier limbxml2-2.9.14 made the error go away.

So, not just alien's package, or the most recent Libre Office.

General problems with this package update noted on the SlackBuilds mailing list - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/piperm...er/028772.html.
 
Old 12-12-2023, 11:13 PM   #445
chris.willing
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2014
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Slackware,LFS
Posts: 917

Rep: Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619
For LibreOffice builders using SBo: until the LO devs deal with problems associated with the recently updated libxml, the LibreOffice SlackBuild has just been updated to use the internally provided libxml (thereby avoiding the libxml update problem). Update is at https://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbui...898f21c6a438e5 (or wait until SBo global update at the weekend).

If building on -current, also remove the line:
Code:
--with-system-icu \
(as per SlackBuild in ponce's repo).

chris
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-13-2023, 01:41 AM   #446
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,670

Rep: Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786
Chris, xmlsec is fixed on my branch
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-13-2023, 05:53 AM   #447
chris.willing
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2014
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Slackware,LFS
Posts: 917

Rep: Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619
Thanks Willy, xmlsec reinstated.
 
Old 12-13-2023, 08:09 AM   #448
shelldweller
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2019
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 300

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bindestreck View Post
For me I get this compilation error:

Code:
lt-lang-db.c:241:18: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘malloc’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  241 |         retval = malloc(sizeof (lt_lang_db_iter_t));
      |                  ^~~~~~
lt-lang-db.c:241:18: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘malloc’
lt-lang-db.c:241:18: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘malloc’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
lt-lang-db.c:241:18: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘malloc’
lt-lang-db.c:246:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  246 |                 free(retval);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-lang-db.c:246:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-lang-db.c: In function ‘lt_lang_db_lookup’:
lt-lang-db.c:351:9: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  351 |         free(s);
      |         ^~~~
lt-lang-db.c:351:9: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-mem.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-messages.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-redundant.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-redundant-db.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-region.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-region-db.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-relation-db.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-script.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-script-db.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-string.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-tag.lo
  CC       liblangtag_la-lt-trie.lo
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_string_compare’:
lt-tag.c:90:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘free’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
   90 |         free(s1);
      |         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:36:1: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
   35 | #include "lt-tag-private.h"
  +++ |+#include <stdlib.h>
   36 | 
lt-tag.c:90:9: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
   90 |         free(s1);
      |         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:90:9: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘lt_tag_scanner_new’:
lt-tag.c:103:65: error: ‘free’ undeclared (first use in this function)
  103 |                 lt_mem_add_ref(&retval->parent, retval->string, free);
      |                                                                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:103:65: note: ‘free’ is defined in header ‘<stdlib.h>’; did you forget to ‘#include <stdlib.h>’?
lt-tag.c:103:65: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
lt-tag.c: In function ‘lt_tag_parse_state’:
lt-tag.c:600:45: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  600 |                                             free(langtag);
      |                                             ^~~~
lt-tag.c:600:45: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_parse’:
lt-tag.c:725:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  725 |                         free(token);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:725:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:789:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
  789 |                 free(token);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:789:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_convert_from_locale_string’:
lt-tag.c:1213:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1213 |                 free(transform);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1213:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:1230:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1230 |                 free(s);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1230:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_canonicalize_alias’:
lt-tag.c:1296:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1296 |                 free(q);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1296:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘_lt_tag_canonicalize’:
lt-tag.c:1507:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1507 |                         free(s);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1507:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:1536:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 1536 |                         free(retval);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:1536:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘lt_tag_convert_to_locale’:
lt-tag.c:2032:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 2032 |                 free(canonical_tag);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:2032:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:2042:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 2042 |                         free(retval);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:2042:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c: In function ‘lt_tag_transform’:
lt-tag.c:2321:17: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 2321 |                 free(s);
      |                 ^~~~
lt-tag.c:2321:17: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
lt-tag.c:2426:25: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘free’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
 2426 |                         free(xpath_string);
      |                         ^~~~
lt-tag.c:2426:25: note: include ‘<stdlib.h>’ or provide a declaration of ‘free’
make[6]: *** [Makefile:973: liblangtag_la-lt-tag.lo] Error 1
Not sure if this is related to anything what you guys are talking about...
I got this as well, but only on 32-bit, not 64-bit. I even tested on a clean fully-patched install, and I still hit the same error. Then, I tried compiling liblangtag separately and that spit out the same error in the same place. For whatever reason, liblangtag is not compiling on 32-bit. 64-bit compiles without error.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-13-2023, 09:42 AM   #449
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,130

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298Reputation: 7298
Quote:
LibreOffice 24.2 Beta1 is available for testing
By x1sc0. 13 December 2023.
LibreOffice 24.2 will be released as final at the beginning of February, 2024 ( Check the Release Plan ) being LibreOffice 24.2 Beta1 the second pre-release since the development of version 24.2 started in mid June, 2023. Since the previous release, LibreOffice 24.2 Alpha1, 425 commits have been submitted to the code repository and 137 issues got fixed. Check the release notes to find the new features included in this version of LibreOffice.......
The full announcement can be found at, https://qa.blog.documentfoundation.o...e-for-testing/

Last edited by cwizardone; 12-13-2023 at 09:43 AM.
 
Old 12-13-2023, 10:42 AM   #450
Bindestreck
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 820

Rep: Reputation: 440Reputation: 440Reputation: 440Reputation: 440Reputation: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by shelldweller View Post
I got this as well, but only on 32-bit, not 64-bit. I even tested on a clean fully-patched install, and I still hit the same error. Then, I tried compiling liblangtag separately and that spit out the same error in the same place. For whatever reason, liblangtag is not compiling on 32-bit. 64-bit compiles without error.
I tried same thing, and liblangtag itself gives the same error. What is interesting, I am using multilib, and not a pure 64bit environment...
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: LibreOffice 4.4 Released as the Most Beautiful LibreOffice Ever LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-30-2015 01:10 AM
LXer: LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice: Why LibreOffice Wins LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-29-2014 10:50 AM
How to install only Writer from Libreoffice package"libreoffice-4.0.3-i486-1alien.txz just.srad Slackware 10 05-30-2013 02:37 PM
LXer: Build Your Business Around LibreOffice, LibreOffice Certification Program Announced LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-07-2012 12:10 PM
LXer: LibreOffice Tips: Inserting Qurâ??an text in LibreOffice Writer LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-16-2012 02:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration