LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-17-2002, 12:42 AM   #31
scudjockey
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Unhappy startup


how do you start the GUI after logging on in Slackware?
using kde?
 
Old 03-17-2002, 01:06 AM   #32
Aussie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Brisvegas, Antipodes
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,590

Rep: Reputation: 58
Do "startx"
 
Old 03-17-2002, 08:02 PM   #33
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Rep: Reputation: 30
if you want kde, create a .xinitrc file in your user's home directory (if it hasn't been already created) and then add a line like this:

exec startkde



if there are other lines starting with the word 'exec', comment them out. if it is a new file, u just need the above line.

after you have saved the file, type startx at the command line to begin your kde session.



enjoy!
 
Old 03-22-2002, 06:42 PM   #34
hejduk
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slak 8.0
Posts: 39

Rep: Reputation: 15
i tried mandrake, but i had problems setting it up so i went with slack. i don't really think that there's a point to using linux if your not going to learn the nuts and bolts of the system. the whole reason i came over to linux is because i couldn't learn any thing about computers and software while using windoze. nothing against mandrake, but that's why i think slack is the best.
 
Old 03-22-2002, 09:07 PM   #35
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Rep: Reputation: 30
i agree that it's fun learning the nuts and bolts... but i really don't understand why people who use linux keep on saying stuff like there's no point to using linux if your not going to learn the nuts and bolts of the system.

i mean if we're advocating linux, then why are we leaving some people out? the average user (and take note of the word 'user') wants it for e-mails, internet access, office suite and games. u don't have to know the innards of the system to do all this. to most people, the computer is a tool, not an end in itself.

if we're gonna convince others that linux is worth their trouble, i think we gotta drop the elitist attitude and be more open to both users and people who are interested in learning more about linux.

Last edited by gui10; 03-22-2002 at 09:08 PM.
 
Old 03-22-2002, 11:09 PM   #36
Aussie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Brisvegas, Antipodes
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,590

Rep: Reputation: 58
Well said gui10, thats one of the reasons why I post here.
 
Old 04-01-2002, 04:20 PM   #37
RWallett
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Anchorage, AK
Distribution: Gentoo, Ubuntu and Slackware
Posts: 38

Rep: Reputation: 15
Talking Slackware vs. Mandrake

For Jonathan, who was asking about whether or not to try Slackware...

I'm a newbie, too, and I chose Slackware. I've since tried Caldera (on a second PC), but Slack is my primary Linux distro. Given the same choice again...I'd still go with Slackware. It's a great distribution. If you buy the CDs, they come with an EXCELLENT beginners guide for installing and using Slack. When you perform the installation, there are several menus that let you select what options you want to install. FTP, Telnet and Apache (web server) worked out of the box; I haven't touched the config files, and I use all three services all the time. I have since added the DNS daemon (for my LAN--it's a small network, but it's an educational toy...I mean TOOL )

Slackware is a little more difficult to learn, but not really that bad. I'm still having a few problems, though (I can't exit X Windows without resetting my computer... >:| ), but for the most part, Slackware is GREAT!!!


--Michael Wallette
 
Old 04-02-2002, 05:03 AM   #38
AutoBot
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: I can see you from here.
Distribution: Gentoo 1.3b
Posts: 184

Rep: Reputation: 34
Ctrl-alt-backspace to restart/shutdown X, and about MSN it does suck but I had it before I switched over to cable and you can get it to function, but I could never get it to connect at full capacity always at something like 28.8 or less strange but true.
 
Old 04-07-2002, 12:02 PM   #39
vikasreddy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Bangalore, INDIA
Distribution: Mandrake 8.1 and Windose Me( it was OEM)
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 15
Lightbulb

hey Half_elf
about the lilo.conf problem u had. well after editing and saving the file run lilo in command prompt. only then the modifications get configured. i hope u get my point coz i can't tell u anything more than I Don't KNOW as i am a newbie. but well that is what i did. hope it helped.
 
Old 04-07-2002, 06:10 PM   #40
ronss
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: phoenix,az
Distribution: red hat linux enterprise-centos
Posts: 766

Rep: Reputation: 31
i didn,t have no problem with lilo, though i got a warning message of possible problems loading on the mbr. everything running fine except for some of my ingnorance about the system at the moment. i also had a tough time figuring on how to get into the desktop, until i read about xf86 config and startx.well, slack if fast, faster than red hat or suse. opion is still out on slack, looks like i am going to have to learn how to install some software. my 2 cents worh
 
Old 06-03-2002, 11:56 PM   #41
Agrajag
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
kids and their slackware *sigh*

All you Slackware advocates - you really have no clue, do you. Slackware used to be a good distro 10 years ago when there was nothing else. Nowadays it's a piece of crap. Here's a scenario for you kiddies, I'll try to make it a bit simpler and easier than it really is so that you can understand: you compile (say, with the standard configure;make;make install procedure) a program (which didn't have a slackware "package" - i'll get to that later), and it's depencencies include something that another program depends on. Now. How do you go about removing this program? If you're "lucky" you might have a 'make uninstall' or similar. What about the dependency issues? You're screwed now aren't you. Slackware's package management is a joke. No serious admin is going to run slackware when his job would be lost because he screws up dependencies. Security fixes/bug updates are few and far between. Don't even get me started on slackware's init scripts.

To those of you (who seem to have the least clue), Linux is Linux is Linux. One distribution is not going to be "faster" than another.

Go for Debian. Debian is the most sensible of linux distro's by far. By sensible, I really mean the least stupid.

Now get out of your bedrooms and try running Slackware in a real world environment, and then come back and tell me how good it is.
</rant>

Agrajag
 
Old 06-04-2002, 12:37 AM   #42
DeadPuddle
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Asheville, NC
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 257

Rep: Reputation: 30
Treating people as if they know nothing and pretended you are a linux god makes you nothing more than a dickhead. Good day.
 
Old 06-04-2002, 12:56 AM   #43
Agrajag
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
kernal: where exactly did I pretend to be a "linux god"? I make no such claim. Do you usually make such comments with no real reason as to why you made them? Have you got any good reasons why any of my comments are wrong perhaps? Or is asking a Mandrake user to actually use his brain too much? I suppose it probably is.

Cheerio
 
Old 06-04-2002, 01:17 AM   #44
DeadPuddle
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Asheville, NC
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 257

Rep: Reputation: 30
I may use Mandrake now, but I've also used Slackware, Debian, and Red Hat. And calling me a Mandrake user not only disrespects me, but most of the people who use this board. Good day.
 
Old 06-04-2002, 01:26 AM   #45
Agrajag
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
HAHA! "Calling me a Mandrake user not only disrespects me" <--- do you realise what you just said?

It also came to my attention that you didn't answer any of my questions
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mandrake Vs Slackware. excidy Mandriva 5 04-04-2005 02:10 PM
Slackware vs Mandrake mapesju Slackware 19 01-20-2005 04:17 AM
from Slackware to Mandrake n_ganpat Mandriva 7 04-29-2004 06:13 AM
Slackware vs. Mandrake lonny Slackware 10 12-02-2003 12:09 PM
Uninstalled Mandrake, Installed Slackware, still getting mandrake boot screen powerismine Slackware 4 11-22-2002 06:51 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration