[SOLVED] [B]Can't Boot Windows Xp in a dual-boot e[/B]
UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Reboot. Should come up in XP. If it doesn't, then use your XP recovery console (or whatever) and do an fdisk /mbr to again rewrite the master boot record (though it looks OK now).
edit: This of course presumes that your XP partition really is on hda1 and not on hda5.
It sounds like you are already in much better hands than my own here. jiml8 has gone beyond me, but the advice he's offering here all makes perfect sense.
Also if gparted continues to identify the partition as unknown either (a) gparted is hosed or (b) you did not save the changes to the mbrimage.bin file or (c) you did not write the mbrimage.bin file back to hda.
Changing the 00 to an 80 makes the partition bootable; changing the 15 to 07 identifies it as ntfs.
GParted still idientifies hda1 as unknown file system. I am sorry, but I believe I did everything just like you wrote. But wasn't there the possibility that this partition should be as almost in the beggining as hda5 from the extended partition hda1?
Don't go back and edit a post after I've responded to it - particularly after you too have responded to it. Destroys coherency and pretty much guarantees that I'll miss the edit. Further, has the effect of suggesting that you had placed more information in the earlier post than you had in fact placed there.
Don't go back and edit a post after I've responded to it - particularly after you too have responded to it. Destroys coherency and pretty much guarantees that I'll miss the edit. Further, has the effect of suggesting that you had placed more information in the earlier post than you had in fact placed there.
GParted still idientifies hda1 as unknown file system. I am sorry, but I believe I did everything just like you wrote. But wasn't there the possibility that this partition should be as almost in the beggining as hda5 from the extended partition hda1?
Yes, that has been the question, hasn't it.
Your original post identifies it as an extended partition but you later said that originally it wasn't identified as an extended partition but as a primary partition until you did something or other. The mods I had you make turned it into a physical partition.
If rebooting didn't work then some further diagnosis is required.
First of all, did this system ever boot into XP with the current partition structure (rather, the partition structure identified in your first post)?
edit: sorry; I am using "physical" and "primary" interchangeably when I am referring to partitions. I shouldn't do that, but when I do what I mean is "primary" partition.
Your original post identifies it as an extended partition but you later said that originally it wasn't identified as an extended partition but as a primary partition until you did something or other. The mods I had you make turned it into a physical partition.
If rebooting didn't work then some further diagnosis is required.
First of all, did this system ever boot into XP with the current partition structure (rather, the partition structure identified in your first post)?
edit: sorry; I am using "physical" and "primary" interchangeably when I am referring to partitions. I shouldn't do that, but when I do what I mean is "primary" partition.
I believe so, but know that you ask me, maybe after going through the partitioning step of the Ubuntu installation, the system turned hda1 into hda1 extended and made the windows partition hda5 I don't know how.
But since I was able to mount the windows partition when it was hda5, maybe I need to make it back that way.
I had it like hda5 and it was mountable before I did the changes to menu.lst: the ones with lots of "hide"s.
i now know that i should not edit the posts, but more important, what should I do now?
Have you read my post: "Today, 06:05 PM"?
Yes.
Did you try to do an fdisk /mbr to reload the XP boot code again? With a screwed partition table, it might not have gone in right before.
Again, did this configuration ever successfully boot into XP? In other words, should we assume that hda1 is indeed an extended partition and the system is on hda5?
I am a newbie, so, I don't know what to do know. Even to try and make hda1 extended and hda5 the windows partition, if that is the best thing to try...
Did you try to do an fdisk /mbr to reload the XP boot code again? With a screwed partition table, it might not have gone in right before.
Again, did this configuration ever successfully boot into XP? In other words, should we assume that hda1 is indeed an extended partition and the system is on hda5?
I did not try any fdisk /mbr command: just the fixmbr as told before.
About:
"Again, did this configuration ever successfully boot into XP? In other words, should we assume that hda1 is indeed an extended partition and the system is on hda5?"
I believe so, regarding the fact that I was able to mount the xp partition when it was as hda5 while using the live cd just as I am doing now...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.