LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Puppy
User Name
Password
Puppy This forum is for the discussion of Puppy Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-24-2011, 06:13 AM   #1
brian111
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
Reluctantly Going Back to XP


I use a fairly low spec laptop (Dell Inspiron 4100 with 256MB RAM) to stream music from my NAS drive, and hoping to reduce the start-up time I set up a dual boot into Puppy Lupu 5.2.8. Everything works, but I haven't been able to find a media player that works consistently; the best to date is the default GNOME/mplayer which can create playlists by drag/dropping folders containing subfolders, and generally doesn't stutter during playback. However it often crashes (silent) during playback of a long-ish playlist – after a variable time usually around half an hour.
Reluctantly I've concluded I'm better off running XP/Windows Media Player on the same machine and using Hibernate to speed the start-up; once it starts to play a playlist it neither stutters nor crashes. I'm a bit surprised my Linux solution isn't more robust than XP on the same hardware.
Any thoughts?
Brian
 
Old 11-24-2011, 07:32 AM   #2
pupfan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi Brian111.

Have you tried the music player deadbeef? I am not sure it does playlists myself. I do know its very low on resource usage.

I like it cuz i can add everything in a folder or directory & it will play them without issue.
 
Old 11-24-2011, 09:59 AM   #3
jim1911
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Deadbeef

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupfan View Post
Hi Brian111.

Have you tried the music player deadbeef? I am not sure it does playlists myself. I do know its very low on resource usage.

I like it cuz i can add everything in a folder or directory & it will play them without issue.
I also like it, I believe that pemasu's deadbeef.pet at http://smokey01.com/pemasu/Pets/ will work with 5.2.8.
 
Old 11-24-2011, 11:54 AM   #4
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,627

Rep: Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651Reputation: 2651
Quote:
I'm a bit surprised my Linux solution isn't more robust than XP on the same hardware.
let's see
xp -- a 10+ year old OS built and designed for hardware from 1998

any modern OS ( this includes Win7 )

built and designed for MODERN hardware

have you looked at Damn Small Linux ?
or CentOS 5.7 or the much older 4.9
 
Old 11-24-2011, 12:05 PM   #5
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
For a purpose like yours I personally would go for a minimal install with just the needed packages installed. Since I don't want to fiddle much with it I would use Debian for it, install a simple environment (a simple WM or may be LXDE) and then the music-player of your choice ( I usually use Audacious, don't need no extras, only want to play music with a music player). And of course you can use suspend or hibernation on Linux also.
 
Old 11-24-2011, 02:09 PM   #6
jpeters
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 16
Try mplayer instead. Using gnome adds about 125M. Lucid requires a little more RAM..you could try Wary. Also, run with the "nocopy" option so the OS doesn't load into RAM. I run old dell laptops, but pay the extra $20 to upgrade to 1gig....even then, I'll turn off unnecessary processes. Puppy will run much faster even on an old laptop than XP(or win7) will on a new computer.

Last edited by jpeters; 11-24-2011 at 02:13 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-24-2011, 02:20 PM   #7
Doc CPU
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099

Rep: Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV View Post
xp -- a 10+ year old OS built and designed for hardware from 1998

any modern OS ( this includes Win7 )
Windows 7 isn't an OS - it's a natural disaster. If you ask me, Windows XP is the latest Windows that may qualify as an OS. All its successors (Vista, Seven) just drive you into insanity.

[X] Doc CPU
 
Old 11-24-2011, 02:38 PM   #8
Amdx2_x64
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Distribution: Left LQ. Mods are too Rude!
Posts: 598

Rep: Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc CPU View Post
Hi there,



Windows 7 isn't an OS - it's a natural disaster. If you ask me, Windows XP is the latest Windows that may qualify as an OS. All its successors (Vista, Seven) just drive you into insanity.

[X] Doc CPU
Disaster? Wait until Windows 8.
 
Old 11-24-2011, 03:34 PM   #9
jonyo
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Distribution: looking at VectorLinux 6.0 Light, PCLinuxOS phoenix
Posts: 195

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
i use whatever works and makes my life easier, for lotsa stuff, it's win hands down end of story

might have a look a at these though

Last edited by jonyo; 11-24-2011 at 03:38 PM.
 
Old 11-24-2011, 06:51 PM   #10
grump
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I've settled on Audacious in Slacko 5.3 - can drag and drop folders to make playlists - but the longest I have so far is about 40 songs, so can't tell how it goes with REALLY BIG lists.

First post BTW - another refugee from Murga-Linux. I'll post an intro later.
 
Old 11-24-2011, 07:55 PM   #11
edoc
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 1
Let's see, five laptops and two netbooks ... all on Puppy Linux - Squeeze 5x9 - all working fine and meeting every need.

I don't have to pay for the OS, I don't have to worry about boatloads of MS-specific viruses, and I don't put money in the pocket of Bill Gates.

It's all good here in Linuxville ...
 
Old 11-24-2011, 08:29 PM   #12
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,143
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481
Gnome-Mplayer is a resource hog on 256MB of ram without a /swap partition which the OP failed to post in detail on installation of Puppy 528. He would have been better served using either GogglesMM,Qmmp,or Xmms on 256MB of ram.

The stuttering was probably caused by no /swap partiton and running Puppy in ram also. Instead of a pxfix=noram option for boot on a full install. Like I said. No details were giving on how Puppy was installed on a 256MB ram Laptop. By the way. Windows XP uses Virtual Memory and was a full install. My guess was Puppy was installed frugally and ran in ram with GnomeMplayer running.

No skips

Attachment 8473

Last edited by rokytnji; 12-09-2011 at 01:23 PM.
 
Old 11-25-2011, 03:23 AM   #13
brian111
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I see I've stirred up some reaction! Thanks for the various suggestions - I may well try the other media player options as it would still be nice to avoid the interminable anti-virus hassle.
My install is Frugal Puppy with a .5GB swap partition.
Here's what a 'top' memory looks like when GNOME/mplayer is running:
Mem: 191676K used, 63536K free, 0K shrd, 5668K buff, 62440K cached
Brian
 
Old 11-25-2011, 07:41 AM   #14
brian111
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I've now installed Deadbeef; so far so good...
Brian
 
Old 11-25-2011, 09:51 AM   #15
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,143
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481Reputation: 3481
Try giving your boot parameter the pfix=noram option also so Puppy does not run in ram. Look at the wary thread in this section of forum. I posted my /boot/grub/menu.lst there to show what I mean.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] how to run 2 bash command back-to-back in bourneShell nass Slackware 7 10-10-2011 05:23 PM
Minicom not working I connected linux machines back-to-back Prabhunath Linux - Networking 2 06-30-2010 04:39 AM
Can't log back in after changing runlevels from init 3 to 1 back to 3 manwichmakesameal Slackware 5 06-29-2009 11:36 AM
Connecting 2 linux computer back to back with cross cable. michalng Linux - Networking 8 02-11-2009 07:00 AM
LXer: Australia reluctantly contributes to open source LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-15-2005 10:46 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Puppy

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration