PuppyThis forum is for the discussion of Puppy Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just became a Puppy user after 5 years with Linspire/Freespire. I moved to Puppy 4.1.2 because Freespire was not reading my .wav files and I couldnt fix it.
In less than 2 hours time I had Puppy reading ALL files I had and also got tightvnc installed and running to my telephone server and also got it connected to my LAN and into the internet and one of my printers working. That must be some kind of a record for ease of installation.
Puppy is touted as being small and for old computers. Mine is a newer computer and I see no limitations in Puppy because of its size.
Yeah,...
I keep Puppy 4.1.2 on a couple of computers...and I use it more than any other OS. I like to try out different distros and stuff,...but I always know I can fall back on, and count on Puppy!
well check out betapup420 I have a custom build that rocks it comes with two windows manager icewm check out woof and build a custom ubuntu or Slackware or Debian or arch pup. puppy been around since 2005 and Barry does a good job but he is retiring.
I have to chime in with just a couple of agreeing comments.
I have used Puppy on and off since 2.0. I used to use it only on old equipment because I felt it was a little too limited for my main needs, but still a great little distro. I have just in the last couple of days tried 4.2 on a Medion Netbook with the standard netbook specs (Atom N270, 1GB mem, Ralink 2860 wireless, Intel graphics, HDA Sound). EVERYTHING worked immediately and, like all Puppies, it runs from RAM so it is blazingly fast. I am truly stunned.
I have two netbooks, an AAO (which I believe is a superior build to the Medion) which runs Ubuntu Jaunty. I realize that running from the hard drive like Jaunty does is going to limit the speed, but the difference is absolutely incredible.
I haven't figured out the webcam or microphone yet, but that will come. Puppy is a keeper for this little netbook.
I unserstand that Barry is retiring and will no longer develop Puppy. But with the quality and popularity of this distro, I cannot see it fading away. I believe the community would not let that happen.
Puppy does indeed rock. I have been using Puppy since 2.0 and at that time everyone was talking about how great Knoppix was. When I ran into trouble and needed a rescue disk I tried Knoppix of course and it just couldn't do what I needed, so I tried Puppy and it worked no problem. That's when I fell in love with the pup, and it continues to get better with each release.
All computers should come with Puppy preinstalled on the mother board similar to Asus Express Gate.
Actually, yes, it does. While it's true that running as root is one less layer of Linux security, it still has the rest- priorities & permissions, data execution prevention, etc.
BTW- I don't know when it was added, but Pup 4.20 includes a firewall.
I should have looked which forum this was. I have a habit of replying from the rss recent list and not noticing which forum it is (gets me into trouble at times offering the wrong advice in the slackware forum). I didn't realize I was in a puppy forum. I'm usually not such a troll.
P.S. Dragonslayer48dx. I like your sig. It know the feeling. I just turned 50 this year.
I should have looked which forum this was. I have a habit of replying from the rss recent list and not noticing which forum it is (gets me into trouble at times offering the wrong advice in the slackware forum). I didn't realize I was in a puppy forum. I'm usually not such a troll.
Actually, I considered your post to be a valid question and opinion, considering your title [Guru]. I am curious though what all the hoopla's about, considering that even root has limited (or no) direct access to system files. (unlike with Windows)
Off topic reply:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschiwal
P.S. Dragonslayer48dx. I like your sig. I know the feeling. I just turned 50 this year.
50?? Hell, you're still a young pup. I can barely remember being 50!
Cheers
Last edited by DragonSlayer48DX; 06-07-2009 at 07:23 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.