LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604
Original Poster
Rep:
The ability to disable was in reference to the proposed reputation system (No decision has been made on that yet, but if it is implemented the ability to completely opt out would be available during the initial roll out).
If there's a thumbs up button, I demand a thumbs down button.
I'd agree, it's getting rather cluttered on LQ with these little things to choose from in each thread, post, etc. I can see this icon and thumbs up being misused for it's actual intention or not being used at all, especially since it's right next to the quote button.
Can one take away a Thanks if accidentally pushed?
@archtoad6, you can turn the sigs off. An example of jeremy listening to "feedback" - I suspect I was one of the first users when he made this option available.
I am only aware of being able to suppress my own sig. for specific posts. What have I missed? I trust it's not some all-or-nothing thing in my user controls; which, BTW, I have just searched again.
While I was reviewing my user controls, I turned my attention to my own sig. block, which always comes out in a larger font than I want. Currently, I have the majority of it inside [SIZE="1"][/SIZE] tags, but it makes only a minor difference in the way it is displayed. What I want is that my sig. is in the same font & size as the member info. to the left of my post. Is there any current way to achieve this?
Thanks for the info. -- I missed that option earlier today. &, yes, it does unfortunately fit my idea of "all-or-nothing". -- What I would like to see is ability to on-the-fly "collapse", i.e. suppress, only those sig.s I find obnoxious. My 2 hot buttons being vertical size & in-your-face religious or political sentiments. Up 'til now I have usually dealt w/ those by putting the "offending" parties on my ignore list; unfortunately this is also an "all-or-nothing" approach that hides useful info.
Last edited by archtoad6; 01-06-2009 at 07:26 AM.
Reason: more typos
I would propose to combine this with marking the thread as "solved" and change the thread title color or somewhat similar, this makes it much easier to recognize the question does no longer need attention or is useful if one has a similar problem.
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,631
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc.nice
I would propose to combine this with marking the thread as "solved" and change the thread title color or somewhat similar, this makes it much easier to recognize the question does no longer need attention or is useful if one has a similar problem.
Good idea, in particular the color scheme. Seconded.
Please, don't implement that. It is not useful at all. I saw it on other forums and never realized what it is good for.
For the "thumb up" feature: thanks. I think it is the best way to say thanks to somebody.
I read that some members here don't like it, so I have a suggestion here: Why not to add a check box like this to the user CP: "don't show user acknowledges in forums" This would auto-collapse all "thanks" sections of all posts for the user.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.