Confusion on what is and what is not a "text speak garbage"
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I don't see how your post can possibly be offensive.
Good. Thank you. Had some unpleasant experiences in the past, so, as they say, better safe than sorry. So, carry on old-timers, I'm going to the newbie forum to see if I can help someone today.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
I figure if the post looks like my 13 year old nephew typed the post on his phone then...
But mostly seeing as this is a multi lingual forum . Posts should be able to be translated ( google or bablefish).
Common acronyms should translate . Things like IMHO and WTF or RTFM are common
now a post like say
Quote:
u no th1s "Pls hlp me in finding the bst OS for running on an old hw"
the above supplanted leet 1337
Quote:
"0MFG D00D /\Ü571N 15 T3H l_l83Я 1337 Я0XX0ЯZ"
also would not be fine
now i am a VERY bad speller ( like many) so that i do not care about much .
BUT if a nun would hit your hand with a ruler for the post then -- something IS wrong with it .
No of course not :-] One second worth of searching LQ, either using our own search engine or one of the popular ones, should show hits in excess of 500 so that establishes use of the TLA as common enough to not be offended by it.
All in all, I believe this is a question about opinion. What is text speak garbage to one person, will be completely readable to another, and that person might *not even realize* that they had raed something that was cmopleltey undecipherable to oterhs. If the text is actually urnedalbe to you, then you have no incentive to interact with the person that posted it, and that in itself is a powerful deterrent to text or leet speak. Perhaps a reminder above the edit box for new members would help here.
However, If this really were a big problem, the owner LQ would have installed an auto-text filter that expands "pls" into "please" and "nvm" into "nevermind" OR would have a detection mechanism that would have the posts kicked back to the poster with a message "Please do not use text-speak, swearing or abbreviations. Your message was not posted. Try again."
But he hasn't. He has left it in the capable hands of the moderators to decide on a case by case basis what is and isn't a readable message. And I for one think that is fine.
As a suggestion: I think it should *only* be the moderators to tell a member that their message is unreadable and please try again, rather than regular members sending a barrage of "speak correctly" and "spell out your words" messages that quickly fill up a thread. My advice: If you can't read it, don't answer it. Don't fill up a thread with put downs and "speak correctly" messages which quickly derail an already hard to understand post.
The problem here is that the thread most likely will not only be read by the members participating in the thread, but also by people with a similar problem searching the net for a solution. It would be a pity if that person can't decipher the solution to his problems due to text-speak.
It would be a pity if that person can't decipher the solution to his problems due to text-speak.
It would be a pity if an OP was too afraid to ask for clarification of terms/acronyms they don't understand. That kind of fear will likely keep them from every being good at what they do. Sure there is the occasional troll that will attack a newbie as if the troll was born knowing everything but for the most part those of us that respond do so because we want to help so a request for clarification usually works. (The occasions where it doesn't work are often when a newbie has been told the same thing at least twice and was asked for more information but instead chooses to ignore posts and ask something completely new.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.