Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
Interesting. I just tried what ntubski said in post #2, and one of the addons was re-enabled. It also gives me the option to re-enable the rest of them too.
Being, setting the xpinstall.signatures.required setting to "false" in about:config
Did you do that Hazel, or did they just automatically re-enable?
The one and only add-on installed is the download helper add-on.
Firefox popped up a window saying:
And the download helper button/icon was removed from the GUI.
So, I think it's time now to get rid of Firefox.
I just don't like that perverted ugly new mainstream definition of FREEDOM.
Signing of add-ons was introduced as a security measure, probably a very decent one given the threats out there. Where Mozilla royally mucked up was in not renewing the certificate. They will take a good deal of flak, rightfully, for that.
But if you want to over-react and whizz off to another browser then please exercise your freedom to do so. Have fun, but watch out that you may end up running out of browsers to choose from if you ditch them any time something goes wrong.
Windows 66.0.3 has updated. 60.6.1 esr (64-bit) on this desktop hasn't, yet, 'tho I did have the "Allow Firefox to install and run studies" turned off here.
As a test, I just turned off "Allow Firefox to install and run studies", and my addons are still enabled.
Yes, the "fix" link said we could do that once the fix had been applied...it only needed to be turned on to allow the quick fix to happen. It was already on on my Windows box, so although I had the banner when I went to it, it disappeared and all add-ons were OK at first refresh of a page.
Still waiting here.
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux 16.04, Debian 10, LineageOS 14.1
Posts: 1,572
Rep:
Tor Browser 8.0.8 will not allow Firefox to install and run studies. So, the NoScript add-on is broken on it. Hopefully in their next update it will be fixed.
Signing of add-ons was introduced as a security measure, probably a very decent one given the threats out there. Where Mozilla royally mucked up was in not renewing the certificate. They will take a good deal of flak, rightfully, for that.
But if you want to over-react and whizz off to another browser then please exercise your freedom to do so. Have fun, but watch out that you may end up running out of browsers to choose from if you ditch them any time something goes wrong.
I have been in doubt with the use Firefox for some time and several reasons now, so this would be just an additional point to switch the browser. I have disabled all the security updates plus anything else related in any manner to security etc.pp. and I even switched all that xpinstall.XXX stuff to false. I'm running as root and I'm almost all time on the internet without to use a firewall.
I never had any trouble (mainly because I'm a careful person, not clicking on everything that blinks and pops up etc.pp.).
I want to decide when and if to disable ANYTHING that I had installed. And I want to be the ONLY one who takes power on such decisions. I don't need Liars to prevent me for doing stupid things and to secure me when being online!
This is not my definition of FREEDOM. This is just censorship and dictatorship.
I have been in doubt with the use Firefox for some time and several reasons now, so this would be just an additional point to switch the browser. I have disabled all the security updates plus anything else related in any manner to security etc.pp. and I even switched all that xpinstall.XXX stuff to false. I'm running as root and I'm almost all time on the internet without to use a firewall.
I never had any trouble (mainly because I'm a careful person, not clicking on everything that blinks and pops up etc.pp.).
I want to decide when and if to disable ANYTHING that I had installed. And I want to be the ONLY one who takes power on such decisions. I don't need Liars to prevent me for doing stupid things and to secure me when being online!
This is not my definition of FREEDOM. This is just censorship and dictatorship.
Ah, so security is not a priority of yours then. Fair enough. The thing is, it is a priority (and should be) for mostly everyone else.
You're definitely right that you should find another browser. I'm sure you'll find one more to your tastes though. Good luck.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.