LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2016, 11:24 PM   #1
FiFi R
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Linux Lite 2.8 32bit and my 2.6 32bit on another PC not updating anymore, can not FETCH depository, need help!


Linux Lite 2.8 32bit and my 2.6 32bit on another PC not updating anymore, can not FETCH depository, need help!
 
Old 03-12-2016, 04:32 AM   #2
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925
What error message are you seeing?
 
Old 03-12-2016, 02:42 PM   #3
FiFi R
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
when I click on updates and then click the yes the updates seem to be loading fine, but the a error message that simply says unable to FETCH lists is returned, nothing else except for a box with OK to check. Anyway after fighting with this for several days I have replaced the operating systems on both machines because even though these are only backup PC'c for various family members to use, I do sometimes need to use these for accessing some critical law enforcement issues related to my employment and is the main purpose of these backup machines. I really did like the Linux Lite because of it's simplicity and also because everything worked perfectly with the old hardware right out of the box unlike previously installed O.S.'s.

Appreciate your comeback and would still like to know about any solutions to this, I can easily reinstall Lite
 
Old 03-12-2016, 03:37 PM   #4
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925
It is strange that both systems, running different o/s versions, should suddenly start showing the same error at the same time.

Had you just upgraded them? Were you able to access the internet properly otherwise? Had you been experiencing any other sort of internet problems or slowdown?

I'm not very knowledgeable about Linux Lite, but until someone else steps in and if you decide to re-install Linux Lite and pursue the problem, can you please paste the output from

Code:
inxi -r
Which o/s have you replaced Linux Lite with on both machines?
 
Old 03-12-2016, 05:07 PM   #5
FiFi R
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Linux Lite Updates

I posted in the Newbies Forum because I am relatively new to Linux Lite, I have used Linux Distributions for about three years. Main purpose of switching to Lite is because it supported all of the legacy hardware on these old systems right out of the box. Previous distributions used all had failures in this respect.
And yes the 2.8 version on one of the PC's was upgraded to 2.8 from the originally installed 2.6 version. Some clarity here is I also downloaded 2 new ISO images , a 64bit and a 32bit from Sourceforge net and installed on the newer of the 2 PC's, and this update problem still occurs with the new image installed.
You ask what O.S I have reverted to. On the newer dual core Microsoft X has been installed, the 3.2 GHz Pent IV the Linux Mint has been installed, both of these O.S. are working well, with the exception of the Mint not being able to support the legacy floppy drive in the old Pentium everything else works perfectly. However both of these PC's had a much better benchmark when running Linux Lite versions, and now seem real sluggish in comparison. not to impressed with the performance of the current installations .

Thanks again for your come Back.
 
Old 03-12-2016, 08:16 PM   #6
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925
No problem. Just so I can understand this, did you ever get updates to work on either of the two Linux Lite systems?
 
Old 03-12-2016, 09:17 PM   #7
FiFi R
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Updates were working fine on both systems when first installed in 2015 until recently when they both stopped working ??????????? )o;
 
Old 03-12-2016, 10:24 PM   #8
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
Can they access the internet? Is networking operational other than the updates?

I don't know how Linux Lite does updates, so I have no other suggestions.
 
Old 03-13-2016, 06:46 AM   #9
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925
Did you have any PPAs added to the repositories? The Google Chrome one has been borked as of late if you had Chrome installed, which may have been the error message you saw.
 
Old 03-13-2016, 09:07 AM   #10
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
Chrome has been working fine for me, running Debian. I've had no issues with updating it.
 
Old 03-13-2016, 09:16 AM   #11
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgosnell View Post
Chrome has been working fine for me, running Debian. I've had no issues with updating it.
Thanks for the info, sgosnell.

For the past week or two, I've been getting the following error from the Chrome repository in question:

W: Failed to fetch http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/de...stable/Release Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-i386/Packages' in Release file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)

It had worked fine previously to this.

A quick browse of the internet shows that I'm not the only one experiencing the problem.
 
Old 03-13-2016, 02:20 PM   #12
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
Chrome is no longer available for 32-bit systems. I don't know if that's your problem. I'm on Sid, and that could also be a factor. I haven't tried updating chrome on Jessie for awhile. I don't update Jessie that often, because there aren't many updates available.
 
Old 03-13-2016, 02:49 PM   #13
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgosnell View Post
Chrome is no longer available for 32-bit systems. I don't know if that's your problem. I'm on Sid, and that could also be a factor. I haven't tried updating chrome on Jessie for awhile. I don't update Jessie that often, because there aren't many updates available.
Thanks. My system is 64-bit so I have no idea why I was affected. However I've now reinstalled Chrome and all is working well. Perhaps this is the error message that OP was seeing, given that he was running two 32-bit systems that had updated well up until very recently?
 
Old 03-13-2016, 03:51 PM   #14
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
Could be. Google has decided to stop supporting 32-bit systems entirely with Chrome. There should be no updates available.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] What 32Bit Linux for Netbook? NotAComputerGuy Linux - Newbie 10 04-13-2014 03:53 AM
[SOLVED] centos5 both 32bit glibc and 64 glibc exist, how to delete the 32bit version zousheng Linux - Newbie 2 04-03-2013 09:17 AM
Installing VMWare Workstation 7.x (32bit) on Mint 14 (32bit) 8trak Linux - Newbie 4 01-24-2013 08:35 PM
Fedora 13 32bit and then Linux Mint 32bit and then Ubuntu 10.04 32bit ciao303 Linux - Newbie 3 08-09-2010 11:03 PM
no 32bit color in linux? kryptobs2000 Linux - General 4 03-01-2005 08:52 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration