Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've got a PII 400 machine that I want to put Linux on. I am rather keen on using SUSE or Redhat(Fedora). And I would like to install the bare minimum i.e. essentials only (although would be nice to run X11 but i'm equally happy with command prompt) so that I can get a decent performance from this aging machine.
Should I choose an older version like redhat 6.2 but patch the kernel to the latest version etc. Or just go along with Redora Core2? I've heard that the newer versions of GUI like KDE/GNOME is quite mem/CPU intensive so it may run really slowly on a PII 400.
Please give me some advice or just simply point me to a URL and I'll follow it up.
Please keep in mind, I am a newbie (~10 months on linux) and this is only my opinion...
I would go with Fedora Core 1. I installed this on a dell latitude Cpi (266Mhz) WITH the GUI, and it ran well. The GUI option kind of depends on your RAM, the Cpi had 256M so it was okay. If you've only got 128, you can try it, but it may be a bit sluggish...
Personally, I'd wait on FC2. I just upgraded, only to find out there';s still some kinks to be worked out. Go with FC1, and wait until FC2 is in a little better shape.
well if you have to go GUI I would probably stick with a lightweight WM likc XFCE, fvwm, blackbox, or fluxbox (and lets not forget Afterstep). Gnome / KDE are certainly not the end all / be all of WM.
Also it would probably be helpful to get good video hardware so that you can reduce the memory footprint and cpu needs of the x server.
Without X you still have curses (ncurses?) and such so it certainly isn't necessary. Is the machine to be a client type box or are you looking to create a router / print server / file server / ... ?
** edit **
I know you specified FC and Suse but given that it's old hardware you may want to look at more tailorable distros such as debian, gentoo, or LFS. Just my $0.02.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.