LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


View Poll Results: Do You Compile Your Own Kernel or Use The One Shipped With Your Distribution?
I compile my own kernel (official tree) 51 17.47%
I compile my own kernel (other tree) 6 2.05%
I use the kernel shipped with my distribution 223 76.37%
Other 12 4.11%
Voters: 292. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2016, 09:59 AM   #121
johnniedoo
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT17.3 Mate, Cinnamon , Mint MATE 18.1
Posts: 73

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Kernel compiling


I have recently upgraded my first Linux Mint 17 windows dual boot machine to windows10 and Mint 18 dual boot due to some original errors i made with the Mint 17 installation when that first became available-or I noticed it and decided to try Linux for the first time with mint 17. the errors I made trying to make the AMd proprietary drivers work and egregious copy/paste without looking first errors made the upgrade to Mint 18 seem like a good idea.
as everyone probably knows by now, the kernel upgrading is a built in option and I did stop the upgrade on its own immediately -or after it did it once.
however. prior to this move to mint 18, I upgraded every machine i changed over to linux-all Mint 17.3 by now- and 2 are Mate, and one is cinnamon -meta -mate which i did somehow or other after i put cinnamon in from the live cd and didnt like the interface as much as Mate.
I have one fairly old Toshiba A215 s74xx laptop that i put mint 17 and now up to 17.3 and took the kernel up to 3.19.058 and there it has stayed for 10months or thereabouts.
I think i replied to this already but it was before i upgraded to mint 18. and noticed that the kernel upgrading was easily managed through update manager
I also used "kernelupdate" application once. was too fast tracked for my very newbie status. I took my kernel upgrades only to try to make some hardware function, or function better if i read posts regarding one or 2 of the older-or brand new- pieces of hardware i had in a specific machine might be addressed in a newer kernel. I also went backwards once or twice as well to try to regain functionality
john
 
Old 11-04-2016, 10:13 AM   #122
j42cpw
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2016
Location: Texas America
Distribution: fedora 19-23
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
recompiles on kernels

It has been some 8-12 years since I was forced to recompile kernels. I use fedora releases. My most mature laptop is version 19 (64 bit) with 4 recomplies from yum. My latest is version 25 beta going to release this month on an Atom (32 bit). Right now, all I have is Dell, I did not succeed in an install on an HP having been delivered with Windows 10.
 
Old 11-05-2016, 12:34 AM   #123
nigelc
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Mageia 7
Posts: 406
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 80
I have have only done it once. That was on a 486, Redhat 5.2 and a whole lot of second hand bits and pieces.
 
Old 11-06-2016, 03:09 AM   #124
dustyz16
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2016
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
For some odd-ball reason, I get the newer kernels which do require compiling. I'm "floating between 4.4.5 and 4.4.23. I have 4.7.0-4.7.4 but only use the 4.7.x series on the "thing" (test box) to put it thru the its paces. I suppose I like to torture myself with these constant (1 or 2 times a month) kernel compiles. I do every now and then set some option that when booting gives me to "can't find root" type of error msg, then halts. Back to the response dodger666's reply: Yes, there wasn't the loadable modules we have now. Although, at some point, I don't remember when, there was a patch that you did to put it in the kernel. Very simple compared to the loadable module system we have now. Oh, 1 last thing: If anybody is wondering about me "fubar'ing" my system, the answer is yes. I'm my own worst user on my 5 systems (2 laptops and 3 desktops. My Stable system is not connected to internet of any of my other systems. That one is for real work, not screwing around with software etc...
 
Old 11-06-2016, 04:49 AM   #125
wpeckham
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS, Manjaro
Posts: 5,763

Rep: Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764Reputation: 2764
Once upon a time I ENJOYED compiling a new kernel, it made a smaller, faster, more targeted kernel for my hardware.
I do not have that much time to waste these days, and there is less advantage. Now I either use the most recent distribution kernel or the newest OpenVZ kernel. Since the OpenVZ kernel is falling so far behind (apparently the company pulled the paid developers off of it, slowing things WAY down) I forsee having to depend upon distribution kernels ONLY at some point. Not just yet, but soon.
 
Old 11-07-2016, 01:18 AM   #126
JZL240I-U
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,634

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustyz16 View Post
...I get the newer kernels which do require compiling. I'm "floating" between 4.4.5 and 4.4.23. I have 4.7.0-4.7.4 but only use the 4.7.x series ...
Huh? openSUSE's tumbleweed comes as of yesterday evening with 4.8.6-1...
 
Old 11-07-2016, 06:00 AM   #127
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
Quote:
Originally Posted by JZL240I-U View Post
Huh? openSUSE's tumbleweed comes as of yesterday evening with 4.8.6-1...
The kernel is up to 4.9 now .
 
Old 11-07-2016, 06:06 AM   #128
JZL240I-U
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,634

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
4.9-rc4 as your own link shows. 4.8.6 is the latest stable kernel in case dustyz16 needs something solid .
 
Old 11-07-2016, 06:16 AM   #129
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
Quote:
Originally Posted by JZL240I-U View Post
4.9-rc4 as your own link shows.
Who knows how many rc versions will appear in the life of this thread?
 
Old 11-07-2016, 08:04 AM   #130
JZL240I-U
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,634

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Linus?
 
Old 11-07-2016, 08:47 AM   #131
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
Quote:
Originally Posted by JZL240I-U View Post
Linus?
I think he would be p***ed off at my speculatinmg about s*** I know nothing about.
 
Old 11-07-2016, 08:52 AM   #132
JZL240I-U
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,634

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Ah. I didn't say "ask him" I said he might know.
 
Old 11-17-2016, 11:11 AM   #133
Crippled
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Distribution: MX Linux 21.3 Xfce
Posts: 595

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
"Do You Compile Your Own Kernel or Use The One Shipped With Your Distribution?" I don't know how to compile anything. I use what comes with MX-15.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
change the shipped kernel on a Live CD scmbg Linux - Kernel 1 10-31-2008 12:28 AM
cannot re-compile fedora8 distribution kernel bjharker Fedora 1 09-19-2008 08:54 PM
Compile Wine to be distribution independent ? Dark Carnival Linux - Software 0 11-28-2007 04:38 AM
sound driver shipped in kernel, not listed in xconfig reetep Linux - General 4 01-29-2004 03:25 PM
Slackware 8.1 shipped? lto Slackware 7 07-15-2002 12:47 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration