Do You Compile Your Own Kernel or Use The One Shipped With Your Distribution?
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Do You Compile Your Own Kernel or Use The One Shipped With Your Distribution?
Distribution: MINT17.3 Mate, Cinnamon , Mint MATE 18.1
Posts: 73
Rep:
Kernel compiling
I have recently upgraded my first Linux Mint 17 windows dual boot machine to windows10 and Mint 18 dual boot due to some original errors i made with the Mint 17 installation when that first became available-or I noticed it and decided to try Linux for the first time with mint 17. the errors I made trying to make the AMd proprietary drivers work and egregious copy/paste without looking first errors made the upgrade to Mint 18 seem like a good idea.
as everyone probably knows by now, the kernel upgrading is a built in option and I did stop the upgrade on its own immediately -or after it did it once.
however. prior to this move to mint 18, I upgraded every machine i changed over to linux-all Mint 17.3 by now- and 2 are Mate, and one is cinnamon -meta -mate which i did somehow or other after i put cinnamon in from the live cd and didnt like the interface as much as Mate.
I have one fairly old Toshiba A215 s74xx laptop that i put mint 17 and now up to 17.3 and took the kernel up to 3.19.058 and there it has stayed for 10months or thereabouts.
I think i replied to this already but it was before i upgraded to mint 18. and noticed that the kernel upgrading was easily managed through update manager
I also used "kernelupdate" application once. was too fast tracked for my very newbie status. I took my kernel upgrades only to try to make some hardware function, or function better if i read posts regarding one or 2 of the older-or brand new- pieces of hardware i had in a specific machine might be addressed in a newer kernel. I also went backwards once or twice as well to try to regain functionality
john
It has been some 8-12 years since I was forced to recompile kernels. I use fedora releases. My most mature laptop is version 19 (64 bit) with 4 recomplies from yum. My latest is version 25 beta going to release this month on an Atom (32 bit). Right now, all I have is Dell, I did not succeed in an install on an HP having been delivered with Windows 10.
For some odd-ball reason, I get the newer kernels which do require compiling. I'm "floating between 4.4.5 and 4.4.23. I have 4.7.0-4.7.4 but only use the 4.7.x series on the "thing" (test box) to put it thru the its paces. I suppose I like to torture myself with these constant (1 or 2 times a month) kernel compiles. I do every now and then set some option that when booting gives me to "can't find root" type of error msg, then halts. Back to the response dodger666's reply: Yes, there wasn't the loadable modules we have now. Although, at some point, I don't remember when, there was a patch that you did to put it in the kernel. Very simple compared to the loadable module system we have now. Oh, 1 last thing: If anybody is wondering about me "fubar'ing" my system, the answer is yes. I'm my own worst user on my 5 systems (2 laptops and 3 desktops. My Stable system is not connected to internet of any of my other systems. That one is for real work, not screwing around with software etc...
Once upon a time I ENJOYED compiling a new kernel, it made a smaller, faster, more targeted kernel for my hardware.
I do not have that much time to waste these days, and there is less advantage. Now I either use the most recent distribution kernel or the newest OpenVZ kernel. Since the OpenVZ kernel is falling so far behind (apparently the company pulled the paid developers off of it, slowing things WAY down) I forsee having to depend upon distribution kernels ONLY at some point. Not just yet, but soon.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.