FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Thanks Jeremy, both of you but here Jeremy Hogan. After reading most of the Fedora site, it seems to be a great project. I am going to download it soon and I'm one of those people you mentioned with home built machines
I'm writing Red Hat docs now and will soon start on Fedora.
Originally posted by jhogan
-The retail product was not necessarily our "desktop play" which means two things, one: that pulling this product from retail is not pulling out of the desktop and two: that there will not mean there won't be *any* product in retail from Red Hat. For example: http://www.redhat.com/software/workstation/
I saw that webpage before. Questions for clarification: What is this RH Professional Workstation, exactly? Is it a retail box version of RHEL 3 WS that is sold in stores? Or is it merely based on RHEL 3? What differences, if any, are there between this and RHEL 3?
Originally posted by blaisepascal I saw that webpage before. Questions for clarification: What is this RH Professional Workstation, exactly? Is it a retail box version of RHEL 3 WS that is sold in stores? Or is it merely based on RHEL 3? What differences, if any, are there between this and RHEL 3?
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820
Rep:
I looked at the fedora site and all I can say is, wtf? It sounds like hype. From what I gathered this is Red Hat Linux 10 with a new (geekier) name on it and a commitment from Redhat to have the Linux community do most of the developement.
I know I must be missing something here. Don't misunderstand me please, I love Redhat Linux and am a paying member of the RHN. What is the difference between the Redhat we know and love and the Fedora project?
From what I gathered this is Red Hat Linux 10 with a new (geekier) name on it and a commitment from Redhat to have the Linux community do most of the developement.
Ironically, the community develops a lot of the software [in Red Hat Linux] already. For that software, Red Hat just do the packaging and QA. It would make sense to let the community do the packaging of that software, too. This would free resources at Red Hat. Resources which they could spend on developing the really important core components, their own software and their Enterprise line of products. Of course, it remains to be seen how easy it will be for independent packagers to take over maintenance of a package in Fedora Core. It is likely that in the beginning, contributors will be limited to maintaining packages in Fedora Extras and earning trust and showing competence. While I agree that Fedora Core 1 (assuming it will become version 1) is expected to be just like Red Hat Linux 10, we've seen a couple of changes in development already during the beta period. For instance, the feature freeze has been less strict, IMO, probably as an answer to users' requests. In the past, complaints have been that when released after a long beta testing period, the software in Red Hat Linux would be out-of-date already.
Quote:
I know I must be missing something here. Don't misunderstand me please, I love Redhat Linux and am a paying member of the RHN. What is the difference between the Redhat we know and love and the Fedora project?
Hopefully only good consequences.The web pages mention a couple of differences. It is not my intention to sum up everything here, in particular not the plans on community commitment and open development (it's too early for predictions and the web pages cover Red Hat's control over the project well). Fedora is unsupported by Red Hat (i.e. no web/phone based support). Apparently, a shorter errata support period. The community will need to support old releases of Fedora via Fedora Legacy projects. More frequent releases. Faster development with regard to software version upgrades. Probably -- where possible -- even version upgrades instead of backported security fixes. More ready-to-use software in Fedora compatible packages thanks to the Fedora Extras and Fedora Alternatives projects.
Originally posted by Pcghost I looked at the fedora site and all I can say is, wtf? It sounds like hype. From what I gathered this is Red Hat Linux 10 with a new (geekier) name on it and a commitment from Redhat to have the Linux community do most of the developement.
I know I must be missing something here. Don't misunderstand me please, I love Redhat Linux and am a paying member of the RHN. What is the difference between the Redhat we know and love and the Fedora project?
I've done a lot of thinking about it the last couple of weeks. Fedora seems like a good thing to me. Linux is a community project itself and Fedora will make Red Hat even better. The more people involved the better. This fosters not only a better product - or collection of products - but a sense of community.
Fedora will be the basis for RHEL. So if you know Fedora, it will take just a little study and playing with RHEL to be familiar with it.
Long live open source
I've also noticed that the Fedora docs are GFDL whereas Red Hat's are Open Documentation License. Nice change.
I am looking forward to trying Fedora in November and am wondering how involved I will need to be in the upgrade process. Is the Redhat 9 --> Fedora upgrade straight forward? Will there be a direct upgrade path from RedHat 9 to Fedora?
I only ask because I want to know if I will need to book 30 minutes or 8 hours for the upgrade; the current system is pretty much a generic installation of RH9.
If I had time, I'd try one Fedora prior to upgrading but I don't, so your experience would be helpful.
Thanks,,
J.
I've been running the "test release 2" and it's working out very well. I've also used the apt sources for Red Hat 9 and, so far, there haven't been any obvious issues (knock on wood). I like this new project because it's community oriented. I like being able to help out in any way that I can.
I tried Fedora, and liked it, but I REALLY am mad at RedHat for various reasons (they are a MS wannabe now), and I can list the reasons if you'd like...anyway, I switched to Slack, and am still trying to get a few things working, but overall REALLY lovin it!
Originally posted by dhrivnak I tried Fedora, and liked it, but I REALLY am mad at RedHat for various reasons (they are a MS wannabe now), and I can list the reasons if you'd like...
Originally posted by dhrivnak I tried Fedora, and liked it, but I REALLY am mad at RedHat for various reasons (they are a MS wannabe now), and I can list the reasons if you'd like...
Feodora is the basis for Red Hat's commercial products. so what I'm saying below goes for Fedora goes for Red Hat in general.
Fedora is a free download. Is Windows? Fedora is open source. Is Windows? Fedora has a community of developers from around the world working on the source code which is freely available. Can the same be said for Windows?
You want to add a new feature to the system. You can either.
1. Hire a developer and do what you need (Red Hat and Fedora)
or
2. Pay Microsoft lots of money in license fees and sign a non-disclosure agreement (and still have to hire a developer).
So, please tell, how is Red Hat a Microsoft wannabe?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux or RHEL
Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS= Work Station
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES= what does ES stand for?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS= what does AS stand for?
What the heck have I been downloading and using for the last 1.5 years. Is it just called Red Hat linux 7.2 7.3 8.0 and 9.0? And if I'm understanding things right then fedora is taking the place of Red Hat 10, And red hat is abandoning its Red Hat 10 product. With all of this hate talk here its hard to get a good understanding of whats going on.
If I am understanding things correctly I sure hope the distro that is my favorite doesn't get changed too much. Red Hat is my favorite distro so far, and nothing yet compares to it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.