FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I get some interesting info when I run dmesg, but I don't know what it means:
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M
agpgart: Detected NVIDIA nForce2 chipset
agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe0000000
[fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 428 MBytes.
[fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 3.11.1 [Aug 4 2004] on minor 0
Fire GL built-in AGP-support
Based on agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M
agpgart: Detected nVidia nForce2 chipset
agpgart: Bridge device is in AGP v1/v2 mode
agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe0000000
Power management callback for AGP chipset installed
[fglrx] AGP detected, AgpState = 0x00000000 (hardware caps of chipset)
[fglrx:firegl_unlock] *ERROR* Process 6341 using kernel context 0
But where is the external AGPGart being loaded from, then (if that's the problem)? The kernel?
jonmills' XF86Config-4 clearly says
Quote:
Option "UseInternalAGPGART" "yes"
.
But checking out The ATI Radeon How-to suggests that in fact this setting (UseInternalAGPGART) should be set to "no" for an nForce mobo, and the kernel AGPGART should be used.
Sounds like it's worth a try, anyway. Can't really get much worse than what it is now .
Yes, I did read the ATI HowTo, and what it says is that on an nForce mobo, it's best to use the external agpgart, but that it's only supported on kernel 2.4.22 and later. Red Hat Enterprise Linux uses 2.4.21. So, I can't use the external agpgart. It also says that the internal agp is supported on nForce mobos in ATI driver versions 3.7.6 and later, and I'm using 3.11. Ergo, I must use the internal agp.
Oh for pete's sake, I'm not a freakin newbie. YES, I know 3.11 is after 3.7.6. That's what I said! Did you read my post? I'm using internal agp because it's the only option I have. I can't use external agp because the 2.4.21 kernel doesn't support it on the nForce mobo. As in, it will crash my system. I've tried it.
It seems strange, but it looks like the program you have returned with the ps command is the display manager. I seem to remember a version of RedHat or maybe it was Fedora that I had a problem starting a second X server on with my system.
Can you try this..
Start up the system in runlevel 3, or maybe telinit into runlevel three. Then run startx, or `xinit -e xterm` would be better. Then see how things work. Maybe the display manager is part of the problem. It may be that the problem will only allow you to run X that way.
Last edited by DavidPhillips; 09-07-2004 at 10:33 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.