FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
(WW) AllowEmptyInput is on, devices using drivers 'kbd', 'mouse' or 'vmmouse' will be disabled.
(WW) Disabling Mouse0
(WW) Disabling Keyboard0
...
(WW) RADEONHD(0): rhdAtomAllocateFbScratch: FW FB scratch area 536854528 (size: 16384) extends beyond available framebuffer size 268435456
Quote:
Have you checked to see if there are any updates to the radeon driver in F12? Or perhaps even tried a newer version from rawhide?
There doesn't seem to be anything newer in the repos, and I have a feeling the radeon driver is already somewhat experimental, as it includes 'git' in its version:
#yum list installed *radeon*
You're currently using the 'radeonhd' driver, not the 'radeon' driver. While radeonhd should, theoretically, work, it doesn't see as much development or testing as the radeon driver. If you didn't have an xorg.conf file in your home directory specifying radeonhd, Xorg should, in fact, default to the radeon driver.
Distribution: FreeBSD, Fedora, RHEL, Ubuntu; OS X, Win; have used Slackware, Mandrake, SuSE, Xandros
Posts: 448
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamk75
You're currently using the 'radeonhd' driver, not the 'radeon' driver. While radeonhd should, theoretically, work, it doesn't see as much development or testing as the radeon driver.
Unfortunately, that's because there is no non-hd driver available, according to yum: 'yum list *radeon*' returns the same two packages as 'yum installed *radeon*'. Maybe I'm missing an additional repo?
Quote:
If you didn't have an xorg.conf file in your home directory specifying radeonhd, Xorg should, in fact, default to the radeon driver.
I get the same results if I delete xorg.conf and reboot, which is in fact what I've just done, same exact results.
Does /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so exist? It should, because that's the default driver F12 uses for all radeon GPUs. I don't know what that's packaged as, but it should definitely exist. Try specifying the radeon driver and then pastebin the log file if it doesn't work.
Distribution: FreeBSD, Fedora, RHEL, Ubuntu; OS X, Win; have used Slackware, Mandrake, SuSE, Xandros
Posts: 448
Original Poster
Rep:
adamk75: yes; both radeon_drv.so and radeonhd_drv.so are there. 'sudo X -configure' gave me a fairly sizable conf file to work with, and it did include a "radeonhd" driver entry. I changed this to "radeon" and rebooted, and I can't tell why, but the Xorg logs still show the "radeonhd" module being loaded in addition to "radeon", same results.
Well the radeonhd driver is clearly still on your filesystem. If you actually removed it via yum, then there is something wrong with your fedora installation, which you need to resolve before trying to get compositing working. Unfortunately, I really don't have any idea what 'something' is at the moment.
Now some new errors there: including some looking for a module called 'fgl.renamed.libglx'. Oddly enough, 'FGL.renamed.libglx.so' does exist in modules/extensions; why the 'FGL' is lower-case in the log, I'm not sure, especially, since it's referenced as 'FGL' in xorg.conf.
That's still the old Xorg log file. Also, if you have fgl* files on your system, you apparently still have the remnants of the fglrx driver installed all your system.
Distribution: FreeBSD, Fedora, RHEL, Ubuntu; OS X, Win; have used Slackware, Mandrake, SuSE, Xandros
Posts: 448
Original Poster
Rep:
Sorry ... please refresh the page; I edited my post with the right log file (I think; too much pastebin going on here): http://deesto.pastebin.com/tKazhr60
OK, we're getting closer, but clearly there is still something not quite working here... First, Xorg is using /root/xorg.conf.new. Did you tell it to do that?
Second:
Code:
(II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
(II) Module glx: vendor="FireGL - ATI Technologies Inc."
You still have the FireGL drivers installed, at least partially. They need to be *completely* removed in order for Xorg to work with the open source drivers.
Distribution: FreeBSD, Fedora, RHEL, Ubuntu; OS X, Win; have used Slackware, Mandrake, SuSE, Xandros
Posts: 448
Original Poster
Rep:
Thanks ... let me clear up a few things:
- the fglrx stuff was left behind by the proprietary driver. I did a re-install and un-install to clean up the cruft, which seemed to work.
- that xorg.conf.new was the default name for the file generated by 'X -configure'. I have rebooted and rerun this using the usual file name.
- after all that, still the same %$#^& result: http://deesto.pastebin.com/NS33bWrg
(II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-0 connected
(II) RADEON(0): Output DIN disconnected
(II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-1 connected
(II) RADEON(0): Using spanning desktop for initial modes
(II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-0 using initial mode 1680x1050 +0+0
(II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-1 using initial mode 1680x1050 +1680+0
The odd thing is that the driver clearly sees both monitors connected to DVI ports.
Wait... Are you actually running 'startx' or just 'Xorg' (or 'X')?
Distribution: FreeBSD, Fedora, RHEL, Ubuntu; OS X, Win; have used Slackware, Mandrake, SuSE, Xandros
Posts: 448
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamk75
Wait... Are you actually running 'startx' or just 'Xorg' (or 'X')
I wasn't manually running anything ... just booting into init 5, and then when it hung, I was running 'X' in a separate TTY to test. If I run 'startx' from there, I do get a graphic environment, but barely: just a bare desktop, no menu, no launchers. The only thing new I see in the Xorg log after doing 'startx' is '(II) AIGLX: Suspending AIGLX clients for VT switch".
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.