SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You think that's bad, try building Chromium. I'm doing it now for the first time (using Alien Bob's SlackBuild with one small additional patch) and it looks like it's going to take close to a day on my quad-core Thinkpad. I just hope the patch I made actually results in the desired behavior...
On the other hand, no one is forcing me to build this from source, but I'm glad Slackware (and Alien Bob in this case) makes it so easy to do so. The same applies to Qt5.
Quote:
Originally Posted by montagdude
Alien Bob offers a binary for Chromium, which I had installed previously, but I'm building from source now because I wanted to patch it.
Good luck. You are braver than I. I leave the larger packages for the big dogs. alienBOB must have some beastly build server to create his repos. My strongest system has a i7-4810MQ (3.8GHz turbo) with 16GB of RAM, but it's a laptop. I just don't like the idea of burning up my machine when packages are freely available for download from a trusted source.
I wanted to see if it was possible to permanently disable Incognito mode via source. It is more of an experiment rather than a truly useful change, because Chromium already provides a way to disable it via policy settings in /etc/chromium/policy/managed.
Good post and good points, including quoted. I "grew up" on Linux back in the Gnome 1 days and Gentoo stage 1 days. Used both for some time. After 20 years of work to get my computer to do something for me, I have opted to use a "just works" distro, not because I do not have the capability, but because when I want to use my computer to edit photos, or write, it need it to boot and work without work on my part.
I wanted to see if it was possible to permanently disable Incognito mode via source. It is more of an experiment rather than a truly useful change, because Chromium already provides a way to disable it via policy settings in /etc/chromium/policy/managed.
While, it didn't work, but after a 20 hour build, I don't think it's worth trying again.
I can build for you - takes me about an hour, but will there be any library issues? I've only built for Gentoo and FreeBSD, and for the box its built on.
I can build for you - takes me about an hour, but will there be any library issues? I've only built for Gentoo and FreeBSD, and for the box its built on.
Thanks for the offer, but it's not a big deal. I'm just messing around anyway. It did build successfully, just the patch didn't have the desired effect. I may try one more time.
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by montagdude
Thanks for the offer, but it's not a big deal. I'm just messing around anyway. It did build successfully, just the patch didn't have the desired effect. I may try one more time.
What patch? Maybe if you link to it others can see whats up.
$ uname -a
Linux darkstar 4.18.10 #1 SMP Wed Sep 26 23:19:50 CEST 2018 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4690K CPU @ 3.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Now I'm compiling my own stripped down latest stable kernel (with the current config takes only a minute or so from scratch after mrproper) with no modules (except nvidia), without initrd, with intel microcode compiled in directly:
I have only 211 packages installed:
I've modified init rc scripts further and basically only two or three lines are printed from power on to login: prompt.
All ports are ultra minimal, only the bare minimum is compiled, all the crap is removed, just take a look:
My `ps -auxf` output fits on the single screen (24"), even with X and firefox running (username redacted):
Take a look at the firefox Pkgfile, it's the smallest I've seen to date, while being fully featured (quantum, rust etc):
I don't understand. You've got plenty of computing power, so why would you spend so much effort making your system ultra-minimal? Just for the fun of it? This is the first time I've ever heard of anyone caring about how many lines were in their ps -auxf output.
He's running a Ryzen 7 1700 with 64GB of RAM and a 500GB Samsung EVO 960 NVMe drive with a 4TB WD Red.
Just upgraded Libreoffice to 6.1.2 using his package. Very thankful for Eric's build server!
I am back to running all Slackware. I may sacrifice one unit when OpenBSD 6.4 is released. Or not.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.