LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 08-25-2006, 08:53 PM   #781
vonst
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Wash DC Metro Area
Distribution: Slackware 11
Posts: 108

Rep: Reputation: 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by masinick
Slackware was the VERY FIRST GNU/Linux distro I ever tried, WAY back in 1995. ... On the other hand, that old software absolutely SMOKED on an old Micron P100 - a 100 Mhz Pentium with a 2.1 GB hard drive, a 2X CDrom reader and 16 MB of memory.
Masinick and I have something in common! I started Slacking on a Micron P100 in 1995, too! I SCSI'd mine, tho, at somebody's suggestion. I bumped the memory up to 48 MB, for another $200. The box smoked! It was great! I knew almost nothing about Unix or Linux for that matter except what I could pick up at work on our SunOS 4.1.5 machines.

Slack 11.0rc3. I'm going to go ahead and make an ISO. I'll buy the disk when it comes out. My box needs a stable Slack system on it. It's brand spanking new and I've been holding off sealing the OS on it until 11 came out. I haven't loaded any of my apps back on it yet. It's killing me!!!

--vonSt
 
Old 08-26-2006, 10:03 AM   #782
raska
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Aguascalientes, AGS. Mexico.
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 kernel 2.6.29.6
Posts: 816

Rep: Reputation: 31
Some (neat) comments about Slackware 11.0 RC3
Anyway, it doesn't say something that we all don't know.

Last edited by raska; 08-26-2006 at 10:04 AM.
 
Old 08-26-2006, 02:56 PM   #783
snowtigger
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: england
Distribution: slackware, win2k
Posts: 364

Rep: Reputation: 35
hello all,
I'm not to sure where to ask this.

I decided to have a look at the 2.6.17.11 kernel and it doesn't have reiserfs or ext3 in the kernel, only as a module. What is the chances of getting this changed.

 
Old 08-26-2006, 03:48 PM   #784
Zmyrgel
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS, RHEL, OpenBSD
Posts: 1,006

Rep: Reputation: 37
You could recompile the kernel?
 
Old 08-26-2006, 03:51 PM   #785
Mr Marmmalade
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 214

Rep: Reputation: 27
CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
&
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y

That's what I found in the /kernels/huge26.s/config. I don't know why 2.6.17.11 exists in both /kernels/huge26.s & /extra/linux-2.6.17.11 though. Hopefully Pat'll remove it from /extra, as he's put it in the /kernels directory already. Is there any reason not to, the /extra version doesn't include a config file either.

Plus, I don't think the auto-SMP detection thing is enabled either (the HOTPLUG_CPU option is only available after enabling the SMP option, which Pat hasn't done).

Last edited by Mr Marmmalade; 08-26-2006 at 03:53 PM.
 
Old 08-26-2006, 03:52 PM   #786
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,464

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I thought huge26.s was 2.6.16.x :/.
 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:03 PM   #787
zetabill
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Xubuntu
Posts: 348

Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nylex
I thought huge26.s was 2.6.16.x :/.
As of the last changelog entry he made it 2.6.17.11 as he felt it was very stable. I think it'll all be cleaned up by the time it's officially released.

A thought occurred to me. Most hardcore Slackware users compile their own kernels anyway especially if there is some specific use for the computer. It would be interesting if there were an option to do a custom compile as part of the installation process. It's been a little while since I've done an installation, and I'm not so much a guru to know whether the environment could be used or possibly emulated during the installation so I might just be talking out my rear... but just throwing it out there.
 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:04 PM   #788
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,464

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I missed that line in the changelog, thanks zetabill .
 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:06 PM   #789
KaYoS
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
I remember trying a distro a while back, and there was an option to compile a kernel at install time

Cant remember what it was tho, but it is possible
 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:07 PM   #790
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,464

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Gentoo lets you do that, I'm not sure if there are others though.
 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:11 PM   #791
Zmyrgel
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS, RHEL, OpenBSD
Posts: 1,006

Rep: Reputation: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nylex
Gentoo lets you do that, I'm not sure if there are others though.
I doubt Gentoo 'lets' you compile the kernel
I think it pretty much forces you to compile your own kernel
 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:17 PM   #792
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,464

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well it has genkernel too, they give you a choice you know .
 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:18 PM   #793
Mr Marmmalade
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 214

Rep: Reputation: 27
I wish there was some automagic way to configure the hardware aspects of a kernel rather than DIY as I invariably get something wrong. At least the mobo/cpu aspects, similar to what I think hotplug_cpu is meant to do.

Last edited by Mr Marmmalade; 08-26-2006 at 04:20 PM.
 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:25 PM   #794
snowtigger
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: england
Distribution: slackware, win2k
Posts: 364

Rep: Reputation: 35
Well I have justed had a closer look at the changelog.
And it turns out that huge26.s is a 2.6.17.11 kernel. I should pay attention to what i'm reading really.

It would be nice to have the modules for it in /a instead of /extra

 
Old 08-26-2006, 04:34 PM   #795
Franklin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,348

Rep: Reputation: 217Reputation: 217Reputation: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtigger
hello all,
I'm not to sure where to ask this.

I decided to have a look at the 2.6.17.11 kernel and it doesn't have reiserfs or ext3 in the kernel, only as a module. What is the chances of getting this changed.

None of the 2.6 kernels for slackware have these filesystems compiled into the kernel. This is one reason why you need to create an initrd after installing the kernel, source, and modules from /extra. There's a readme in that directory that explains the procedure. It's pretty much a cut and paste if all you need is reiserfs as he gives this as an example. You will then need to edit lilo.conf accordingly.

And, as someone pointed out, you could just add it on your own by reconfiguring your own kernel.
 
  


Closed Thread

Tags
advice, chat, far, general, upgrade



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slack 10.2 slack 10.2 ran xserver after all on sata with via board devafree LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 5 05-30-2006 11:54 PM
Frozen-Bubble(from slack 8.2) Not Running in slack 9 bongski55 Slackware 8 01-02-2006 04:10 PM
Slack 10.1 will a Slack 10 Wine pkg work? acummings Slackware 1 03-25-2005 04:55 AM
Using Slack 10's 2.6.7 kernel packages on Slack 10.1? SocialEngineer Slackware 1 03-05-2005 11:53 AM
cd rom error on installation media (With both slack 9,1 and slack 10) busbarn Slackware - Installation 6 07-15-2004 03:03 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration