LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2012, 09:29 PM   #91
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097

Philosophy's differ amongst the Linux distributions, but the core value of Linux remains that of being an open alternative kernel.

While Slackware's philosophy is "less is more, minimalism and simplicity are best", Ubuntu's philosophy could be "make it easier for everyone", while Gentoo's philosophy is more like "customize it the way you like it".

The philosophy of the distribution, rather than the core value of the kernel, is what ends up mattering to people, however at the same time you want to keep people happy, stay consistent, and give a quality product rather than a Hodge-podge of half-assed software.

Software like systemd should ONLY be adopted after it has been tested for a long time to prove it can do the work it was intended to do.

Last edited by ReaperX7; 07-13-2012 at 09:31 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-13-2012, 09:31 PM   #92
Mercury305
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Rockville, MD
Distribution: CrunchBang / Ubuntu
Posts: 540

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Philosophy's differ amongst the Linux distributions, but the core value of Linux remains that of being an open alternative kernel.

While Slackware's philosophy is "less is more, minimalism and simplicity are best", Ubuntu's philosophy could be "make it easier for everyone", while Gentoo's philosophy is more like "customize it the way you like it".

The philosophy of the distribution, rather than the core value of the kernel, is what ends up mattering to people, however at the same time you want to keep people happy, stay consistent, and give a quality product rather than a Hodge-podge of half-assed software.
yea as you know I am not a systemd fan. I just did the devils advocate to get more info thats all. Good night my friend and thanks for the driver info on my n2600..

Last edited by Mercury305; 07-14-2012 at 01:51 AM.
 
Old 07-14-2012, 01:48 AM   #93
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,125

Rep: Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200Reputation: 4200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
An example of impending doom: udev sources for recent releases are no longer in existence. They are now part of systemd source tarballs. And udisks? That has been deprecated in favour of the new "udisks2". Read http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/...loss-for-linux and weep.
Ignorant Guru is trying to contribute to the solution: now that udev is upgraded on -current, I can also play with his (still alpha) udevil
 
Old 07-14-2012, 01:56 AM   #94
Gerard Lally
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Leinster, IE
Distribution: Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 2,196

Rep: Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775Reputation: 1775
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Ambition based projects often crumble under the weight of too much change too fast, because few projects are willing to continually rewrite code to support new systems that aren't tried and true.

I just realized that Lennart Poeterring is the same author of PulseAudio, which is probably the worst audio management services ever created for Linux systems.

I still can't believe he was quoted as stating that Debian kFreeBSD was a "toy OS". Seems very hard to take someone seriously when they scoff at projects regardless of size trying to bridge gaps and open new doors.
It's because of his arrogance and contempt that I don't use anything associated with his name. He could develop the greatest operating system on the planet for all I care - I wouldn't use it. Not when he has such contempt for BSD and long-established practices in the UNIX ecosystem. His modus operandi is to determine that the present way of doing things needs to be improved, and of course he is the man to improve it. "That will be easy", he says. But when he starts to "improve" it he finds it's not quite as easy as he predicted, and his creations become increasingly complex. Ironically, they also heap more and more patches on top, which he assured us was not his way of doing things. "It will all be so easy", he said. Meanwhile the whole Linux world is expected to go along with his software while he's still learning. In twenty years' time when he grows up he will be looking for an operating system without all the baggage and he will realise the KISS operating systems he derided twenty years ago had it all along. Eventually we all understand why our parents did it this way. It's just a shame Poettering needs to take the rest of us along on his one-man journey.

Last edited by Gerard Lally; 07-14-2012 at 01:58 AM.
 
7 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-14-2012, 09:48 AM   #95
Mercury305
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Rockville, MD
Distribution: CrunchBang / Ubuntu
Posts: 540

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Lennert

Here is a post I think some of you will like to check out...

https://plus.google.com/115547683951...ts/X3fUhyJREKq
 
Old 07-14-2012, 11:40 AM   #96
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
The original question in this thread has been answered by quite a few LQ members among which those who actually are responsible for making any changes. It simply does not get any more authoritative than that. Any rehashing of statements, comparisons with or rallying against other Linux distributions, any laymans psycho-analysis of persons not being able to defend themselves here anyway may help unite distribution users but does not lend more credibility to a topic that has clearly been exhausted three times over. Closure of this thread was sponsored by the capital S and no, you may not buy a vowel.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
  


Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] slackware and systemd fl0 Slackware 512 08-29-2012 11:07 AM
Boot Delay 30min: systemd-analyze blame systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service BGHolmes Fedora 0 07-27-2011 09:02 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration