LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-11-2021, 04:50 PM   #631
ttk
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 1,038
Blog Entries: 27

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484

Quote:
Originally Posted by derekn13 View Post
I haven't tried Basilisk (yet), but I've been using the gtk3 version of Palemoon. The config file is ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini, and the relevant content is:
Code:
[Settings]
gtk-key-theme-name = Emacs
Hopefully that works for Basilisk, too.
That totally worked for Basilisk! :-) Thank you, derekn13!

Figures that the good people of Slackware LQ can answer such questions when /r/palemoon cannot :-D
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-19-2021, 01:48 PM   #632
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,152

Rep: Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323
Pale Moon v29.3.0 is now available.

The release notes and a download link can be found at, https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-25-2021, 10:03 PM   #633
harryhaller
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Slackware-14.2
Posts: 468

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I am staying on 28.9.1, since that's the last version which supports the essential extensions which I need - being able to pass current page title, url and any selected text to an external script.

I see that firefox now has an extension which nearly does this, so I'll probably be going back there soon, and use the dillo browser to access the gopher and gemini protocols.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-26-2021, 01:14 PM   #634
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,152

Rep: Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryhaller View Post
I am staying on 28.9.1, since that's the last version which supports the essential extensions which I need..........
Ditto, but I have been "test driving" The Basilisk Browser from the same people.
https://www.basilisk-browser.org/releasenotes.shtml
 
Old 07-26-2021, 03:34 PM   #635
zeebra
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,834
Blog Entries: 17

Rep: Reputation: 642Reputation: 642Reputation: 642Reputation: 642Reputation: 642Reputation: 642
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1337_powerslacker View Post
Firefox sucks. I've not wanted to say anything before now, but even I have noticed the slow performance of Firefox, and wondered why recent releases have suffered from code bloat.
You're right actually. I've wanted to create a Firefox rant for quite some time now. I've struggled with Firefox for about a year now, trying to mitigate some of the issues, but it hasn't really worked out all that well. I've started looking at alternative browsers, but there aren't really any good alternatives either. Firefox in a way is quite good, but at the same time awful. The most disturbing thing is that I haven't managed to find any good solutions to the issues, and I've tried quite alot of things!

Mainly issues revolve around security, unpredictable/weird/high memory use and issues of crashes, freezing up etc (tabs and browser) and even crashing the desktop (kwin and/or plasma). I was considering (and maybe still consider) running a virtualbox distro just to run firefox in there, but then I remember how problematic virtualbox is in many ways. So, where am I currently? (not slackware), I'm currently running two versions of firefox from /home/firefox and /opt/*/firefox with something called "systemd-run" from bash with a function to limit memory to 2gb. This does 2 things, it limits Firefox to 2gb "memory high", and it runs /*/firefox/firefox under /usr/lib/systemd/systemd as a user. In addition I've locked down Firefox with Tomoyo Linux MAC, and basically restricted most access.

I've tried all kind of things in Firefox settings as well, in particular the parts about "performance" with processes and hardware acceleration, in addition to several custom settings in about:config, in particular in regards to memory.

At least it no longer crashes/freezes the desktop, might be due to no longer running under sddm/xsession/sh/plasma_session/bash, or it might be to do with Tomoyo. But I'm still struggling with tabs crashing (at about the point firefox takes up around 2gb of memory in total, which is basically very quickly). Looking into Firefox, it still thinks it has access to 8gb of memory, so I think I need to find a way to manipulate it into thinking the system only has 2gb of memory.

Anyways, it's all pretty hopeless, and to me it seems to have something to do with the way Firefox handles memory/caching and all those kind of things, but with no clear solution other than not using Firefox.
Perhaps running the 32-bit version of Firefox could help, but then I have to setup multilib. In that case I might as well run Firefox in a container, which is the solution I think might work best in the end.

I guess for Slackware the equivilent to doing "systemd-run" would be to properly set up cgroups and run firefox in some kind of restricted runner putting it under /usr/bin/xyz-runner /*/*/firefox and managing resources with cgroups. Where the runner would not need to do much except launch firefox as a child and cgroups subgroup firefox under the runner, then restrict resources on the runner "slice" with cgroups.

Last edited by zeebra; 07-26-2021 at 03:37 PM.
 
Old 07-26-2021, 06:30 PM   #636
Skaendo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Location: West Texas, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-14.2
Posts: 1,445

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I ditched Firefox YEARS ago and pretty much ran the gambit on alternative browsers. Palemoon, Basilisk, Waterfox, Slimjet, Brave, Vivaldi. I have to say that Vivaldi, although recently becoming somewhat bloated, is a very good browser. I can make it look really close to Firefox while using the Chrome extensions. But I also keep Basilisk in my personal repo for the lower powered machines I have and use regularly.
 
Old 07-26-2021, 06:47 PM   #637
zeebra
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,834
Blog Entries: 17

Rep: Reputation: 642Reputation: 642Reputation: 642Reputation: 642Reputation: 642Reputation: 642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skaendo View Post
I ditched Firefox YEARS ago and pretty much ran the gambit on alternative browsers. Palemoon, Basilisk, Waterfox, Slimjet, Brave, Vivaldi. I have to say that Vivaldi, although recently becoming somewhat bloated, is a very good browser. I can make it look really close to Firefox while using the Chrome extensions. But I also keep Basilisk in my personal repo for the lower powered machines I have and use regularly.
I was looking into Brave a few months ago. But I don't think any browser have feature parity with Firefox, and most far from.
I use Konqueror sometimes in addition to Firefox. It's alot better now than it was a few years ago. A usable secondary browser I guess. I do however find it a bit sad they will ditch khtml, but it is also understandable. Maintaining a browser is not exactly the core activity of KDE.

I guess something I would "wish for" is a lightweight version of Firefox that is also de-googleized and cleaned of such things. I do have to say I'm slightly worried about the future of Firefox, that perhaps the whole project is bloated and they have taken on too much, is that sustainable in the long run? Especially considering the development of market shares, not that market share necessarily is that meaningful a measure for a non-commercial project.

Last edited by zeebra; 07-26-2021 at 06:53 PM.
 
Old 07-26-2021, 08:24 PM   #638
Skaendo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Location: West Texas, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-14.2
Posts: 1,445

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeebra View Post
I was looking into Brave a few months ago. But I don't think any browser have feature parity with Firefox, and most far from.
I use Konqueror sometimes in addition to Firefox. It's alot better now than it was a few years ago. A usable secondary browser I guess. I do however find it a bit sad they will ditch khtml, but it is also understandable. Maintaining a browser is not exactly the core activity of KDE.

I guess something I would "wish for" is a lightweight version of Firefox that is also de-googleized and cleaned of such things. I do have to say I'm slightly worried about the future of Firefox, that perhaps the whole project is bloated and they have taken on too much, is that sustainable in the long run? Especially considering the development of market shares, not that market share necessarily is that meaningful a measure for a non-commercial project.
Look at Waterfox. I'm not sure if the latest version runs on 14.2, but it should be good on current. It is a Firefox fork with "Limited Data Collection", and "No Telemetry". I'm not 100% but I think that it is also de-googleized.
 
Old 08-25-2021, 10:50 AM   #639
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,152

Rep: Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323
Pale Moon v29.4.0.2 is now available.

The release notes and a download link can be found at, https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-14-2021, 07:00 AM   #640
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,152

Rep: Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323
Pale Moon v29.4.1 has been released.

The release notes and a download link can be found at,
https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-18-2021, 04:29 PM   #641
ttk
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 1,038
Blog Entries: 27

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
The PaleMoon dev team is removing public repo access, for what seems like bullshitty reasons that do not even address the grievance:

https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=27369

Yay more drama. If there were another browser worth using, I wouldn't put up with this.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-18-2021, 04:39 PM   #642
JayByrd
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 302

Rep: Reputation: 310Reputation: 310Reputation: 310Reputation: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttk View Post
The PaleMoon dev team is removing public repo access, for what seems like bullshitty reasons that do not even address the grievance:
https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=27369
Yay more drama. If there were another browser worth using, I wouldn't put up with this.
While I get your point about the "drama" that seems perpetual on the Palemoon forums, in this case, I have to say that Moonchild's reason was far from "bullshitty."

Between github's--i.e., microsoft's--intentionally breaking itself for anyone not using one of the Big4 browsers, and the actions of the Russian trolls flagrantly abusing the Mozilla license (and potentially distributing a tainted malware "version" of palemoon's code,) I don't blame Moonchild one bit for wanting to get out of there.

By the time I had read that post you link to, I had already modified my SlackBuild and was surfing away happily with PM29.4.1.

Last edited by JayByrd; 09-18-2021 at 04:51 PM. Reason: accuracy.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-13-2021, 10:38 AM   #643
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,152

Rep: Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323
Pale Moon v29.4.2.1 has been released.
Quote:
v29.4.2.1 (2021-11-11)
This is a small update to address the folowing issue:
Autocomplete drop-downs would have uncorrect styling, causing issues with custom themes (e.g. unreadable) and not displaying as-intended.
https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-14-2021, 07:10 AM   #644
JayByrd
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 302

Rep: Reputation: 310Reputation: 310Reputation: 310Reputation: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwizardone View Post
Pale Moon v29.4.2.1 has been released.
https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml
Has anyone had success in building this new version on Slackware? After modifying the SlackBuild script slightly to account for changes to the directory structure in the latest versions, and after accounting for some sloppy regex in the mach script (as mentioned here,) the build is still failing--and throwing a rather confusing error. To wit:
Code:
 0:20.12 Creating config.status
 0:20.29 Feeding the hatchlings...
 0:31.01 Finished reading 851 moz.build files in 2.62s
 0:31.01 Processed into 6038 build config descriptors in 3.03s
 0:31.01 RecursiveMake backend executed in 4.48s
 0:31.01   1572 total backend files; 1572 created; 0 updated; 0 unchanged; 0 deleted; 41 -> 654 Makefile
 0:31.02 FasterMake backend executed in 0.31s
 0:31.02   7 total backend files; 7 created; 0 updated; 0 unchanged; 0 deleted
 0:31.02 Total wall time: 10.77s; CPU time: 10.47s; Efficiency: 97%; Untracked: 0.32s
Configure complete!
Be sure to run |mach build| to pick up any changes
 0:31.41 /usr/bin/gmake -f client.mk -s
 0:32.02 gmake: *** No rule to make target 'There', needed by 'Error'.  Stop.
 0:32.03 0 compiler warnings present.
I can't imagine a make target called "There"!!! Any ideas on how to proceed would be greatly appreciated.

(For the record, I'm on Slackware64 14.2.)
 
Old 11-14-2021, 07:33 AM   #645
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,152

Rep: Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323Reputation: 7323
When I use to use Pale Moon I never built it, but used the "package,"
Quote:
Installation:
It is not necessary to install Pale Moon to use it. Pale Moon for Linux is distributed as a xz-compressed tarball

http://linux.palemoon.org/download/mainline/

that can be extracted and run from any location on your system. If however you prefer to "install" it on your system, you can find instructions to do so here.
http://linux.palemoon.org/help/installation/
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what's the best way to import Firefox bookmarks to Pale Moon? newbiesforever Linux - Software 14 01-30-2017 02:08 AM
[SOLVED] Pale Moon vs Firefox storkus Slackware 35 09-07-2015 01:47 PM
LXer: Want Firefox without Australis? Try Pale Moon LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-01-2014 08:51 PM
Pale Moon - A firefox fork coralfang Linux - Software 9 07-16-2014 01:52 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration