SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Either way, other distros don't overwrite existing perms, and I refuse to run a less secure system by running named as root user...
And I didn't say you should. If your argument was that slackware should be configured to use a 'named' user as shipped then I'd be inclined to agree. I simply pointed out that it's the default behaviour of 'tar' rather than "a brain-dead install script" that's causing your issue.
Actually thinking on it a little more, I'm leaning towards the idea that Pat should specify --no-overwrite-dir on tar in the upgradepkg script: it would sort out your issue, but also it would stop broken packages clobbering the permissions of /usr/bin or other system directories, which has been known to happen sometimes.
As I said though: it would mean that any intentional directory/permission changes if future would need to be coded into doinst.sh scripts... but maybe that's not a common enough occurrence for it to be a consideration.
Thanks for this, i think , one of the best "LAST MINUTE" , updates. , becaus its mantained and patched frequently.
Quote:
l/qt5-5.15.3_20210826_21ea9c12-i586-1.txz: Upgraded.
Switched to the patched qt5 from https://invent.kde.org/qt/qt/qt5.git.
Huge thanks to Heinz Wiesinger for the script to create a release tarball.
Likely this fixes many security issues.
(* Security fix *)
Thats the point of """WE CAN TRY""" , in the forum i read problems only in qt5 and obiously kde apps , but thinking in rc1 , is late to try test , and is time to make fixes.
Its funny when some one in same phrase say "i suspicious...but we do not know"
We can skip mariadb 10.6 for now , but not forever , im not interested on this update, im not use mariadb more than the apps linked to this.
The next choose is what happen with linux kernel , 5.13.13 EOL soon for 5.13 , but 5.14 is out , not sure if confused but i read something arround removing IDE DRIVERS , probably this not good ,im not have ide in my machines but probably some servers use it , or old machines.
Last edited by USUARIONUEVO; 08-30-2021 at 09:59 AM.
Thats the point of """WE CAN TRY""" , in the forum i read problems only in qt5 and obiously kde apps , but thinking in rc1 , is late to try test , and is time to make fixes.
Its funny when some one in same phrase say "i suspicious...but we do not know"
We can skip mariadb 10.6 for now , but not forever , im not interested on this update, im not use mariadb more than the apps linked to this.
Well, probably it's, because I doubt that only Qt5 checks the MySQL version compliance.
I believe that there are software which uses MySQL much more than Qt, for example the big portal engines. That's WHY I said that I suspect that NOT every other software is NOT affected.
For example, did you tested Moodle or Chamilo if they works with that MariaDB?
Those are software big like Plasma5, and they are in fact sites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by USUARIONUEVO
The next choose is what happen with linux kernel , 5.13.13 EOL soon for 5.13 , but 5.14 is out , not sure if confused but i read something arround removing IDE DRIVERS , probably this not good ,im not have ide in my machines but probably some servers use it , or old machines.
They removed the legacy IDE drivers, which given you the devices like /dev/hda and so on.
BUT today everybody uses the modern libata drivers for the IDE hard drives, which drivers gives you devices like /dev/sda and so on.
Even the Slackware moved to libata drivers many years ago, on Slacwkare 13.0 if I remember right.
There is nothing to scare you there, unless you still use Slackware 12.2 - but I doubt that the kernel 5.14 could be even built on this particular distro release.
Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 08-30-2021 at 10:22 AM.
After building procps-ng with elogind support libprocps.so links against libelogind.so.0, which prevents a bunch of important system tools (like ps, pidof, pgrep/pkill, and also sysctl) from running. As a consequence, quite a lot of the /etc/rc.d/ scripts fail to work, potentially leaving a lot of processes for the final killall5 to reap. On the other hand, elogind itself is optional for procps-ng - if it is not running, ps just shows fewer fields, and other tools seem to ignore it completely.
elogind package is still marked as "recommended" in the tagfile, and really though most of the Slackers are desktop users - where either elogind or systemd is a strong requirement these days - a headless server wouldn't have much (or, well, any) use for it.
I have checked packages in a/ap/l/n (the "headless" bunch, for lack of a better name) to see other dependencies on libelogind. I have spotted the following:
- dbus (optional but useful) links to libelogind.so.0 directly
- there is an optional PAM module in pam package (required) which doesn't make sense without elogind running
- udisks2 and polkit - mostly GUI staff but elogind support is optional in those
All in all I *think* rather than promoting elogind to a full "required" package it is better to include /lib64/libelogind.so.0 into aaa_libraries instead.
This would make a "minimal" Slackware install to be one package "thinner", and make upgrading from previous versions smoother (e.g., no elogind previously installed -> procps-ng is updated -> ps and pidof don't work -> puzzled sysadmin).
PS Tried reporting this over e-mail but alas this communication channel seems quite dead at the moment.
The new stable release of NTFS-3G and ntfsprogs is available which includes important security fixes. The security advisory is available at https://github.com/tuxera/ntfs-3g/se...q759-8j5v-q5jp The NTFS-3G project globally aims at providing a stable NTFS driver. The project's advanced branch has specifically aimed at developing, maturing, and releasing features for user feedback prior to feature integration into the project's main branch.
They removed the legacy IDE drivers, which given you the devices like /dev/hda and so on.
BUT today everybody uses the modern libata drivers for the IDE hard drives, which drivers gives you devices like /dev/sda and so on.
Even the Slackware moved to libata drivers many years ago, on Slacwkare 13.0 if I remember right.
There is nothing to scare you there, unless you still use Slackware 12.2 - but I doubt that the kernel 5.14 could be even built on this particular distro release.
Heplfull ! Did mean ~10Mb ~30Mb very old MFM IDE era. :-)
Example: Seagate MFM 30 Mb , random search pic from net.
Also say goodby to old chip's, controllers, motherboards.. t. only IDE connector's ?
No, because it have work with libata. So from example Pentium D/Celeron/AMD k8.
Last edited by Roman Dyaba; 08-30-2021 at 06:59 PM.
Reason: add text
suggestion of split package vulkan-icd-loader from vulkan-sdk
by update mesa to 21.2.1, libvulkan.so.1 became a dependence of /usr/lib64/dri/*_dri.so,
this make vulkan-sdk not an optional package anymore, and vulkan-icd-loader became essential.
it's no need install a 130MB package just for a 367kb file.
thanks.
Lately I experienced at times an extremely poor performance when accessing Linuxquestions via Firefox. I also noticed glxtest error messages on the console. Installing libvulkan.so.1 from the vulkan-sdk resolved these problems.
Lately I experienced at times an extremely poor performance when accessing Linuxquestions via Firefox. I also noticed glxtest error messages on the console. Installing libvulkan.so.1 from the vulkan-sdk resolved these problems.
Well, probably is time for us to become habituated with idea that vulkan-sdk is part of the graphics stack and not some "optional" package.
Times change, World changes, Slackware changes too...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.