LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2020, 02:13 AM   #6031
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,987

Rep: Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556

Quote:
Originally Posted by sombragris View Post
Thanks for confirming. It should be noted that the font changes affect only the UI of applications; Firefox, for example, display all fonts in web pages correctly.
In my case the fonts cannot "grow" on me since they are a variant of Courier. Not very ugly in itself but very inadequate for an UI/UX font.
Yes that's what I see too, just the applications fonts. I kind of like the change, sort of...
 
Old 12-01-2020, 02:20 AM   #6032
lonestar_italy
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 175

Rep: Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisretusn View Post
Yes that's what I see too, just the applications fonts. I kind of like the change, sort of...
Nah it's quite ugly. It should be fixed. Reverted to previous version in the while.
 
Old 12-01-2020, 05:08 AM   #6033
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,987

Rep: Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonestar_italy View Post
Nah it's quite ugly. It should be fixed. Reverted to previous version in the while.
Well I guess we will have to disagree on this.
 
Old 12-01-2020, 05:55 AM   #6034
saxa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Nova Gorica, Salvador
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,226

Rep: Reputation: 301Reputation: 301Reputation: 301Reputation: 301
glibmm-2.64.5
https://download.gnome.org/sources/g...-2.64.5.tar.xz
 
Old 12-01-2020, 07:16 AM   #6035
ArTourter
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Frome, UK
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS, Rocky
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonestar_italy View Post
Nah it's quite ugly. It should be fixed. Reverted to previous version in the while.
Actually, I am wondering if it is a kde issue only. I noticed that the font that kde was using in my settings was "Noto Sans [Goog]". However, if I try to set the fonts again, it is called "Noto Sans" without the "[Goog]" bit. Resetting all the kde fonts to "Noto Sans" and restarting the GTK apps fixes the problem for me on two different machines.

I am not sure what prompted the change of names but a lot have changed recently, including fontconfig and GTK3. It could be that GTK3 is quite strict about font names whereas qt5 seems to happily use "Noto Sans" when asking for "Noto Sans [Goog]".
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-01-2020, 08:03 AM   #6036
ziprun
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2018
Posts: 105

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebizz View Post
I realize that Pat bumped XFCE to 4.14 finally, but I still hope however that XFCE 4.16 comes out on time to be included. Right now it is pre2 release.
I'm puzzled why pat would put in 4.14 if he was thinking about upgrading in the end to 4.16. My guess is that he wants to avoid 4.16 because of the controversial CSD that 4.16 is enforcing and avoid another heated debate in the slackware community.
 
Old 12-01-2020, 02:08 PM   #6037
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziprun View Post
I'm puzzled why pat would put in 4.14 if he was thinking about upgrading in the end to 4.16. My guess is that he wants to avoid 4.16 because of the controversial CSD that 4.16 is enforcing and avoid another heated debate in the slackware community.
It could've been getting the prep work done, because the 4.12 to 4.14 jump was a port to a new toolkit (GTK3) and possibly required other under-the-hood changes. 4.16 *might* be a more minor update as far as dependencies and the base system as it is starting to add features once the port to GTK3 was done (I say *might* because I have no idea for sure).
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-01-2020, 09:26 PM   #6038
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,987

Rep: Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArTourter View Post
Actually, I am wondering if it is a kde issue only. I noticed that the font that kde was using in my settings was "Noto Sans [Goog]". However, if I try to set the fonts again, it is called "Noto Sans" without the "[Goog]" bit. Resetting all the kde fonts to "Noto Sans" and restarting the GTK apps fixes the problem for me on two different machines.

I am not sure what prompted the change of names but a lot have changed recently, including fontconfig and GTK3. It could be that GTK3 is quite strict about font names whereas qt5 seems to happily use "Noto Sans" when asking for "Noto Sans [Goog]".
I was playing around with this. I set fonts to the default in System Settings, Fonts, Fonts on reload of GTK apps fonts are back to the way there were before. Or at least not the fonts being use previously. That Noto Sans [Goog] has been there for a while. I noticed it before the fontconfig version upgrade.
 
Old 12-01-2020, 09:40 PM   #6039
sombragris
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Asuncion, Paraguay, South America
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 905

Rep: Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414
Saw that fontconfig was reverted to the latest known working version (2.13.92). Thanks Pat!
 
Old 12-02-2020, 06:50 AM   #6040
LuckyCyborg
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,604

Rep: Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469Reputation: 3469
KDE Plasma 5.20.4 hits the streets.

https://kde.org/announcements/plasma-5.20.4/
https://download.kde.org/stable/plasma/5.20.4/
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-02-2020, 10:13 AM   #6041
ziprun
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2018
Posts: 105

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hey pat. You really should have mwm listed as a window manager in xwmconfig if one has motif installed. I didn't know for the longest time this hidden wm was available until I read about it. This wm is just as usable as twm and should be listed rather than hidden away.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-02-2020, 12:07 PM   #6042
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,480
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 986Reputation: 986Reputation: 986Reputation: 986Reputation: 986Reputation: 986Reputation: 986Reputation: 986
I will take a chance by adding my opinion here regarding the inclusion (or not) of XFCE 4.16:

Since we (as the community) are preparing for the 15.0 release, historically the X.0 releases being "game changers" and "new bringers", I see no good reason for Pat to skim on shipping the latest and greatest, and the 4.16 certainly seems to be past the "troubled waters" and brings even more of the "dreaded GTK-3" to bear?

Only good reason to shy away from 4.16 would be if 15.0 is so close (biting tongue & crossing fingers) that we don't have time to wait out for the 4.16.z release to become stable enough
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-02-2020, 01:08 PM   #6043
gauchao
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Veneto
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 366

Rep: Reputation: 143Reputation: 143
Quote:
x/fontconfig-2.13.92-x86_64-1.txz: Upgraded.
I'm pretty sure there was a good reason to switch to 2.13.92 on the devel
release path, but I'm not sure the same can be said about 2.13.93. We'll
stick with this one for now until there's a stable release or another good
reason to bump it.
Thank your for this! fontconfig-2.13.93 messed up with style default fonts under Fluxbox (fonts under menus have changed from lucida-sans, the default, to something that remembers me of times-news-roman - not sure of it, but menus became ugly). Back to normal.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-02-2020, 02:22 PM   #6044
ziprun
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2018
Posts: 105

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
There is a bug with mwm. With the xwmconfig script for current, 14.2, and others since 2012 it is listed under skel for xwmconfig. But it never shows up for me either in 14.2 or current. This needs to be fixed because mwm is supposed to be showing up in xwmconfig.

Edit: If I could clarify further what I think is wrong pat, motif doesn't have the xinitrc patch for the slackbuild while xfce,windowmaker,fvwm, and fluxbox for example have it. All you need to do pat is just make sure that the xinitrc patch is made for mwm and xwmconfig will find it.

Last edited by ziprun; 12-02-2020 at 06:35 PM.
 
Old 12-03-2020, 05:30 AM   #6045
andrew.46
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,365

Rep: Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493
The latest Gimp can be built against libheif and friends to enable support for avif import and export. I am about to compile it all together myself (most required build scripts are available on SBo) but it would be nice to have support for avif in Gimp 'out of the box'.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Requests for -current (20151216) rworkman Slackware 3441 12-28-2017 03:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration