SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
IMHO, if possible, remove - upowerd, the whole 'blueman/bluetooth' thing (are there really that many people who use it? Not a sarcastic question, just an honest one)
Yes I use bluetooth. I currently have a Dualshock 4 controller that can sync over bluetooth, and I used to use a bluetooth mouse.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
There are a number of Slackware/FVWM users floating around, but according to this LQ poll perhaps not enough to warrant keeping FVWM in the distro, if it poses too much of a maintenance burden on the dev team.
If it disappears, I'd just build my own. The existing source/xap/fvwm/fvwm.SlackBuild could be rehomed to slackbuilds.org, for easy sbopkg'ing.
Agreed that VLC would be a welcome addition.
I offer no opinion on the other programs mentioned, as I've never used them.
There are a number of Slackware/FVWM users floating around, but according to this LQ poll perhaps not enough to warrant keeping FVWM in the distro, if it poses too much of a maintenance burden on the dev team.
To be fair I haven't looked into this in a great deal of detail, but one thing you can say is that FVWM, like a lot of the stuff in XAP, is pretty mature. Changes are few and far between, so I'd assume maintenance is relatively straightforward, compared to, say, a massive project like KDE which is still evolving.
This goes to prove that KDE 3.x was more 'feature complete' in 2005 than KDE 4.x is today.
... which leads me to ask for Trinity Desktop Environment to be included in Slackware... Even if only under /extra on the installation disc.
Not that many users of it and it would put too much maintainance strain on Pat for no real gain. Trinity might have a place in SBo but certainly not in mainline Slackware.
Not that many users of it and it would put too much maintainance strain on Pat for no real gain.
You can't say that with any certainty.
People still use things like FVWM, twm, mwm, FluxBox, BlackBox and WindowMaker... And only a couple of those are desktops which I'd consider to be actually usable in a productive manner in their default configurations. I'll reiterate my comment that KDE3 made a more functional desktop in 2005 than KDE4 does today.
Not sure if you remember much about KDE3 or the build process for it at the time, but it was fairly simple. Compiling Trinity would not be much extra work at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakevr
Trinity might have a place in SBo but certainly not in mainline Slackware.
Well, I did say I'd be happy to see it in the /extra directory... but, yes, I'd even be happy with a SlackBuild for it. If you wanted to further separate it, the packages could install it under /opt/tde and I'd be happy.
People still use things like FVWM, twm, mwm, FluxBox, BlackBox and WindowMaker... And only a couple of those are desktops which I'd consider to be actually usable in a productive manner in their default configurations. I'll reiterate my comment that KDE3 made a more functional desktop in 2005 than KDE4 does today.
Not sure if you remember much about KDE3 or the build process for it at the time, but it was fairly simple. Compiling Trinity would not be much extra work at all.
Well, I did say I'd be happy to see it in the /extra directory... but, yes, I'd even be happy with a SlackBuild for it. If you wanted to further separate it, the packages could install it under /opt/tde and I'd be happy.
I do remember i was a rather avid user of it back in the 3.5.x series. (til; Slack 11? i think)
It would be a burden because not only we might soon have to consider how stuff between Qt4 and Qt5 might need to play out, but also have Qt3 in Tree.
All of the above boxen and WM can be used relatively reasonably in a productive manner even in their default configuration actually.
Plus the upside with the SBo would be easier testing and faster iterations / versions / updates etc without having it tied with mainline Slackware. Don't confuse this with the "no don't put it, me no like, me no wan't oh god muh bloat" types of arguments you see around.
I never thought about how i would like it, just state a few facts (i am most certain it would/could get a place in /extra or /trinity dir anyway which would just mean one more dir to exclude from my slack. end of story for me, but then again i just mirror and make MY isos do not maintain and cater the whole distro for the full target spectrum Slackware currently looks at.)
gtk engines, if only for the clearlooks engine, which looks so nice with my XFCE themes.
I thought about this too, but I find most of the gnome2 parts in Salix directory.
To be specific, I wanted Industrial engine and gtk2 gtksourceview, I had found both of them there.
Otherwise, kdm3 without qt3, hal, or kde deps, that builds on qt4/qt5 and works with consolekit2
Not sure if possible though, may be a lot of work.
~$ ls -lh /root/packages/ffmpeg-2.8.git-i686-1_local.txz
-rw-r--r-- 1 build build 13M Nov 28 14:48 /root/packages/ffmpeg-2.8.git-i686-1_local.txz
13M isn't that big.
Problem with including ffmpeg is that Pat would need to leave many of the commonly wanted codecs disabled to avoid legal/patent issues. Most folks would end up having to rebuild it using different config options anyway, so I'm not sure how much value a minimally configured ffmpeg would add, and it could even make life more difficult for those of us that add it to our systems should other parts of slackware start linking with it's libraries as a matter of course.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.