LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-26-2012, 07:12 PM   #166
elvis4526
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Terminus should really be included. It's non-intrusive, and like any other font, it can be deleted for others that don't want to use it. But c'mon, who doesn't use it?
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 09-03-2012, 09:35 PM   #167
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
md5deep. It's a really simple recursive md5 program. It's available from SBo and doesn't seem to have any dependencies.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-06-2012, 06:29 AM   #168
Alvin Chey
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Singapore
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0 Stable (64-bit)
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 12
mcchanger feature is also found in Cisco routers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury305 View Post
mcchanger changes your mac address it does not necessarily mean you are hacking with it.
In Cisco routers, you are able to over-ride the default mac address of the interfaces. (see https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/2869)

(I have used Cisco Router 881)
 
Old 09-06-2012, 01:12 PM   #169
foodown
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 611

Rep: Reputation: 221Reputation: 221Reputation: 221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Chey View Post
In Cisco routers, you are able to over-ride the default mac address of the interfaces. (see https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/2869)

(I have used Cisco Router 881)
Also true of every version of Windows since at least NT 3.5.

... and every Linux distro with ifconfig ...

(ifconfig ethX hw ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx)
(assuming the card will do it)
 
Old 02-20-2013, 05:55 AM   #170
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,915

Rep: Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033Reputation: 5033
Quote:
ap/terminus-font-4.38-noarch-1.txz: Added.
WOOT! Thank you Pat!

 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2013, 11:44 AM   #171
mina86
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 517

Rep: Reputation: 229Reputation: 229Reputation: 229
rxvt-unicode, sawfish, mpd+mpc, maybe bitlbee. That would save me some compiling, but not a big deal.
 
Old 02-20-2013, 02:48 PM   #172
Beelzebud
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: Arch & Slackware
Posts: 96

Rep: Reputation: 29
I'd like to see grub2 offered along with lilo. I'd also like to see KDE split in to a core package, and smaller extra packages with the rest of the software.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2013, 04:39 PM   #173
tallship
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: On the Beaches of Super Sunny Southern San Clemente, California USA
Distribution: Slackware - duh!
Posts: 534
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 118Reputation: 118
Arrow It's already included in base

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnguyen View Post
I would like to have NetworkManager (wicd is good, but it lacks mobile broadband support which many users need nowadays).
FYI, Network Manager was added to -current prior to the release of Slackware 14

I hope that helps!

Kindest regards,

.
 
Old 02-20-2013, 06:33 PM   #174
deadbeat
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Distribution: Slamd64
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Syslinux as bootloader replacing lilo, no need for grub.

Most of all PAM and systemd though. I think its about time.
 
Old 02-20-2013, 08:43 PM   #175
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 2,533

Rep: Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadbeat View Post
Most of all PAM and systemd though. I think its about time.
Don't hold your breath.
 
9 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2013, 10:33 PM   #176
deadbeat
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Distribution: Slamd64
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
Don't hold your breath.
I appreciate the reply. For PAM the reasons are pretty much known, but what is the problem with systemd? You can't even compare it to the mess sysvinit is. Systemd is well thought, robust and solves actual problems.
Yes it doesn't work on anything but Linux, but last i checked Slackware didn't either.
Have you (not just Pat but Slackware people in general) tried recent versions of it?

Last edited by deadbeat; 02-20-2013 at 10:34 PM.
 
Old 02-20-2013, 10:48 PM   #177
allend
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 6,377

Rep: Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757Reputation: 2757
/me holds nose and points to suitable thread for this stale and smelly troll bait http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ystemd-885228/
 
Old 02-20-2013, 11:32 PM   #178
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 2,533

Rep: Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadbeat View Post
...what is the problem with systemd? You can't even compare it to the mess sysvinit is.
Funny, my take is the exact opposite of yours.

Quote:
Systemd is well thought, robust and solves actual problems.
Like what? Try a search for "systemd crashing" and tell me again about how robust it is. I've been using Linux almost forever, and init has never crashed.

Quote:
Yes it doesn't work on anything but Linux, but last i checked Slackware didn't either.
That's an odd argument. As far as I know, adding systemd wouldn't help Slackware work on a non-Linux OS.

Anyway, we use plenty of things that are closely tied to the kernel and don't work on non-Linux operating systems, so that is not the rationale here. It's more like, if we're going to be dropping core functionality with years of careful evolution, it had better be a clear improvement. It doesn't take very much time on Google to see that not everyone is happy with systemd. And I'd guess that the usual Slackware user would be even less happy with it than the usual user of (insert other distro here). The benchmarks I've seen don't show an improvement in boot time (the opposite, actually), and users and developers alike have complained that it lacks the flexibility of shell scripts, that it is harder to create a systemd unit than to modify a shell script, and that it can easily lead to race conditions as processes start. It is far from simple, and it tries to do too much. It actually has to create sockets for services that haven't started yet in order to paper over the issues with things that haven't started up yet. And sysvinit as implemented in Slackware is a mess? Spare me.

Quote:
Have you (not just Pat but Slackware people in general) tried recent versions of it?
I have. Didn't care for it, and wouldn't want to have to support it. If you like it, there are a whole lot of distributions that use it, and I realize that we can't be everything to everybody. As long it is remains optional, I plan to avoid it. Unfortunately, the folks in charge of it seem to force it upon us, and everyone else. A healthy open source ecosystem respects diversity, and doesn't try to railroad everyone into being exactly the same. Without choices, you cannot choose a solution that fits your needs. That's not what we want, is it?
 
22 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-21-2013, 12:16 AM   #179
deadbeat
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Distribution: Slamd64
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
Try a search for "systemd crashing" and tell me again about how robust it is.
Thanks again for taking the time to reply Pat.
I couldn't get many results, but i agree sysvinit is more reliable



Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
And sysvinit as implemented in Slackware is a mess? Spare me.
I can think of some that could use improvements offhand.
The bluetooth one that doesn't even show up on the installer and is -x by default.
Then there is the wireless/networking situation. Slackware still ships rc scripts that afaict are completely useless today.
Not to mention that due to some coming from upstream etc as well as being written by different people don't carry a consistent coding style.
At least using systemd would mean *actual* 0 maintenance for init scripts by downstream and consistency in them.
 
Old 02-21-2013, 12:34 AM   #180
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 2,533

Rep: Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515Reputation: 8515
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadbeat View Post
I can think of some that could use improvements offhand.
The bluetooth one that doesn't even show up on the installer and is -x by default.
On my fresh install, rc.bluetooth is not -x.

Quote:
Then there is the wireless/networking situation. Slackware still ships rc scripts that afaict are completely useless today.
It is still possible to use them. Some people do.

Quote:
Not to mention that due to some coming from upstream etc as well as being written by different people don't carry a consistent coding style. At least using systemd would mean *actual* 0 maintenance for init scripts by downstream and consistency in them.
My friend, few things from upstream are so golden as to require zero maintenance. I'm guessing you haven't read as many SRPM changelogs as I have... getting a systemd unit right is far from a trivial task.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
slackbuild textlive on slackware 13 missing texmf tree balamkej Slackware 4 01-21-2010 03:19 PM
A script that could mirror slackware tree from multiple servers grissiom Slackware 8 11-21-2009 07:05 PM
suggestions on family tree programs and..... Chris106 Linux - General 2 10-22-2008 07:54 AM
Linux Family Tree -- Where Slackware Fits unixfool Slackware 16 04-23-2008 11:47 PM
Slackware 9.1 tree/slapt-get question 187807 Slackware 3 02-20-2004 06:36 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration