LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2015, 04:16 AM   #1
_ZeD_
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 1
Question missing gst-plugins-bad and -ugly


Just to know, is there a reason why the gst-plugins-bad and gst-plugins-ugly packages are missing in the default installation?
(I'm specifically searching for the version 1.6.x, not the 0.10.x)
 
Old 12-07-2015, 04:33 AM   #2
a4z
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,727

Rep: Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742
the gst-plugins-bad/ugly says:

Quote:
This module contains a set of plugins that have good quality and correct functionality, but distributing them might pose problems. The license on either the plugins or the supporting libraries might not be how we'd like. The code might be widely known to present patent problems. Distributors should check if they want/can ship these plugins.
 
Old 12-07-2015, 04:54 AM   #3
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
...and for that reason, they will not be added to the distribution.
You can get the SlackBuild script and create these packages yourself, or download pre-built packages from 3rd party repositories (if you can find them).

Also, the gstreamer 1.x versions are only incorporated into slackware-current at the moment, so SlackBuilds.org will not have proper support yet (SBo supports stable Slackware releases only).
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:55 AM   #4
_ZeD_
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1
You should know more than me, but I though the plugins with legal issues were the -ugly ones, where the -bad ones should have only "technological" issues.

BTW, I found some old version (1.4.5) of the gstreamer slackbuilds on http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14...es/gstreamer1/
 
Old 12-08-2015, 08:56 AM   #5
xflow7
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 215

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ZeD_ View Post
You should know more than me, but I though the plugins with legal issues were the -ugly ones, where the -bad ones should have only "technological" issues.
In fairness, known technological issues are just as valid a reason *not* to include a package as license/patent issues. Particularly so given Slackware's mission as a stable/robust distribution.

Dave
 
  


Reply

Tags
gstreamer



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] slackware 14.0 gst-plugins-bad opus error dumdadum Slackware 20 11-19-2013 04:59 PM
How to build gst-plugins-bad with musicbrainz support? imitis Slackware 1 10-19-2011 01:22 PM
gst-plugins-(good and ugly) not building, but bad does samac Slackware 5 09-06-2009 12:58 PM
gst-plugins-bad error regarding x264 agrestic Slackware 6 02-24-2009 11:54 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration