LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2018, 07:03 AM   #196
FlinchX
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2017
Distribution: Slackware Linux
Posts: 666

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Quote:
Originally Posted by franzen View Post
On my 64bit host without multilib, i run a 32bit lxc container to be able to run wine to use a tax app only available as closedsource 32bit, it works fine. No experience with gaming/steam-client.
Do you have this documented anywhere as a lazy user-friendly HOWTO?
 
Old 07-07-2018, 08:08 AM   #197
orbea
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,950

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
BUT, I will love to stop calling people trolls. I know that's the new trend around is to yell troll to anyone who disagree with you, but from you I have some expectations. As Culture.
By all means, incessantly ranting about off-topic nonsense which only serves to mislead the uninformed and derail this thread while annoying people who explicitly do not like you nor do they appreciate your input is trolling. Its also really scummy, but I suppose this is the only type of human interaction you know how to achieve...

Everyone else, please stop feeding the troll. Thanks!
 
Old 07-07-2018, 09:36 AM   #198
jakedp
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware64, Mageia
Posts: 226

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by a4z View Post
I said this is my main usecase, read it up, and that I do not care so much about the other use cases, but that there are many reasons why multilib compiler should be default in Slackware. Fits of course not to your trolling, you troll. Now deliver what you are talking about or shut up, because everyone knows now what a big moth and troll you are

Quit please. It has been shown repeatedly that one can compile 32-bit on Slackware64 by default and it has been shown repeatedly.

Last edited by jakedp; 07-07-2018 at 10:06 AM. Reason: fixed typo
 
Old 07-07-2018, 09:40 AM   #199
jakedp
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware64, Mageia
Posts: 226

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
OK, people, so the incredible and impossible Slackware 32bit operating system with a 64bit kernel, had been incarnated in the form of a VirtualBox virtual machine. Screenshot attached.

It is just a standard full install of Slackware 32-bit excluding KDEI series and usual configuration.

After finishing installation, I replaced the non-smp kernels with the ones from Slackware64, then configured the LILO and reboot.

Sure, there is no possible to build kernel modules, because the lack of a proper x86_64 compiler, as I said in a previous post.

Must be invented some cross-compiling, or maybe used a multi-architecture GCC, with the note that of course GLIBC is no need to be touched. That's why I said that I tested that, it is possible, I had intention to propose that from long time, but I had no time yet to find a minimal invasive solution for building X86_64 kernels and modules from this 32bit operating system.

Long story short, if someone wants to download this virtual machine, just to ask in private, I will export it and in several hours I will send them a link from where can be downloaded. In several hours, because I have something to do meantime.

And again, sorry! But I have no public server at disposition for publicly share it.

BUT, leaving out all [removed] and all that MULTILIB AKBARU! it is trivial to run a full-install 32bit operating system with a 64bit kernel, when we talk about Slackware. IF you already have them and you do not need to build modules, ie. from Slackware64, yet to make a cross-compiler to x86_64 is not so complicated.

Another visible issue is that anything using the UNAME feature believes that's in a 64bit operating system, just like in Slackware64 and Multi-Lib, but that could be fixed using simply /usr/bin/linux32

Something like that started to use Fedora around 10 years ago. It is nothing new.

This is a good service that has enough space for a disk image if you configured the VirtualBox disk as dynamic.


https://mega.nz/
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2018, 09:54 AM   #200
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,607

Rep: Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106Reputation: 4106
a4z, I was very clear in post #176. Your posting privileges have been revoked for 24 hours. Please reconsider your posting habits during that time. If you have any questions, do feel free to contact me. Thanks.

--jeremy
 
6 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2018, 10:16 AM   #201
jakedp
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware64, Mageia
Posts: 226

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by a4z View Post
well, if you ignore what was give to you only god can help you, (what is what your signature says) ... you are definitely not just total incompetent but also a troll.
actually admins should stop you from polluting threads like you do, I will not longer fix the shit you write since ... PLONK!

Actually my signature does not say that.. *facepalm*
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2018, 10:17 AM   #202
orbea
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,950

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakedp View Post
Quit please. It has been shown repeatedly that one can compile 32-bit on Slackware64 by default and it has been shown repeatedly.
It has been shown you can cross-compile for 32-bit on Slackware64. It has not been shown you can build 32-bit programs for Slackware64 without multilib. Can you please stop spreading misinformation and derailing the thread?

Last edited by orbea; 07-07-2018 at 10:19 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2018, 10:45 AM   #203
jakedp
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware64, Mageia
Posts: 226

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by orbea View Post
It has been shown you can cross-compile for 32-bit on Slackware64. It has not been shown you can build 32-bit programs for Slackware64 without multilib. Can you please stop spreading misinformation and derailing the thread?

Prove you cannot do it.



A quick search provides:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...9/#post5688545


What was shown is you can create multilibs in a 32-bit chroot with a default full install of Slackware64. No external downloads or tools. Only one thing to check is if the Slackware SlackBuild is different for glibc than Slackware64



Here is one line so the linker does not get confused:


Code:
env CFLAGS=”-m32″ LDFLAGS=”-m32″ ./configure –build=i686-unknown-linux-gnu

I do not believe it cannot be done and one HAS to use a chroot to build multilib. If one can build multilib on Slackware64 then my assertion is true. How do you think it was done 17 years ago when it was new? It is very likely a case of a lack of knowledge and masochism to do otherwise. A project for later...

Last edited by jakedp; 07-07-2018 at 10:49 AM.
 
Old 07-07-2018, 11:09 AM   #204
jakedp
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware64, Mageia
Posts: 226

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
Sorry for the spam. A further quick search and a few minutes of thinking and I have something for anyone interested in going through the process. When Slackware 15 is out and I install it on the main machine (currently running Ubuntu Mate :-( ) I shall prove it can be done.

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2010-09/msg00040.html

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...issue#18263200

I never said it would be easy or the best way of doing it but only that it could be done. Comparison of Slackware and Slackware64 src for build configuration would be needed of course.
 
Old 07-07-2018, 06:12 PM   #205
stoffepojken
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
a4z, I was very clear in post #176. Your posting privileges have been revoked for 24 hours. Please reconsider your posting habits during that time. If you have any questions, do feel free to contact me. Thanks.

--jeremy
How come that Darth Vader in every thread is allowed to go off topic and go on with his FUD about plasma 5?
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2018, 08:00 PM   #206
ZhaoLin1457
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,051

Rep: Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266
Permit me to confirm that Slackware 32bit works fine with 64bit kernels from Slackware64, tested in a real machine by replacing the non-smp kernels, just like was described.

And apparently with these 64bit kernels the system feels much faster and responsive, also the test program proposed by OP obtain a better score (if I understand right and a smaller number is better)
Code:
32bit test program, 32bit OS, 32bit kernel: 25751
32bit test program, 32bit OS, 64bit kernel: 10514
Then I think an optional 64bit kernel for Slackware 32bit is a interesting suggestion for improvements.

To be honest, I would like to know more about the possible advantages of using 64bit kernels with a 32bit operating system, and I think that's legit and on-topic if we discuss for real about "the future of 32bit in Slackware", and this thread is not exclusively a campaign for "multilib should be included in Slackware!"

And yes, a cross-compilation toolchain does not scare me, because I used a cross-compiler many times in the past, to compile Android for ARM architecture, from a x86 Fedora box.

About how some people use or abuse terms like "off-topic", "troll" and "FUD", I remember that recently I was myself called troll and blamed to spread FUD in another thread, because I stated that from what I read some KDE-only dependencies maybe will be distributed in l/ series and not in kde/, then several posts later someone else to accept that there are packages like that in l/ even today, and they has no further usefullness if you do not install KDE, but they never was a issue until a certain user questioned that.

Last edited by ZhaoLin1457; 07-07-2018 at 08:03 PM.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-08-2018, 03:15 AM   #207
stoffepojken
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZhaoLin1457 View Post
Permit me to confirm that Slackware 32bit works fine with 64bit kernels from Slackware64, tested in a real machine by replacing the non-smp kernels, just like was described.

And apparently with these 64bit kernels the system feels much faster and responsive, also the test program proposed by OP obtain a better score (if I understand right and a smaller number is better)
Code:
32bit test program, 32bit OS, 32bit kernel: 25751
32bit test program, 32bit OS, 64bit kernel: 10514
Then I think an optional 64bit kernel for Slackware 32bit is a interesting suggestion for improvements.

To be honest, I would like to know more about the possible advantages of using 64bit kernels with a 32bit operating system, and I think that's legit and on-topic if we discuss for real about "the future of 32bit in Slackware", and this thread is not exclusively a campaign for "multilib should be included in Slackware!"

And yes, a cross-compilation toolchain does not scare me, because I used a cross-compiler many times in the past, to compile Android for ARM architecture, from a x86 Fedora box.

About how some people use or abuse terms like "off-topic", "troll" and "FUD", I remember that recently I was myself called troll and blamed to spread FUD in another thread, because I stated that from what I read some KDE-only dependencies maybe will be distributed in l/ series and not in kde/, then several posts later someone else to accept that there are packages like that in l/ even today, and they has no further usefullness if you do not install KDE, but they never was a issue until a certain user questioned that.
You constantly repeat what ever Darth Vader says.
 
Old 07-08-2018, 03:45 AM   #208
solarfields
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: slackalaxy.com
Distribution: Slackware, CRUX
Posts: 1,456

Rep: Reputation: 1007Reputation: 1007Reputation: 1007Reputation: 1007Reputation: 1007Reputation: 1007Reputation: 1007Reputation: 1007
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoffepojken View Post
How come that Darth Vader in every thread is allowed to go off topic and go on with his FUD about plasma 5?
The same reason his nationality has been brought up as an argument against him. Free speech.
 
Old 07-08-2018, 04:13 AM   #209
stoffepojken
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by solarfields View Post
The same reason his nationality has been brought up as an argument against him. Free speech.
[removed]
 
Old 07-08-2018, 07:27 AM   #210
ZhaoLin1457
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,051

Rep: Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoffepojken View Post
Romanians are nazis. What they do to the gipsys are apartheid.
So, you are against Darth Vader just because he's Romanian and all Romanians are nazis in your opinion?

At least from what I watched and read from media, the travellers from Romania are so rich that they dared even Royal style weedings which blocked the traffic in a city of dimensions like Stockholm. With Ferraris and Lamborghinis. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ebrations.html

And they had a traveller as President in the near past: Ion Iliescu. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_Iliescu

Also, their current President Klaus Iohannis is of German nationality. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Iohannis

That's apparently exactly contrary to what you claim.

Anyways, I may be mistaken, but I think your political agenda has nothing to do with this forum.

Oh, apparently the proper term in English is "travellers" and the word "gipsy" is a pejorative like "ni**a" for Afro-Americans.

Last edited by ZhaoLin1457; 07-08-2018 at 08:45 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ubuntu 32-bit Future? wagscat123 Ubuntu 3 11-03-2016 10:18 AM
LXer: GNU/Hurd Plans For A Future With USB, SATA, 64-Bit LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-10-2013 04:01 AM
How important is 64-bit support in future Slackware? wheeliee Slackware 36 03-25-2009 05:34 AM
LXer: Desktop FreeBSD: 64-bit Future LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 10-06-2006 11:14 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration