SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If it matters or not - you don't decide it. You already expressed your view on the topic, and you don't need to repeat it again and again. So mind your business and don't behave like a clown.
You've repeated your information several times and posted this on a public forum. That means anyone can post and they can ignore the "mind your own business". I won't talk about your behavior.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ialexand
Too many words...
Ok, too many words for you. Sorry, I'll simplify.
Plasma5 in testing/ for 34 days (including several major updates from upstream).
PAM in testing/ for 95 days.
PAM has taken more time to prepare for Slackware.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ialexand
You probably forgot many years of Allien's efforts before Plasma went to -current and still problematic.
Want to dive into that? You're missing info with that. vbatts work on PAM started in 2012 and Alien Bob's work on Plasma5 started in 2014.
Plasma5: Alien Bob's first release - 13 AUG 2014
PAM: vbatts earliest found release - 17 FEB 2012
Based on you being uninformed, you might not be aware that vbatts is also a core dev team member of Slackware. http://www.slackware.com/~vbatts/
I still think PAM caused the biggest delay for 15.0.
Throwing GNOME away wasn't a dealbreaker though. The situation with KDE will be worse and worse in the future.
Ahm.. actually I remember for a few folks it was a deal breaker. I left Slackware for a short while because of that. I came back because the was nothing else out there worth considering. I overcame and adapted to live without GNOME2 just as I have grown to appreciate KDE Plamsma 5. In the highly unlikely event that KDE was dumped from Slackware, I would overcome and adapt. For me it not all about the desktop environment, it is Slackware as a whole the keeps me going as a Slackware user. There is really is nothing else out their worth considering.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ialexand
Don't you see that you are killing Slackware with this biger than GNOME giant and ugly garbage?
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. In my eyes, KDE out shines GNOME3.
So what would you replace KDE with? I suspect I know that answer, though I could be wrong.
I like Slackware just the way it is and I don't use any of the installed environments, large or small. I don't even install them. If PV decides to change it, it won't bother me in the least.
As far as I am concerned KDE/Plasma works quite nicely.
And I find KDE applications (Konsole, Kate, Gwenview, etc.) superior to their equivalents from other DEs. Even if I'm not using KDE/Plasma (as, for example, when I used my preferred GUI, Fluxbox), I use the KDE/Plasma applications under Fluxbox.
Also, I loathe Gnome with the fire of a thousand suns.
(big sigh) Honestly, who cares? Personally I only use XFCE, but that is _my_ prerogative. If Slackware came with 101-dalmations-desktops, I would still use Slackware and XFCE. Ok - so it takes a bit more gigs on my disk - I don't care. The advantages of Slackware go wayyyy beyond whatever desktop you choose.
Just my 2c-worth.
Not likely. KDE is regularly voted DE of the Year here at LQ, and is the only serious contender for a consistent, powerful, attractive Linux desktop experience. And I say this is someone who doesn't use it, or even install it when I install Slackware.
As far as I am concerned KDE/Plasma works quite nicely.
Agreed. KDE-plasma on Slackware is a very welcome addition, it's leaner, faster than KDE4. Also, along with the addition of the newer XFCE we have a winner when 15.0 is released.
I like Slackware just the way it is and I don't use any of the installed environments, large or small. I don't even install them. If PV decides to change it, it won't bother me in the least.
I find that Cinnamon takes the most ram as I always take that into account when using a DE, and playing in --Current I have also messed with MATE as well as Plasma(KDE) , and surprisingly KDE has the least amount of RAM usage.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.