LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2020, 10:40 AM   #16
TheTKS
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, X/ubuntu, OpenBSD, OpenWRT
Posts: 361

Rep: Reputation: 243Reputation: 243Reputation: 243

I'm going to stray from the question slightly in anticipation of installing a 32 bit OS this year.

We have a family general-use Chromebook, 32 bit ARM. Slackware looks like a good candidate to displace ChromeOS, if I can figure out how to load ARM 32 bit.

Why? Its ChromeOS won't receive updates after June. Not just no feature updates - no security updates either. I only bought it 3-1/2 years ago and it's still in good physical shape, it bothers me to throw away things that are still useful, but I don't want an OS that won't get security updates.

I guess it was already an "old" model when I bought it. That is, old in Chromebook years - I since found it that it's normal for Google to stop supporting Chromebooks 6-1/2 years after launch. No more Chromebooks for this family.

TKS
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-24-2020, 11:47 AM   #17
enorbet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Slackware = Main OpSys
Posts: 4,797

Rep: Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436Reputation: 4436
I still have a dedicated install of 14.1 32 bit on it's own partition, and though I rarely boot it anymore, I do miss it's simplicity. I find Multilib a PITA and find myself grousing that I don't recall such jumping through hoops to go from 8 to 16, or 16 to 32. It doesn't help that 64bit is still not appreciably higher performance than 32bit for most operations. I know it makes for better performance to not have to deal with that whole layer of accommodation/translation, but transitions are just painful. I'll be really glad when everything is 64bit and 128bit is still decades in the future.
 
Old 02-24-2020, 11:48 AM   #18
bazio101
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2020
Location: Greece
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
Are You Running Slackware 32-bit?

I guess that in an Intel Celeron 2.40 GHz, 2 GB ram and 20 GB HDD hard disk, home PC, choices are limited.
Slackware 14.2, 32bit (without kde and kdei packages) with WindowMaker works great as a home server (nextcloud and prosody xmpp).
Works even greater for learning purposes (fighting with drupal 8 right now).
If you ask me, there is no useless computer machine, 'till you try linux on it (preferably Slackware).
 
Old 02-24-2020, 11:59 AM   #19
EdGr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Location: California, USA
Distribution: I run my own OS
Posts: 1,000

Rep: Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472Reputation: 472
My oldest PC is 32-bits. It has been relegated to the closet. I keep it as a spare. I figure there is no urgency in getting rid of a laptop (unlike the old desktop PCs with CRT monitors that took up too much space).

All of my PCs in current use are 64-bits.
Ed
 
Old 02-24-2020, 01:02 PM   #20
gegechris99
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware 15.0 64bit
Posts: 1,162
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 394Reputation: 394Reputation: 394Reputation: 394
I'm running Slackware Current 32-bits on a old desktop PC (circa 2004). It's only console mode (no Xorg). It's a sandbox where I can test server services (NFS, FTP server). For example, I'm currently using it as a backup server (rsync over ssh).
 
Old 02-24-2020, 01:33 PM   #21
jr_bob_dobbs
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Distribution: Bedrock, Devuan, Slackware, Linux From Scratch, Void
Posts: 651
Blog Entries: 135

Rep: Reputation: 188Reputation: 188
Er, sort of? It's a Slackware 64 system but I then used AlienBob's tools to get multilib by putting in bits from Slackware 32. Had to do this for Wine, for gaming and to run some older programs.
 
Old 02-24-2020, 01:44 PM   #22
ehartman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Delft, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,674

Rep: Reputation: 888Reputation: 888Reputation: 888Reputation: 888Reputation: 888Reputation: 888Reputation: 888
Quote:
Originally Posted by upnort View Post
I'm curious to hear from people running 32-bit rather than 64-bit and why.
I've got a more then 10 years old HP Core 2 Duo machine with 4GB of RAM.
So applications won't have more then 4 GB available anyway and everything I want can be done within that amount (with the 32-bit PAE kernel).
So I never saw the need to update this machine from 32-bit Slackware.

PS: the machine originally had been installed with 12.2 as that's what I was using on my inherited AMD machine. It has been updated now to a stable 14 version, but - as I said - still the 32-bit version. I _do_ have a lot of 32-bit applications left from older times.
For instance I'm still using acroread, which doesn't come in 64-bit versions (and is closed source, so you cannot recompile it either).
So when I would change TO 64 I still would need multi-lib support to support those applications. It just isn't worth my time to do so.

PS2: my still older PIII of course is running Slackware 32-bit too.
 
Old 02-24-2020, 02:47 PM   #23
justwantin
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Distribution: Slackware, Slackwarearm
Posts: 878

Rep: Reputation: 120Reputation: 120
Just installed current on an Acer Aspire One, manufactured 2009. Its handy as a backup if big box is down, I also take it out to the shop sometimes and its handy for checking mail and news on a trip.
 
Old 02-24-2020, 03:22 PM   #24
bormant
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 426

Rep: Reputation: 240Reputation: 240Reputation: 240
14.2 on Intel Atom N270 netbook.
 
Old 02-24-2020, 03:46 PM   #25
abga
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2017
Location: EU
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,634

Rep: Reputation: 929Reputation: 929Reputation: 929Reputation: 929Reputation: 929Reputation: 929Reputation: 929Reputation: 929
Same here, running Slackware 14.2 on an Intel Atom N270 netbook that doesn't want to die. Additionally, I'm running Slackware -current ARM on a bunch of Raspberry Pi2B boards.
 
Old 02-24-2020, 04:27 PM   #26
baumei
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2019
Location: USA; North Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 15.0 (replacing 14.2)
Posts: 365

Rep: Reputation: 124Reputation: 124
I use 32-bit Slackware 14.2 on my primary computer, because it has a 32-bit single core processor (ASUS EeePC 1005HAB) (Atom N270). :-)

I am slowly working on a replacement for the above computer. This replacement is a few years younger and is reported to have significantly better battery life. It has a 64-bit dual core processor, but the manufacturer set a flag in the BIOS to disable the 64-bit mode, and so I have put 32-bit Slackware 14.2 on it.
 
Old 02-25-2020, 12:46 AM   #27
solarfields
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: slackalaxy.com
Distribution: Slackware, CRUX
Posts: 1,449

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
I have an Asus EeePC, with Slackware 14.2 installed, that I used as a server for my custom package repository in my home network. At some point I made the virtual machine where I build the packages run as a server, so the EeePC is in the closet.
 
Old 02-25-2020, 02:38 AM   #28
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,478
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982Reputation: 982
I use 32bit for ram constrained older machines and for ARM machines this far

Otherwise i run multilib on every other machine for maximum compatibility with older software of interest (one can never know in advance).
 
Old 02-25-2020, 06:44 AM   #29
mihaua
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2014
Location: ZP, Ukraine
Distribution: Slackware, Mageia, SalixOS, knoppix, RescueCD
Posts: 4
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I use Slackware 32bit
1) Core2 (2GB ram), AMD4550b (2GB ram) - some software need 32bit (and I not like multilibs), but plan to upgrade to 64bit,
2) Asus PC eee 4G (630Mhz, 1GB ram, 3,6GB ssd) - 32bit only - works fine, sse2 ready, to fit the drive I use btrfs compression + separate /boot. palemoon-32 so-so usable, have a problem with any video chat I have tried, even it work's, it lags, also many of chats require big bowser (chrome).
3) PIII-733Mhz (512Mb ram, 40GB hdd) - 32bit only - sse only, have a problem with Firefox, Midori and other big browsers which are sse2 optimized. And even opera-legacy 12.16, palemoon-sse running, but very slow - It seems to me that browsers/OS now totally unoptimized for sse arch, the same situation on Debian. Dillo, Lynx, Netsurf - work fine, but ugly.

Last edited by mihaua; 02-25-2020 at 06:45 AM.
 
Old 02-25-2020, 12:32 PM   #30
keithpeter
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2015
Location: 52:30N 1:55W
Distribution: Slackware 15.0, OpenBSD 7.4
Posts: 310

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Posting off a Thinkpad T42 that requires a non-PAE kernel. Has Slackware 14.2 32 bit installed and lilo.conf points to vmlinuz-huge. I update and boot this thing every couple of months and think if it needs recycling or not, then just put it back on the shelf. It runs xfce4 with 1Gb RAM and the original 40Gb hard drive. The screen is bright and clear and the keyboard is firm and responsive which is why I hang on to it.

I also happen to have a 32 bit install of 14.2 on my workhorse Thinkpad X61s. That machine is 64bit capable but it seemed like a good idea at the time. I'm not going to touch that install until 15 is out for a few months.

My Thinkpad L440 runs Slackware current pure 64 bit. I don't think I'm going to need multilib functionality for my very basic computing needs (default install + openoffice basically).

Last edited by keithpeter; 02-25-2020 at 12:52 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Exec format error BUT running 64 bit linux on 64 bit machine and file is ELF 64-BIT programming_in_linux Linux - Newbie 1 06-28-2019 10:20 PM
64 bit cpu-64 bit Ubuntu-are there 32 bit app issues? sofasurfer Ubuntu 7 04-09-2014 02:02 PM
64-bit or 32-bit Application on 64-bit Linux jjana123 Linux - General 4 05-06-2008 05:27 PM
Triple Boot Suse 10.3 32 bit, suse alpha 11.0 64 bit and Windows XP (32 Bit) 1kyle SUSE / openSUSE 1 02-28-2008 10:25 AM
32 bit or 64 bit install - is 32 bit easier for a newbie? dms05 Linux - Newbie 3 05-19-2006 03:05 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration