LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-02-2018, 12:08 PM   #16
ivandi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Québec, Canada
Distribution: CRUX, Debian
Posts: 528

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866

Tested so far:
  • domain and local logins (login,xdm,kdm) and session lock.
  • SSO domain shares access (dolphin)
  • SSO sftp (dolphin)
  • SSH SSO (PAM should work, but password logins are not recommended anyway)
  • HTTP SSO with mod_auth_kerb
  • IMAP dovecot with SSO and PAM (GSSAPI and LOGIN)
  • SMTP postfix with dovecot sasl (GSSAPI and LOGIN)

NOTES updated.

Happy New Year


Cheers
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-02-2018, 07:50 PM   #17
ZhaoLin1457
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,025

Rep: Reputation: 1214Reputation: 1214Reputation: 1214Reputation: 1214Reputation: 1214Reputation: 1214Reputation: 1214Reputation: 1214Reputation: 1214
Let me welcome your initiative.

Slackware really has serious problems in an office.
 
Old 01-03-2018, 02:08 AM   #18
a4z
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,727

Rep: Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742Reputation: 742
thanks for your work, ivandi!
 
Old 01-13-2018, 02:37 PM   #19
ivandi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Québec, Canada
Distribution: CRUX, Debian
Posts: 528

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866
Tested so far:
  • DHCP clients updating their DNS records (SAMBA INTERNAL DNS)
  • Domain provision with BIND9_DLZ (basically works, didn't test it further)
  • NFSv4 with KRB5 Security (within Samba AD domain)
  • Openldap + Krb5 for central authentication (basically works, didn't test it further, probably sssd will be better than nss-pam-ldapd + pam-krb5)
NOTES updated.


Cheers
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-14-2018, 03:25 PM   #20
ivandi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Québec, Canada
Distribution: CRUX, Debian
Posts: 528

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866
OK, CUPS SSO works. And ... RSH works with PAM (huh).

So, the repository is perfectly usable. If you follow my NOTES setting up a Samba AD domain with Single Sign-on (SSO) works out of the box. Anyway, if netatalk doesn't work please let me know, but better send patches.

REMINDER:
PAM is a nice lady, but keep an active root login while playing with /etc/pam.d/system-auth.
Kerberos can be a messy dog, it won't obey root. RTFM carefully.


Have fun

Cheers
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-31-2018, 07:06 AM   #21
horizn
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2015
Location: UK and Poland
Distribution: Slackware + Debian + Ubuntu
Posts: 170

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
What is the current state of that? Will it work on Slackware-Current with KDE5 from Eric?
 
Old 01-31-2018, 08:17 AM   #22
ivandi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Québec, Canada
Distribution: CRUX, Debian
Posts: 528

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866
Quote:
Originally Posted by horizn View Post
What is the current state of that?
It works fine on Slackware-current with the stock KDE4.

Quote:
Originally Posted by horizn View Post
Will it work on Slackware-Current with KDE5 from Eric?
No idea, KDE5 is not part of current for now.


Cheers
 
Old 01-31-2018, 01:12 PM   #23
stormtracknole
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL
Posts: 1,263

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Ivandi,

If one wants to build this from source, what would be the best way to accomplish this? Using the spamware.SlackBuild or individually? Also, do I need to remove certain packages from the baseline install before doing this? Thank you very much for spending time doing this for the community.
 
Old 01-31-2018, 02:18 PM   #24
ivandi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Québec, Canada
Distribution: CRUX, Debian
Posts: 528

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866
Quote:
Originally Posted by stormtracknole View Post
If one wants to build this from source, what would be the best way to accomplish this? Using the spamware.SlackBuild or individually? Also, do I need to remove certain packages from the baseline install before doing this?
The intended way is to use spamware.SlackBuild on a full install of Slackware-current. It will follow the build order and run the the slackbuild for every package if there is no a txz package or the slackbuild is newer than the package. Then it will upgradepkg --reinstall --install-new.

In every package directory the getsrc.sh if executable is sourced by the slackbuild to download the source. This could fail sometimes because of endless redirections from github or sourceforge. You can download the source manually and make getsrc.sh non-executable.

And finally after all packages are built and installed you can use the genmeta.sh in /meta to generate PACKAGES.TXT and CHECKSUMS.md5.


Cheers
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-31-2018, 07:43 PM   #25
stormtracknole
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL
Posts: 1,263

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivandi View Post
The intended way is to use spamware.SlackBuild on a full install of Slackware-current. It will follow the build order and run the the slackbuild for every package if there is no a txz package or the slackbuild is newer than the package. Then it will upgradepkg --reinstall --install-new.

In every package directory the getsrc.sh if executable is sourced by the slackbuild to download the source. This could fail sometimes because of endless redirections from github or sourceforge. You can download the source manually and make getsrc.sh non-executable.

And finally after all packages are built and installed you can use the genmeta.sh in /meta to generate PACKAGES.TXT and CHECKSUMS.md5.


Cheers
Thank you!
 
Old 06-23-2018, 11:38 AM   #26
ivandi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Québec, Canada
Distribution: CRUX, Debian
Posts: 528

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866
The current is shaping up and the stuff here looks quite stable too. So I encourage those of you who would like to use PAM and Kerberos in Slackware to give these packages a try and report back.

I have no problem maintaining this project for my own needs, but now that we have /extra/pure-alsa-system/ I wonder if we could also have /extra/pam+kerberos


Cheers.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-23-2018, 12:23 PM   #27
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Honestly, I hope someday to see instead a /extra/pure-non-pam+kerberos but I know I ask too much...

Last edited by Darth Vader; 06-23-2018 at 12:25 PM.
 
Old 06-23-2018, 04:03 PM   #28
kjhambrick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib
Posts: 2,159

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivandi View Post
The current is shaping up and the stuff here looks quite stable too. So I encourage those of you who would like to use PAM and Kerberos in Slackware to give these packages a try and report back.

I have no problem maintaining this project for my own needs, but now that we have /extra/pure-alsa-system/ I wonder if we could also have /extra/pam+kerberos
Cheers.
Thanks ivandi !

Downloaded a fresh copy spamware via your sync-spamware.sh script.

Will set up a pair of Slackware64 14.2+current VMWare Machines and I'll take spamware for a spin as an AD DC and an AD Client on a VMWare Network along with a Win7 Pro Client in the next couple weeks.

Thanks again !

-- kjh( still love that name -- it is a keeper )
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-01-2018, 09:19 AM   #29
ivandi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Québec, Canada
Distribution: CRUX, Debian
Posts: 528

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866Reputation: 866
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
I've been testing PAM and Kerberos here and have given quite some thought to trying to get them merged (or at least in /testing) so that we can have proper support for Active Directory and NFS.
Well, better late than never



Lately I've been reviewing the configs in /etc/pam.d with the idea to ensure consistent behavior across all PAM enabled services. There are still some tweaks to do but I think I am pretty close. Give it a try.


Cheers
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-02-2018, 08:39 PM   #30
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,978

Rep: Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556Reputation: 1556
Every time I see the title of this thread I think of...


Cooking up some Spam. <grin>
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANN] Soma 2.13.0 dive Slackware 12 12-17-2017 07:06 PM
[ANN] mkslack 4.8 dive Slackware 0 05-05-2015 06:45 AM
[ANN] Soma 2.10.0 dive Slackware 2 04-16-2015 04:32 AM
[ANN] mkslack 4.7 dive Slackware 1 04-12-2015 12:34 PM
[ANN] Soma 2.7.1 dive Slackware 8 08-27-2011 03:04 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration