Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It appears that the client is communicating with ntp1. The poll time is 1024 seconds so it will take awhile to get anywhere.
I believe that the ntp1 time difference is greater then ntp2. Do you really need two time servers. If so you might want to try setting them up as peers or syncing ntp2 to ntp1.
the time difference between them it maybe a matter of seconds. it can be that bad ,isn't it ? maybe I should try to sync ntp2 to ntp1 but I tried to do that by ntpdate -b command but getting the same output (also when I tried in both of them) :
Code:
ntpdate[9770]: no server suitable for synchronization found
thats the way you meant for syncing each other right ? do I need to change again something in conf file of the servers for that ?
It appears that the client is communicating with ntp1. The poll time is 1024 seconds so it will take awhile to get anywhere.
I believe that the ntp1 time difference is greater then ntp2. Do you really need two time servers. If so you might want to try setting them up as peers or syncing ntp2 to ntp1.
hey Michael,
something very strange you know...
look what I've found so far.
when I try ntpdate -d command on one of the clients, look what I get:
but when I try to do the same but now with ntp1 server, I can see the host trying to reach the server but none packets recieved from it, ntp1 server dropping the incoming packets:
Code:
[root@host1 ~]# ntpdate -d ntp1
14 Jul 10:40:00 ntpdate[19955]: ntpdate 4.2.2p1@1.1570-o Mon Jun 4 15:13:03 UTC 2007 (1)
Looking for host ntp1 and service ntp
host found : ntp1
transmit(172.17.201.6)
transmit(172.17.201.6)
transmit(172.17.201.6)
transmit(172.17.201.6)
transmit(172.17.201.6)
172.17.201.6: Server dropped: no data
server 172.17.201.6, port 123
stratum 0, precision 0, leap 00, trust 000
refid [172.17.201.6], delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000
transmitted 4, in filter 4
reference time: 00000000.00000000 Thu, Feb 7 2036 0:28:16.000
originate timestamp: 00000000.00000000 Thu, Feb 7 2036 0:28:16.000
transmit timestamp: cfe866e3.99c70435 Wed, Jul 14 2010 10:40:03.600
filter delay: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
filter offset: 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000
offset 0.000000
14 Jul 10:40:04 ntpdate[19955]: no server suitable for synchronization found
when I tring to reach the host from ntp1 server, for some reason it succeed , look :
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
