Linux - NewsThis forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
What Microsoft should be looking at is profit per product sold. From that perspective, Office is a much stronger offering than Windows. Additionally, Office rarely gets them bad press, certainly not the case with Windows. So, their concentration should be towards selling more copies of Office, not of Windows. Face it, people are going to switch to alternative OSes, despite Office not being available, even if it means sacrificing some functionality (and, as an experienced user of OO and Office, I am willing to say without hesitation that Office is MUCH better). But, if they offered Office for Linux people would buy it, even those that would have switched regardless. I am not a business or software expert, but I think they are throwing the baby out with the bath water.
I think it is actually a two edged sword, as they could profit from other platforms, but they could also lose their main platform altogether... And they don't want that, as that means le$$ moeny from Windows® sales (including support and subscriptions, which make a whole lot of money). If Office alone could provide them with the same amount of money they do with both Office and Windows® packaging, then maybe they'd consider it, but still in such a case, offering Windows® subscriptions and continued support programmes means even more $$, so highly unlikely they'll start doing so... If even more people migrated to alternative platforms (not including Mac), then maybe preassure would build up, but that's sadly not the case. People are migrating, steadily and daily, but not in numbers high enough to warrant such investment and potential loss.
I dont think microsoft will port. from a business standpoint why would you port office to an OS that you consistantly ingnore. theey would only be validating that linux is stable and usable. more people would look into this new thing that microsoft backs,,linux. by doing this they would spread the word of linux which more visablity would mean more people might be tempted to switch.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.