Linux - NewsThis forum is for original Linux News. If you'd like to write content for LQ, feel free to contact us.
All threads in the forum need to be approved before they will appear.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Oh well, life is never dull in the computing world. Most people are pragmatists though - they'll formulate a plan B but stick with GitHub to see if the service becomes negatively impacted by the acquisition.
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by fido_dogstoyevsky
I read this ("The hostility between Microsoft and Linux is well and truly over") whilst having my morning coffee - I need a new keyboard.
If this is the case then, Linux has entered the embrace/assimilated phase of Microsoft's strategy. The tea leaves predicted this when they became a major donor and contributor to the Linux Foundation/Kernel.
To borrow a phrase from a great PC game (Crusader): There are dark days ahead me Lord.
Sadly the fate of Linux is in the hands of an uneasy consortium of google, Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, HP, Intel and others (in no particular order).
For many users this current situation is not only a "nothing to worry about" scenario, it is in fact desirable.
The recent CoC - a brain fart of the useful idiots in the feminist/PC faction - is also "nothing to worry about".
And of course, if you disagree with these mouthpieces you obviously need measuring up for new aluminium foil headgear.
I prefer the good old days when greasy hippies from US universities and hobbyists wrote software and put together their own distributions and defined the licences which made FOSS what it is today. The new era of "open source" where everything has to be corporate owned, controlled and influenced and where Red Hat users and sysadmins are apologists for this and arrogantly believe it was all written for them in order to earn a living from support contracts, bores me to tears. I really don't care about your vocation (or whether or not Red-Hat-systemd-gnome-OS is best thing since sliced bread [for you]).
I would honestly rather just run MS Windows than be be part of that horrible farce.
Sadly the fate of Linux is in the hands of an uneasy consortium of google, Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, HP, Intel and others (in no particular order).
For many users this current situation is not only a "nothing to worry about" scenario, it is in fact desirable.
The recent CoC - a brain fart of the useful idiots in the feminist/PC faction - is also "nothing to worry about".
And of course, if you disagree with these mouthpieces you obviously need measuring up for new aluminium foil headgear.
I prefer the good old days when greasy hippies from US universities and hobbyists wrote software and put together their own distributions and defined the licences which made FOSS what it is today. The new era of "open source" where everything has to be corporate owned, controlled and influenced and where Red Hat users and sysadmins are apologists for this and arrogantly believe it was all written for them in order to earn a living from support contracts, bores me to tears. I really don't care about your vocation (or whether or not Red-Hat-systemd-gnome-OS is best thing since sliced bread [for you]).
I would honestly rather just run MS Windows than be be part of that horrible farce.
You've quoted an entire post, added your own emphasis and taken that statement out of context.
I highlighted the sentence to show that it was the one that my comment referred to. A time-honoured technique on forums.
What I am saying is that if you are so peeved with the state of Linux at the moment that you feel you want to go back to Microsoft then there is *nothing* stopping you. Go ahead. The rest of us will carry on using it without running around loudly exclaiming that the sky is falling on our heads.
I highlighted the sentence to show that it was the one that my comment referred to. A time-honoured technique on forums.
You've taken that statement out of context.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hydrurga
What I am saying is that if you are so peeved with the state of Linux at the moment that you feel you want to go back to Microsoft then there is *nothing* stopping you. Go ahead
I'm fully aware of that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hydrurga
The rest of us will carry on using it without running around loudly exclaiming that the sky is falling on our heads.
The "rest of you" (argumentum ad populum) can use whatever you like, I have not suggested that anyone stop using anything...
Man, what are you on about? I included the whole post so that anyone else could read the entire thing, and highlighted the part I was replying to. There is no "out of context" - the context was there for everyone to see. If you're going to write something then you shouldn't throw up your hands in horror when someone else quotes what you've written.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.