Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
"Distros" are simply different ways of packaging (and servicing ...) more-or-less the same thing. It really doesn't matter too much which one you choose, as long as the packages are kept current by whomever is responsible for doing that. It matters most that you keep the packages up-to-date, especially the security-related ones.
Incidentally, this was an underpinning of Red Hat's business model since the very beginning, which makes it by far the most profitable "IPO stock" I ever bought. They charge money for servicing, and they provide a service-level agreement (SLA) regarding it. This enables them to take on big-business requirements and to be profitable doing so.
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by salparadise
I just never was a distro hopper and can't relate...
Too much choice overwhelms.
i second that
i can understand 'distro shopping', eg: trying a few distros before deciding on one, then sticking with that one, and only 'hopping' when your distro of choice for whatever reason no longer does what you need/want it to do.
my short jog to Ubuntu was more out of necessity than choice (work related), but the moment i was able to put Fedora back on the machine, I did
my only other hop was between redhat (the oler NON enterprise versions) and Fedora, which isn't exactly a big 'hop'
Tried a few distros when I "discovered" Linux in 2004. Slackware 10.0 was the first I installed in late '04/ early '05. I never thought any of the other distros were bad, just that they didn't suit me. And I've lost interest in trying any others, now. Sticking with Slack for as long as it or I last.
Over the years, I've tried just about all the popular distros many times but I've stuck with Arch as my default distro for more than 10 years now. That doesn't keep me from trying other distros from time to time just to see how they compare. I see no reason to leave Arch as long as it's keeping me happy.
My desktop computers have always run Red Hat, Fedora, or CentOS. I tried Debian Stable once, when I was getting exasperated by the increasingly experimental nature of Fedora, but fled back after 3 weeks. My little Thinkpad got Salix because it's too slow for CentOS.
On the other hand, as you may have noticed, I post reviews on this site, so my total number of distros used (or attempted, in some dire cases) currently stands at 113.
Greetz
I continually play with many distros to see if they're doing anything cool (usually not) amd to be able to speak intelligently about them from experience rather than from ignorant bias. I play on those but it is usually more than just a cursory couple of days. I try to login a few hundred hours if the install isn't totally whack.
I play around on those and they change after a few months but I work (and play games and videos) in Slackware and have since 1999. I can see no reason for that to change anytime soon.
Though I've used a number of different distros (I had two Dells that came with Ubuntu back in the good old days when you could get Dells with Ubuntu easily), I've always had Slackware on at least one computer since my first Linux experience, which was with Slackware in April 2005.
My next longest continuous Linux distro is with Debian which has been on this here computer since Lenny and for about six months on one of my laptops a couple of years before that (that laptop died after five years of good and faithful service).
Are these business Desktops or personal? Have you run into any situation where you had to move to Windows/dual boot for compatibility?
These are home computers, but basically for office-style use. As for Windows, my only experience of that was when I did some work for a society on their computer about 20 years ago. I've been given .doc files and had no trouble with them, and when I've done any journalism they've wanted plain text.
About 6 months appears to be the limit for me. When I find a distro I like something usually happens that makes me switch. I ran Solus then it died, ran Watt 7.5 and the developer switched bases, now running MX-14 and Mint...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.