Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am wondering, because i get this message while rpmdrake is running that recognizes exactly the version of Mandrake I am running. It refers to it as "Download CD's."
I am curious: Is there any real difference between the version that you download at say Mandrake's download site and the version that you see at CompUSA? Is it worth spending the $40-some-odd dollars for it?
I was talking with someone yesterday and they told me not to try the cheapie ones you see at CompUSA (the eval versions I believe) and be suspectful of downloads from Planet Mirror and in some cases from the distribution's FTP site... I did not understand why so I brought the question here...
well, you generally pay for two reasons, a paper manual and support. oh and a nice coloured box. that's the only reason to buy. you can buy extended versions of oses aswell like the mandrake power pack, but i don't gerneally see the point, as you can dl it all anyway
Originally posted by therion12 Its good to support the linux community once it a while
personally i don't see how giving redhat, a company with a current anual turnover of $1.2bn, $50 is gonna do anythign to help the open source community. if you want to support the "community" give money to sites like this, or use the paypal, and similar, accounts that open source writers setup.
Originally posted by acid_kewpie if you want to support the "community" give money to sites like this, or use the paypal, and similar, accounts that open source writers setup.
Does getting your local kernel hacker drunk count?
Anyway, to somehow wander back onto topic, yes there usually is a difference. The best example is Mandy 8.0.
The store purchased box, or at least the only one I ever bought, for someone else, with their money; damn I'm a freeloader, had 3 CDs: two system RPM CDs and a Contrib CD. The Contrib CD had a mountain of non-GPL stuff on it that in a rare few cases was actually pay-licensed by Mandrake. I think... regardless, the contrib CD wasn't part of the download release.
Then there were the download CDs, both of them, with most of what you would need for a normal desktop on CD1.
Then there was an entire distro-set on 1 CD that was distributed in copies of LinuxWorld and some other mags. I even got one free with a network card once, which was an old trick of TurboLinux. Heck, when everything is in RPM format, its easy to juggle around the full distrobution set accross 1 to 3 CDs depending on what license/space constraint you are limited to.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.