Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
it's not about the distro you use, it's the software yo urun inside it. mandrake 2007 will run fine on that gear if you stop useing gnome2 / kde3 for example. try xfce, fluxbox instead.
it's not about the distro you use, it's the software yo urun inside it. mandrake 2007 will run fine on that gear if you stop useing gnome2 / kde3 for example. try xfce, fluxbox instead.
Cool i received 2 replies in minutes
yeap i am using KDE 3.5 and now i start to add fluxbox.
what about ctkroeker's reply on Slackware, Gentoo, DSL, Puppy Linux, Deli. vs Mandriva?
Some friends offered me to install a live version of Linux on a harddisk. Can this be a good solution or Just the softwares matter as acid_kewpie replied?
those distro's are generally lighter, but they are lighter becuase they don't build all bells and whistles in to them, i.e. the stuff like kde which you're probably using. you can make slackware as slow as you want to though, if you're hearts set on running XGL and KDE3.4 with all sorts of other junk...
The fastest distro you can run is certainly a tailored LFS (Linux From Scratch), as everything will be built (and thus optimized) for your computer ... But it will take ages to have it fine, which is a bit too much for standard use ... Gentoo is almost the same (a bit less optimized, and a bit less time to install, but it's still a matter of day for a typical install)
Keep your system as light as possible is a good thing ! You can also try to rebuild your kernel if boot time is too long ...
i understand the logic acid_kewpie
at least up to this time i uninstalled all games unnecessary many softwares from software management(reduced many processes) i feel someting more better.
i think i have to learn more how to build LFS and how to compile the kernel myself when installing.
acid_kewpie, I think exactly the same as you ... Keep it light (or don't run pointless crap, as you say) is the most important part ... And no matter the distro you choose, even the better system will run like crap if you overload it with useless CPU consuming fancy stuffs ...
i understand the logic acid_kewpie
at least up to this time i uninstalled all games unnecessary many softwares from software management(reduced many processes) i feel someting more better.
i think i have to learn more how to build LFS and how to compile the kernel myself when installing.
well one thing at a time.. get used to linuix first. note that uninstalling games won't really affect anythign that disk space. as if they aren't actually running, they use no resources.
today i tried 2 versions of live cds mandriva one and suse live 9.2
in that computer suse live was really faster than mandriva one,
also i installed mandriva 2007, fedora core 6 and suse 9.0 for last hours
suse 9.0 seemed faster.
i am now using suse 9.0 installed on that computer but i am trying to learn ways to install live suse 9.2 on hardrive too, and compare both of them again.
I feel that suse is good for now later(starting this evening)
i ll try to learn the concepts you explained above by time.
At university next year, i ll attend Computer Science
i think i ll improve my linux skills(!) there very much.
I can recommend Suse for newbies like me "for now".
you're recommending an old version of the software for newies? no way... that's just horrible when you start having problems gettgin up to date software for it and such like. use 10.2 or pick a different distro.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.