Seeking Input for the Next Linux Distro: What Features Would You Like to See?
Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Seeking Input for the Next Linux Distro: What Features Would You Like to See?
Hey Linux enthusiasts!
I'm embarking on the exciting journey of designing a Linux distribution for newcomers, and I'm eager to hear your insights and preferences. With the vast array of distros available, each with its own unique offerings, I aim to develop a Linux distro that serves as the ultimate replacement for Windows.
In considering various base distributions like Arch, Debian, or Fedora, I'm particularly inclined towards Fedora for its stability, aesthetically pleasing customized GNOME desktop, gaming-centric features, and its tendency to provide preinstalled drivers, apps, and dependencies right out of the box. Additionally, I'm exploring the possibility of making it systemd-free to ensure lightning-fast boot times.
While I draw inspiration from existing projects like Nobara Linux, which emphasizes gaming-centric features and includes many components out of the box, I believe there's ample opportunity to innovate and provide an even better or cleaner alternative.
Before diving into development, I'm eager to hear from you! What features and functionalities do you envision in the next Linux distro? What aspects of Windows would you like to see replicated or improved upon? Whether it's about desktop environments, package managers, gaming support, system performance, or anything else, your input will be invaluable in shaping the direction of this project.
Let's work together to create the ultimate Linux experience—a seamless and intuitive alternative to Windows that meets the needs and preferences of users worldwide.
Share your ideas, preferences, and suggestions in the comments below, and let's make this vision a reality!
I aim to develop a Linux distro that serves as the ultimate replacement for Windows.
What will you do differently from all the other attempts at doing this?
Quote:
In considering various base distributions like Arch, Debian, or Fedora, I'm particularly inclined towards Fedora for its stability, aesthetically pleasing customized GNOME desktop, gaming-centric features, and its tendency to provide preinstalled drivers, apps, and dependencies right out of the box. Additionally, I'm exploring the possibility of making it systemd-free to ensure lightning-fast boot times.
Arch without systemd is Artix (also Oberon and a few others).
Debian without systemd is Devuan (also AntiX and a few others).
Fedora without systemd is ... well, a sign of someone who needs a lot more experience.
I would say it should go in the reverse order. First you need to have an excellent idea (which is good enough to make a new distro) and you can implement it and distribute it. But why do you want to create a new distro if you have nothing to put into it? Can you really speed up boot? Can you make it really "gaming centric"? Do you really have a unique offer?
Can you manage all those preinsalled drivers and apps?
In most cases there is no need to create a new distro, but an "addon" package.
A lot of the hundreds of distros, plus hundreds that never got off the ground, all want to be the ultimate replacement for Windows.
For something unique, bottom up, and virtualbox targeted (to avoid chasing a zillion unique device drivers), my personal learning-dream is:
Leverage the minimal init and apps of a distro like 4M/antiX/mll
And .config the absolute minimal kernel for the totally standardized default virtualbox devices!
Then anyone interested could collaborate, because they have the exact same (virtual) PC! Reproducibility Utopia & intense bottom-up learning Heaven!
Comments welcome (other than that I should have the motivation to do it myself LOL).
Instead of a distro how about a script that does the configuration of some existing base distro. Debian, Fedora, Arch, Slackware, or Suse. Stop trying to reinvent the wheel with yet another distro. And for the love of all things sacred the world doesn't need another "based on Ubuntu". There are to many that have no following as it is. Just a waste of bandwidth.
Instead of a distro how about a script that does the configuration of some existing base distro. Debian, Fedora, Arch, Slackware, or Suse. Stop trying to reinvent the wheel with yet another distro. And for the love of all things sacred the world doesn't need another "based on Ubuntu". There are to many that have no following as it is. Just a waste of bandwidth.
Yes that's what I'm aiming for, systemd free fedora with pretty much everything out of box included that fedora doesn't provide inspired by nobara
I would say it should go in the reverse order. First you need to have an excellent idea (which is good enough to make a new distro) and you can implement it and distribute it. But why do you want to create a new distro if you have nothing to put into it? Can you really speed up boot? Can you make it really "gaming centric"? Do you really have a unique offer?
Can you manage all those preinsalled drivers and apps?
In most cases there is no need to create a new distro, but an "addon" package.
Yes that's all what I'm aiming to, i was just taking opinions if configuring fedora such a way and contributing to existing project would be good idea or not.
I got answers, thanks.
For systemd free on fedora i agree with you upon some research fedora's everything rely on systemD so it's a pretty bad idea to replace init as for gamers it won't be able run many programs, the thing i see missing in both fedora and nobara is performance optimization they both give the same fps in games, i'm trying kernel optimizations like implementing new rust written scheduler in kernel proven to show 15% performance gains in some documentations.
OK, I'll be convinced when I see your work.
Good luck
Already did a debian respin with beautified gnome, live weather conky and dependencies missing to run many apps, snap flatpak AIO app outlet pretty much everything need to be set up on stock debian before daily driver for beginners you can check: http://masq-os.vercel.app
Fedora fans are more than debian specifically when it comes to gamers for stability and now I'm on way to create more than just beautified respin with distinct performance gains
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.