Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am using an Asus E202s. It is limited by its dual core processor and 2gb of ran which i un-upgradable. I am a new user to Linux but I have tried them booted in a live environment. I want to install a low spec Linux OS onto this laptop. I have mainly typing related work, so I don't need anything else. What OS should I choose? I have narrowed down my options between puppy linux, antix and lxle.
Please help.
Thank you.
It's not 7 years old yet, so the only notable limitation is 2G of RAM, which shouldn't be significant for your stated use.
There are several DEs suitable for a 2G environment besides those used by Puppy, AntiX & LXLE that can be installed on any of the distros in wide use. TDE can be installed in place of or in addition to the default DE on Debian, Fedora, Mageia, openSUSE, *buntu and others. KDE/Plasma can actually be quite lightweight, but to lean it down requires a good bit of pruning of preselected optional settings. LXDE, LXLE's DE, is available via the same list above and lots more, and the same can be said of the WMs and DEs provided by Puppy and AntiX.
IOW, your best choice may be better based on more emphasis on support (popularity = more people to help with your questions) for your distro and your preferred DE or WM, and less on professed "weight". For what you want, and what you've narrowed it to, I'd pick LXLE. The other two IMO are intended for older, more limited hardware than yours.
I want to install a low spec Linux OS onto this laptop. I have mainly typing related work, so I don't need anything else.
Alpine can be very light too, and is a rather common distro.
In general though you might look at running a bare Window Manager instead of a full Desktop Environment. FVWM is light, but highly customizable as shown by the Crystal theme. Ouroboros might be the lightest of all though.
The programs are going to use a lot of RAM though regardless. Nothing will help you with Chromium or Firefox, for example.
How complex is the typing? If it's mostly text, even LaTeX, then you could look at Geany or Emacs (either X or noX). If you are talking about standard word processing then you can experiment with AbiWord, Calligra, and LibreOffice.
I have tried them booted in a live environment.
...
I have narrowed down my options between puppy linux, antix and lxle.
Use whichever of the three you enjoyed using the most. If you can't decide then roll a dice.
You can try one for a few days/weeks/months and if you find it not to your tastes and not sufficiently configurable then you can state exactly what you liked/disliked to get more useful targetted advice.
Location: as far S and E as I want to go in the U.S.
Distribution: Fossapup64
Posts: 224
Rep:
antiX would be my choice. It works on most any old and/or low-spec computers.
A swap file may be used -- documentation on the subject is available at the main site -- easy!
For any who might be wondering what it means to run on old hardware, here's some data:
Code:
# inxi -CGS
System:
Host: gx62b Kernel: 5.18.15-1-default arch: x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: KDE Plasma v: 5.25.5 Distro: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20220925
CPU:
Info: single core model: Intel Pentium 4 bits: 64 type: MT cache: L2: 2 MiB
Speed (MHz): avg: 3192 min/max: N/A cores: 1: 3192 2: 3192
Graphics:
Device-1: Intel 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics driver: i915 v: kernel
Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 21.1.4 with: Xwayland v: 22.1.3 driver: X:
loaded: intel unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa gpu: i915
resolution: 1920x1200~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: i915 (: 945G) v: 2.1 Mesa 22.2.0
## boot to multi-user.target, login on vtty3
# date; free
Tue Sep 27 14:46:59 EDT 2022
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 2012508 285580 1602600 6260 287688 1726928
Swap: 1133548 0 1133548
## reboot to graphical.target, login on vtty3
# free
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 2012508 350020 1395888 38828 464652 1662488
Swap: 1133548 0 1133548
> display manager usage: 64440
## reboot to graphical.target, login to IceWM session running 2 tab Konsole
## default dark wallpaper/background
# free
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 2012508 396204 1259136 47288 565708 1616304
Swap: 1133548 0 1133548
> IceWM/Konsole usage: 46184
## reboot to graphical.target, login to KDE/Plasma session running 2 tab Konsole
## no wallpaper; solid dark blue background
# date; free
Tue Sep 27 15:12:06 EDT 2022
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 2012508 670204 890096 125672 742708 1342304
Swap: 1133548 0 1133548
> Excess of Plasma usage over IceWM: 274000; total usage: 320184
## load mcedit
# date; free
Tue Sep 27 15:20:58 EDT 2022
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 2012508 685996 873712 125884 743548 1326512
Swap: 1133548 0 1133548
> mcedit usage: 15792 (for building this data file)
## load LibreOffice Writer with blank document
# date; free
Tue Sep 27 15:23:56 EDT 2022
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 2012508 862848 518048 224932 1024980 1149660
Swap: 1133548 0 1133548
> LO Writer usage: 176852
## load Palemoon 31.3.0 with 5 existing tabs
# date; free
Tue Sep 27 15:25:40 EDT 2022
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 2012508 1069592 211664 295996 1196260 942916
Swap: 1133548 0 1133548 ^ 46.8%
> Palemoon usage: 206744
What the numbers don't show is I've turned off all but one automatically started background services in Plasma. So, running Konsole, LibreOffice Writer & Palemoon web browser in KDE/Plasma on openSUSE Tumbleweed consumes 53.2% of 2G total RAM, leaving 46.8% free, while doing same on IceWM instead of a minimalist Plasma would consume 39.5%, leaving 60.5% free. Whether IceWM or Plasma, swap is not touched. A "lightweight" WM or DE provides extra headroom, but is not necessary with a 2G of RAM PC or laptop. Modern conveniences needn't be foregone.
This math changes when you start open bloated webpages. Opening just one web page in a full-featured web browser can take more RAM than your OS with light WM.
Isn't it mandatory for each member in threads like this to recommend his/her own? I think there are millions of threads "what distro" and all of them are filled with personal favorites.
OK, I hate to do it, but I'm doing my duty here. I recommend Gentoo of course. Gentoo allows you strip down the binaries and reduces memory footprint, leaving more for applications. My desktop uses bare 100 MiB with GUI up, ready to use. Indeed, you cannot build much with weak CPU and 2 GiB RAM, but no worries. You can build in NFS chroot from a more powerful machine. It is all pure fun, sleepless nights, abandoned girlfriends, you are going to miss all that and much more if you do not install Gentoo!
Isn't it mandatory for each member in threads like this to recommend his/her own? I think there are millions of threads "what distro" and all of them are filled with personal favorites.
OK, I hate to do it, but I'm doing my duty here. I recommend Gentoo of course. Gentoo allows you strip down the binaries and reduces memory footprint, leaving more for applications. My desktop uses bare 100 MiB with GUI up, ready to use. Indeed, you cannot build much with weak CPU and 2 GiB RAM, but no worries. You can build in NFS chroot from a more powerful machine. It is all pure fun, sleepless nights, abandoned girlfriends, you are going to miss all that and much more if you do not install Gentoo!
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,506
Rep:
Of course, if typing is all/mainly what you want to do, there is the Wordgrinder program that runs from a command line, no need to even install a graphical environment of any sort.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.