LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-14-2005, 05:41 PM   #1
otchie1
Registered User
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 560

Rep: Reputation: 30
Gentoo vs Slackware


on an acer laptop.....

Just because I fancied a change and craved a 2.6.x kernel, I decided to run with Gentoo instead of my usual Slackware install. Okay, different distro so things were never going to go as smoothly but i kinda like that anyway.

3 freakin DAYS later it finally boots to kde. 3 DAYS? What on earth was it doing? KDE alone took over 12 hours to churn 87 packages through emerge.

Slack normally goes on in under an hour albeit with a 2.4.26 kernel but that is time enough to have sound, X, Gnome & KDE all humming nicely.

emerge was cool...network updated files were cool (no problems downloading after editing out the IPv6 mirrors lmao)

I know that Gentoo 2005.0 is out shortly with a graphical installer...maybe that'll shave a few days off the install time...lolololol

A shame really as I wanted to run a new distro and Gentoo looked good but seriously why would anyone bother?
 
Old 02-14-2005, 05:59 PM   #2
Moloko
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 729

Rep: Reputation: 30
Compiling specifically for a system has a certain charm, but it's too personal to even try to begin a rational discussion about it. What Gentoo has going for itself is that it stands out. Most distro's are too much alike these days.

I prefer precompiled Debian packages . Why Debian? Dunno, it's what I got first and I like it.
 
Old 02-14-2005, 09:11 PM   #3
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,153

Rep: Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125
Bit more reading would have saved you better than a couple of days of that.
There are *BINARY* downloads available for X and the desktops.
Pretty well optimized too, although I preferred to optimize for my specific hardware.

Welcome to the "learning opportunities" Gentoo offers.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 01:59 AM   #4
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,545

Rep: Reputation: 57
Quote:
3 DAYS? What on earth was it doing?
Compiling your entire system from source code. If you read the site you'd have known that.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 04:53 AM   #5
Skyline
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Debian/other
Posts: 2,104

Rep: Reputation: 45
>> 3 freakin DAYS later it finally boots to kde. 3 DAYS? <<

Yes, it can take some time if you do it that way - however, to have a brief look around Gentoo it is possible to do it in around 3 hours with a reasonable proccessor if you do a stage 3 from the universal live cd, portage snapshot from the cd, quick kernel compile etc, etc .... then post-install using the pacakges cd something like (for a light-weight kde):

# mount /mnt/cdrom
# export PKGDIR="/mnt/cdrom"
# emerge --usepkg kdelibs arts kdebase kdeartwork

Admitedly, it's more inflexible from this starting point, but it does give you a quick look , without a lengthy install time

Last edited by Skyline; 02-15-2005 at 05:13 AM.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 07:51 PM   #6
otchie1
Registered User
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 560

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by DJ P@CkMaN
Compiling your entire system from source code. If you read the site you'd have known that.
I read the install docs on gentoo.org several times and I didn't notice that. U sure it's written there in the only bit any one trying to install would actually read?

One of my pet hates is when important and unguessable information is buried in a manual with no external reference to it. I mean, if I don't know that I need to know about binary installs then how am i supposed to know that i need to know? And why isn't it the default mode? All I was doing was typing what was in the gentoo install file ;-(

To expand on my earlier theme, it only took 35 odd minutes to get slack 10.0 on with 2.4.26. Another half an hour and 2.6.10 was on with all its bells and whistles including Centrino wireless support. Gentoo's hardware optimising method needs to speed my box up by an awful lot of milliseconds to account for the extra 70 hours it takes to do it. lmao.

I'll give it another shot when 2004.0 comes out as it looks good but I'll set aside a wekend to do it :-)
 
Old 02-18-2005, 10:11 AM   #7
TanRanger
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
Gentoo Linux Documentation -- Chapter 2, Choosing the Right Installation Medium

"A stage1 is used when you want to bootstrap and build the entire system from scratch."

"Suitable for powerusers that know what they are doing"
"Takes a long time to finish the installation"
"If you don't intend to tweak the settings, it is a waste of time"

"A stage2 is used for building the entire system from a bootstrapped "semi-compiled" state."

"A stage3 installation contains a basic Gentoo Linux system that has been built for you."

"Stage3 is also required if you want to install Gentoo using prebuilt packages..."

It is assumed that you know what the word 'build' means in a Linux context.
 
Old 02-28-2005, 09:18 PM   #8
Deeze
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Debian - Sarge -- Slackware 10.1 - Dropline
Posts: 154

Rep: Reputation: 30
Oh, now, we all know how confusing this part is...

"Suitable for powerusers that know what they are doing"



and I guess some people think they're lying about this part...

"Takes a long time to finish the installation"

People need to research what they're doing BEFORE they do it. Guess this is just more proof that you really DON'T need to be "leet" to install Gentoo, all you need to do is to be able to type the commands as given (who knew? lol).
 
Old 03-03-2005, 04:35 PM   #9
Moloko
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 729

Rep: Reputation: 30
I recompiled Openoffice.org for fun in Debian optimized for the Athlon XP I have and it loads faster without quickstart and it's much snappier Too bad it took five hours to complete, but for large apps like that it's worth the trouble. Compiling everything a la Gentoo is too much for me
 
Old 03-03-2005, 06:08 PM   #10
EchO
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 15
sadly if you are installing Gentoo its assumed you know how Gentoo's package manager (portage) works, and thats via emerge and emerge compiles EVERYTHING from source if you dont have already prebuilt binaries at your disposal, for having software compiled for your system seems like a good idea for me, not having to look for packages online and just running a emerge --search makes me happy and i think anyone who has the ability to install ANY linux flavour should do some research before bitching about an install, aparently Sir your googling skills and general common sense are lacking, good luck next time, you lost this round.
 
Old 03-03-2005, 08:09 PM   #11
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 138Reputation: 138
A question about Gentoo.

I'm planning on downloading Gentoo and using it. However, I don't want to install the programs from the net as my net connection is too slow even to contemplate such a feat.

Is there a CD that already gives the source code of most programs for Gentoo so that I can do a stage 3 install and then install other packages from a CDROM rather than from the net?
 
Old 03-03-2005, 10:25 PM   #12
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,153

Rep: Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125Reputation: 4125
Certainly - go to gentoo and get, and read, the handbook.
It's all in there for network-less installs.
 
Old 03-06-2005, 09:59 AM   #13
Vindane
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 117

Rep: Reputation: 15
How could you possibly determine what kind of Linux system you want, based on how long it takes to initially install on your system? From what I've read about Gentoo, you only have to install it once! You don't have to download the new CD's and install them every 6 months to a year. You just emerge to keep your system constantly up-to-date.
Personally, I've decided to give it a try. I know installing for 3 days or one entire day is going to be long. But if I don't have to worry about reinstalling a new version of Gentoo on down the road, then I'll take some time out of my busy life to get it done.
 
Old 03-06-2005, 10:51 AM   #14
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
I read a recent review in which the reviewer said that on a fairly recent system, there is not much speed difference between a stage 1 and a stage 3 install. Never having done either, I can't comment on whether this is so. Then again, at some point, almost every package on your system will be reinstalled and recompiled, so you are only saving the initial install slowness.

Another member also pointed out that Vidalinux is a quick install and once you have pointed portage to the Gentoo sources and emerge-d, you have a Gentoo box.
 
Old 03-08-2005, 12:40 AM   #15
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 138Reputation: 138
I have installed Gentoo and I am still in the process of getting KDE for it.

Downloaded X and now trying the ATi drivers.

The fact I like about Gentoo is that it allows you to get a box up and running fairly quickly without the non-essentials (X, KDE and so on) and allows you to *choose* what you want rather than dump a whole bunch of binaries on your harddisk.

It takes time to "build" up a system, but I quite like the experience so far. Logical and very good documentation and you get your hands into the config files of Linux. It's a great learning distro and you find out what works "behind the scenes" in Linux.

I think I vote for Gentoo ahead of Slackware. Slackware is good, but it's no fun because I sort of like the "building your system" approach of Gentoo
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware Vs Gentoo.. raoqn Slackware 20 11-09-2006 05:55 PM
Gentoo vs. Slackware swinchen Slackware 45 05-27-2004 09:06 PM
Gentoo or Slackware? Huddlebum Linux - Distributions 10 12-01-2003 03:28 PM
slackware vs gentoo N_A_J_M Linux - Distributions 6 02-19-2003 05:41 PM
Slackware vs Gentoo Ed-Slack Linux - Distributions 7 01-21-2003 10:16 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration