LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-24-2010, 09:29 PM   #1
buccaneere
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 213

Rep: Reputation: 16
'Thinnest' distro of Linux?


Ubuntu seems to be becoming 'corporatized/commercial'.
Fedora was okay, but I never was able to configure some desktop settings.
PCLOS was the best/fastest, except for Broadcom wireless (I have 2 B/C machines).
SuSE was FAR worse than Ubuntu - way bogged down.
CentOS was my first Linux OS, I knew nothing about CLI then (still don't, but I can figure it out now).

Anybody with experience on LOTS of versions? What are the 'leanest' versions?

I don't 'game', or do anything that's resource-hungry. 3 of my 4 machines are pretty high-end new hardware.
 
Old 07-24-2010, 09:48 PM   #2
SalmonEater
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Location: Up the Big River w/o paddle
Distribution: Salent & Slackel
Posts: 131

Rep: Reputation: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by buccaneere View Post
Anybody with experience on LOTS of versions? What are the 'leanest' versions?

I don't 'game', or do anything that's resource-hungry. 3 of my 4 machines are pretty high-end new hardware.
Yeah, but first tell me briefly about your machine -- CPU, RAM, etc. Okay, I see you say "modern high end" but what about the slowest?

Look at the first two of my distros used.

Last edited by SalmonEater; 07-24-2010 at 09:55 PM. Reason: correct oversight
 
Old 07-24-2010, 09:49 PM   #3
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid/RPIOS
Posts: 4,887
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534
"Tiny Core Linux is a very small (10 MB) minimal Linux GUI Desktop"
http://tinycorelinux.com/

http://www.slitaz.org/en/ only 30mb

next would probably be Puppy then DSL.

Arch, Slackware and Debian can be as light as you want or as heavy depending on what de/wm you install.
 
Old 07-24-2010, 11:43 PM   #4
buccaneere
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 213

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by SalmonEater View Post
Yeah, but first tell me briefly about your machine -- CPU, RAM, etc. Okay, I see you say "modern high end" but what about the slowest?

Look at the first two of my distros used.
Yikes - looks like a few of them are just a few lines of code above DOS!!! Maybe 'pretty thin'??? Perhaps a distro with support in this sub-forum?

The oldest machine has XP on it; I just wiped Ubuntu. It's Dell D600 Pentium M 1.6G / 1G. Still pretty quick for 1.6, but not as quick as the other 3, all 'multi' core AMD's.

Thanks............
 
Old 07-25-2010, 12:30 AM   #5
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid/RPIOS
Posts: 4,887
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534
Dell D600 Pentium M 1.6G / 1G is fine. The problem with ubuntu is all the services that start by default.

Beats my old desktop that has a tiny Via 1.4, 2 gb ram and a pci nvidia 5200. Or my kids OLPC Xo, with a 400mgz cpu and 256mb ram, it is running Debian with e17 only thing slow is the actual boot up and that is because it is running on a 8gb sd card.

If it was me I would go with Debian with xfce or lxde, or Arch.
 
Old 07-25-2010, 12:46 AM   #6
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
That depends on what you mean by thin. As far as distros with forums here, Slackware runs lean, but a full install is anything but lean when it comes to disk space. Arch starts thin to the point of being a shell, a network connection and a package manager at the end of the initial install as far as I'm concerned. You'll have to add X and a DE yourself.
 
Old 07-25-2010, 09:15 AM   #7
fbt
Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: Chakra
Posts: 89

Rep: Reputation: 26
If you don't want a large corporate style distro, try any of the smaller distros, Mint, Mepis (my favorite) AntiX etc are built by smaller communities. Look at distrowatch and stay out of the top 10.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Linux Distro? Most complete out of the box Linux distro? P@trick99 Linux - Newbie 18 06-18-2014 07:19 AM
Help with deleting a linux distro partition to install another linux distro instead gexecuter Linux - Newbie 1 08-04-2007 04:44 PM
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: Distro hopping, Linux Format's distro mega-test LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-11-2007 04:47 AM
want to remove linux distro & replace it with a different distro deardoom Linux - Newbie 5 03-20-2006 06:14 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration