LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


View Poll Results: UNIX is better than WINDOWS
what?HELLO.i am UNIX. the best! 605 68.52%
whooa, wait a minute. Windows is BETTER than UNIX 48 5.44%
hoo-boy..i don't like both. 64 7.25%
errr...i don't know, what is UNIX afterall? 11 1.25%
windows?never heard of it... 155 17.55%
Voters: 883. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2010, 07:13 PM   #3616
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,933
Blog Entries: 45

Rep: Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165

Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post
Okay, yeah, I saw the infraction and will stop. I don't want a repeat of the demises of my PCWorld Forums and Ubuntu Forums accounts.
Why not go back and edit the posts. Remove the offenses.
 
Old 06-28-2010, 07:56 PM   #3617
rsciw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Essex (UK)
Distribution: Home: Debian/Ubuntu, Work: Ubuntu
Posts: 206

Rep: Reputation: 44
so now we're in Script Kiddie Kindergarten too?

@BrianL: With or without the frame?
 
Old 06-28-2010, 08:00 PM   #3618
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,302
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsciw View Post
so now we're in Script Kiddie Kindergarten too?
He'll grow out of it...maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsciw View Post
@BrianL: With or without the frame?
Yeah, and they were double-glazed too!
 
Old 06-28-2010, 08:02 PM   #3619
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck
Why not go back and edit the posts. Remove the offenses.
They've already been removed (or rather, edited) by the mods. But seriously, I agree about posting the malicious batch files. It doesn't matter if it's a joke; some poor soul might download it, not know what it is, run it to find out, and BAM!

Last edited by MrCode; 06-28-2010 at 08:04 PM.
 
Old 06-28-2010, 08:06 PM   #3620
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723
I agree. As entertaining as it is to think of putting a program up for download that will erase Windows machines, it's a really bad idea to do it in real life.

What if some poor person using Windows would innocently download it? How would you feel about that?
 
Old 06-28-2010, 08:13 PM   #3621
Kenny_Strawn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 62

Rep: Reputation: 56
My real goal was to erase all of M$'s servers: that's why I had edited that file to include the "xcopy" line that copies the fork bomb onto M$'s servers and pipes it through "cmd /c" to execute it on the M$ server end.

But yeah: I shouldn't have posted that file, as it is extremely malicious. All it was really for was to bump this thread, but it happened to get me a 9-point infraction.

I'll be careful next time!!!!!
 
Old 06-28-2010, 08:18 PM   #3622
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Quote:
My real goal was to erase all of M$'s servers
Pardon me if this sounds harsh, but do you really think that MS's servers would be insecure enough to allow something like a simple batch file to run like that? (I could be wrong, of course, but it doesn't seem likely )

Quote:
I'll be careful next time!!!!!
It would be best if you did. Please do "think before you type", as sudo says (if you're not in the sudoers file) .

Last edited by MrCode; 06-28-2010 at 08:19 PM. Reason: didn't need to waste page space with Kenny's [size=7]
 
Old 06-28-2010, 08:46 PM   #3623
dv502
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: USA - NYC
Distribution: Whatever icon you see!
Posts: 642

Rep: Reputation: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post
But yeah: I shouldn't have posted that file, as it is extremely malicious. All it was really for was to bump this thread, but it happened to get me a 9-point infraction.

I'll be careful next time!!!!!
Hey Kenny, I hate M$ and window$ too, but using malicious code to delete data is not the way to go even if they deserve it like the trolls we get here.

Also, you are leaving evidence as the suspect.

Last edited by dv502; 06-28-2010 at 08:50 PM.
 
Old 06-28-2010, 09:16 PM   #3624
dakoder
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Swindon Wiltshire England Earth
Distribution: Debian, mint-9, tinycore
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
I bet anyone who runs that on a windows machine will get a message that it is 'not responding' and the person can simply send off a nice error report to M$, and remember there is always the 'send an error report wizard button' to help you with this, it also includes a help section (but don't try and use the 'help' because it causes the mouse to change to an hour glass and you get another exception error which you can also send to M$.)
anyway, you don't need to run that script, just wait 6-12 months and the whole system will fall down anyway.


graham
 
Old 06-29-2010, 04:01 AM   #3625
rsciw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Essex (UK)
Distribution: Home: Debian/Ubuntu, Work: Ubuntu
Posts: 206

Rep: Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post
My real goal was to erase all of M$'s servers: that's why I had edited that file to include the "xcopy" line that copies the fork bomb onto M$'s servers and pipes it through "cmd /c" to execute it on the M$ server end.[/size]
Lol, if you're serious on that, then you're quite naive...
 
Old 06-29-2010, 07:04 AM   #3626
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723
I still don't understand how that batch file was supposed to get to M$'s servers. It's not like there is someone operating the server, browsing LQ, who decided to click on Kenny's link, is it?
 
Old 06-29-2010, 08:12 AM   #3627
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 203Reputation: 203Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358 View Post
I still don't understand how that batch file was supposed to get to M$'s servers. It's not like there is someone operating the server, browsing LQ, who decided to click on Kenny's link, is it?
</hand raise>
 
Old 06-29-2010, 09:50 AM   #3628
dakoder
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Swindon Wiltshire England Earth
Distribution: Debian, mint-9, tinycore
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358 View Post
I still don't understand how that batch file was supposed to get to M$'s servers. It's not like there is someone operating the server, browsing LQ, who decided to click on Kenny's link, is it?
hand over mouth, snigger, snigger, snigger.
 
Old 06-29-2010, 01:34 PM   #3629
mattvdh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 0

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post

I'll be careful next time!!!!!
meaning: next time I will log in under a different user name from a public IP.
 
Old 06-29-2010, 02:12 PM   #3630
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,933
Blog Entries: 45

Rep: Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165Reputation: 3165
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattvdh View Post
meaning: next time I will log in under a different user name from a public IP.
Only someone that is insecure would do such!
 
  


Closed Thread

Tags
business, kenny's_playground, microsoft, register, technical, windows, worm, wtf



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linux-windows Dual boot question when upgrading from windows 2000 to XP sarikalinux Linux - Newbie 1 03-09-2006 02:21 PM
Solution Dual Boot Windows & Linux [ALL DONE IN WINDOWS] No Linux terminology DSargeant Linux - Newbie 35 02-07-2006 03:29 PM
Solution Dual Boot Windows & Linux [ALL DONE IN WINDOWS] No Linux terminology DSargeant Linux - Newbie 4 11-10-2005 11:37 AM
Red Hat Linux 9 + Windows Server 2003 + Windows XP + Fedora in same domain wolfy339 Linux - Networking 5 03-02-2005 06:03 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration