LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Password
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2006, 12:20 AM   #166
seashell11
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu Maverick
Posts: 86

Rep: Reputation: 16

I have been running linux Ubuntu for about 5 months now, I even convinced my mom and brother to let me change their computers over! But I just got done switching them all to the kde desktop, and I love it compared to gnome. Just a simple
Code:
sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop
and I can start up with either gnome or kde. Then I install kdm, because I decided to switch totally over to kde and if you arn't using the kde login manager kde won't give you a shutdown menu, just a end session option.
 
Old 01-13-2006, 04:57 AM   #167
apenguinlinux
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: debian
Posts: 91

Rep: Reputation: 15
Hi Dear Can u tell me How we can install ubuntu remotly like i have redhat box and i want install directly from net on Redhat box .

How will i do ?

in Debian we can do easily.

how will you do this?

Thanks
Deepak


Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisstooss
I ve been useing Ubunt for almost 6 month. And I must say its pretty good distro. No no I s a best distro I ve ever tasted.

Likes:

I like that all of my hardware was detected imidietly after I installed Ubuntu even dialup modem which didnt work even in windows XP
I like that I have only one aplication used for one job i.e. FF for intenet Rhythmbox for listening the music etc.
I like that none of installed programs crashed (when I was useing GNOME)
I like GNOME very much
I like brown color of desktop
I like www.tuxme.com where you can find two articles where author goes through installation and tweaking the sistem
I like www.ubuntuforums.org. Those guys realy helped me when something wrong hapened
I like Ubuntu for real
I like synaptic
I like what names where where given to version of Ubuntu Warty Hoary. Hoary is my favorite beacause it has FF 1.0 inscudet
I really like that it is only around 14 days till next relese 5.04

Dislikes

I dont like that I dont have codecs for divx or mp3 playing installed. I know that they are avalible in repositoriums. But I would be realy happy if they were included

I dont like rhythmbox. I dont know why. Long time I was Win user and there I was useing Winamp. So my choice for music player is XMMS
I dont like XMMS. Beacause of all the bugs included
I hate when Xine crashes
I hate beacause GUI mplayer must be compiled and do NOT come in repositoriums
I dislike tha t OOo 2.0 pre are not included in Ubuntu 5.04 prewiev edition

So you see that all of my dislikes goes to software that are not part of offical ditribution but can be acessed in synaptic. Last dislike is not problem for one who has dsl connection. But for me with dial-up and 0.5 KB/s download can take avile to download

Ubuntu rox

You have to check www.ubuntuguide.org. Its THE BEST GUIDE FOR STARTERS or does ones who are allredy good in linux. Here you can find everything. And I mean EVERYTHING.

I am now runing Ubuntu mini ram installation with ICEWM for WM beacause I have only 128 MB RAM and FF startes to freeze when I had Gnome installed. The other choice, other then gnome, is XFCE. You can find tutorial hovv to install xfce on Ubuntu linux at TUXME in articles section.

Godspeed ubuntu
 
Old 01-13-2006, 07:40 PM   #168
tomdkat
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04 AMD64
Posts: 595

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well, this has certainly been a fascinating thread to read.

I'm a long time Linux user who currently uses a Slackware 8 based system that I've manually updated over the past few years I've been running it at home. My first Linux distro was a Slackware 3.x distro that was floppy based (and I STILL have some of the old Slack floppies! ).

Anywho, I've been looking for a distro I could recommend to people currently running Windows who are frustrated with it. I've been using live CDs to "audition" various distros and I've had some interesting results. Ubuntu 'feels' pretty good as a distro and I've almost decided to make that the distro I recommend to people. I have Mandriva 10.1 (I believe, or at least it's a very recent release if not the current release) installed on a 80GB HDD just to see how it felt. It was ok but not something I would want to recommend to anyone.

Ubuntu's hardware detection is good, but not necessarily great. I say that since the live CDs I've played with (versions 5.04 and 5.10) have both not detected some integrated hardware devices (like NICs) on some PCs I've booted them on. Perhaps an actual installation would be different.

I've found the comments posted in this thread interesting since I always like to know what kinds of things people expect from Linux.

I've got no problem with people sticking with Windows instead of using Linux since Linux isn't for everyone. It works well for me, which is why I continue to use it at home (on a PII 350MHz w/ 196MB of RAM). If Windows works for you, more power to ya. I've had some very frustrating Linux experiences and extremely frustrating Windows experiences, so I can appreciate both sides of that argument. To the person who worked on the Windows XP box with no firewall and no anti-virus software, 7 viruses is nothing. I worked on a machine similar to what you described and found 897 objects of spyware in Ad-Aware, 440+ items in Spybot and as Spybot "tripped" over something, the anti-virus software I installed (I think I purchased Norton Anti-Virus for them) got invoked as it detected I forget how many viruses. That was quite the experience. After getting everything all cleaned up, the Windows box was fine. It's when I do these kinds of jobs that I boot my Linux live CD to see if Linux would run on the machine I'm working on.

Windows does "just work" but at a certain cost and a cost most are willing to pay. Nothing wrong with that.

To those having problems with gFTP, keep in mind these distros come with third-party apps and sometimes the distro maintainers will make source changes to the apps and sometimes they won't. So, gFTP problems won't necessarily be distro specific as much as they are gFTP specific. There was a version of gFTP that had a problem where a byte or two would NOT be transferred (either sent or received) resulting in corrupt files. I reported this to the author and he fixed the problem. I encountered this on my home machine that didn't come with gFTP and I built it from source.

For the other Slackware fans, I can understand your points about learning more about how the underlying OS works but in this day and age I think computing trends are heading in the opposite direction. Not having to know much about your computer (at least internals or underling OS) is the direction we're heading in. For the hobbyist who wants to learn that stuff, that's cool.. go for it. However, for those who don't care to know that stuff, the systems they use should "just work" as well. Windows isn't perfect in this regard but it's a good reference point since so many people are familiar with it.

As for my likes/dislikes about Ubuntu, overall I think it's a good distro. It's easy to use even though I would appreciate an improved wireless adapter configuration utility. I booted my Kubuntu live CD on a laptop I worked on earlier this week to diagnose a wireless networking problem and found I had to manually specify the SSID and passphrase to connect to an access point and I didn't know if WPA was supported or not, etc. I would have preferred a graphical "wizard" or something to walk me through configuring the wireless connection or at least show me which access points were in range. I was never able to get the Atheros 5100x (I forget the actual model) wireless adapter working. ath0 was listed as a device but I could not get it enabled. Maybe with an actual Unbuntu install (instead of using the live CD) that would have been different.

I do have a GOOD story about Ubunutu, though. I was working on a Dell Dimension 2350 system that had crashed. I re-installed a vanilla Windows XP Home Edition OS on the box since it was running XP before. Low and behold, after the first reboot after the install I had 640x480 video, no audio, and no Internet access since the NIC wasn't supported. I had none of the Dell drivers. So, I booted my Ubuntu CD and it detected the video card, audio card, and NIC and I was able to download XP drivers from Dell which I stored on my USB Zip drive that I brought with me. I then booted XP again and it DID provide USB support so I could install the drivers and get the system operational again. Ubuntu saved the day!

Oh yeah, one more thing before I close:

SMB <> Samba

Samba implements SMB, as others have already stated.

Peace...
 
Old 01-15-2006, 07:08 PM   #169
fwoodruff
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pompano beach,fl.
Distribution: ubuntu 5.10
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
ubuntu 5.10

Well I used suse 10.0,did not like it,i used ubuntu before,debian does not work,ubuntu 5.10 breezy works just fine for me I have not had any trouble with it,I can not take the microsoft crape any more,I like the ubuntu,I will stick with it,it does not have all the whistles and bells XP has but so what,it does not have all the B.S. that XP has either,I installed breezy with no problems and intend to keep using ubuntu,cannt wait for the next release next year allready looking forward to it,anyone that is looking for an excellent linux OS i would suggest Ubuntu,it works just fine.
 
Old 02-25-2006, 05:40 AM   #170
greeklegend
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: At a computer
Distribution: Ubuntu 7.04, LFS 6.3 rc1 (living dangerously ;), Windows XP
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm on a dsl connection with a 500mb dl limit. Downloading a distro wasn't really an option, but with Ubuntu's free shipping i decided to order a cd (well my friend ordered a whole box actually).
My intention was to install it on an old computer my dad brought home from work and use it as a counter-strike dedicated server at LAN parties, but after trying Ubuntu out and getting the dedicated server to work I can't wait to find some space in my room to put it in.
It's 800mhz but boots as fast as my 3ghz box running xp pro. It recognized all my hardware without any tweaks, automatically mounted my USB key (also didn't complain when i couldn't get umount to work and just ripped it out) and the support was good. I had problems with a PPPoA connection but a few forums later everything worked fine.
Only downside is no games but with 800mhz and 8mb onboard video not really an option anyway
 
Old 03-05-2006, 03:40 AM   #171
BobNutfield
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Fedora , Ubuntu, Slackware-Current
Posts: 1,526

Rep: Reputation: 53
Just wanted to note my experience with Ubuntu. I am a dedicated Fedora user because it is cutting edge and therefore not the easiest of distros for the noob. I set up a network at home and installed Ubuntu on a PIII 500mhz as a simple desktop for my partner to use (she is not techno minded, though that is only because it bores her.) I had read all the reviews, threads, etc. about how easy it was for the non-super user who just wants an alternative to Windows. However, we needed to share files between the two.

I confess that Ubuntu (5.10) is easy to install, smooth and runs reasonably well on such old specs. She mainly wanted the net and email, so Ubuntu stock package was enough. But, then comes the network setup. Ubuntu is useless for this. It just won't play.

I have NFS and Samba set up on the Fedora box and it talks to all the windows boxes just fine. Not Ubuntu. Will not even recognize the other boxes as being on the network. Ubuntu connects to the net fine on the network and can ping and be pinged, but no dice for the rest of the network setup.

I won't go into everything else I tried on the Ubuntu box to get it on the network (extensive testing), but suffice to say that, as far as my experience, Ubuntu is useless for networking and numerous posts found anyone else with any ideas on how to fix this. It just appears that Ubuntu is "too user friendly" and not meant for serious "under the hood" linux. It is just what is advertises itself to be "Linux for Human Beings." But I certainly cannot recommend it for serious users. I suppose I will spend a couple more days trying to investigate, but in the end it looks like I will end up dumping it for something more serious.

Just my experience.

Bob
 
Old 03-05-2006, 11:56 AM   #172
plungerjoke
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 0
I just installed Kubuntu last night on my PC and I'm running into some troubles with using Ndiswrapper. To be fair, I'm having these troubles in every other distro except for mandriva, but its still quite annoying.


I would say that Mandriva would be the best newb distro out there though, mainly because I am a newb and its the only one that I've been able to configure a well oiled internet enabled machine with.
 
Old 03-05-2006, 02:15 PM   #173
plungerjoke
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 0
I forgot to say though,
While trying out other distros, I've noticed that they run quite a bit faster than Mandriva. It doesnt run obnoxiously slow or anything, probably about the same as my PC was during my late windows XP days, but its still frustrating to not be able to use a flavor of linux that runs better.
 
Old 03-05-2006, 03:54 PM   #174
smiley_lauf
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: NY
Distribution: Fedora 15 x64
Posts: 344

Rep: Reputation: 30
Why Ubuntu (GNOME)? Simply: extensive simple to follow documentation and wiki (visually appealing as well). All command lines given to you straight from the horses mouth. Just cut and paste...it jsut works! Setup out of box in minutes (including multimedia support). Lightening fast distro, minimal resource usage. excellent hardware detection (excellent acpi control for laptops). Dapper is a looker!

Why not ubuntu? (actually, applies to all Linux distro equally): printing issues, printer setup, drivers, settings, etc.
 
Old 03-07-2006, 06:04 AM   #175
AtinLango
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 41

Rep: Reputation: 15
I like Ubuntu so so much its become a hobby of sorts.

But I hate it with a passion for one thing: it has refused to recognize my Huawei ETS2077 wireless modem. Its a pain in the neck if you have to reboot the computer just so that you can access internet in Windows. Imagine how many times in a day I reboot my PC.
 
Old 03-08-2006, 06:14 AM   #176
torger
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 137

Rep: Reputation: 15
Ubuntu is the first version of linux I tried and I have have just swapped from windows. I have been able to get around install games and use it. I don't know what the other distros are like but Ubunu works fine for me.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I messed up real bad. gayxdanny Fedora 7 02-25-2006 03:08 PM
Suse 9.2 Pro Eval edition install: Good, bad, and ugly HawkeyeCoug SUSE / openSUSE 3 03-18-2005 07:58 PM
ati x300 - good, bad or ugly? noeffred Linux - Hardware 1 03-05-2005 05:34 PM
the good the bad and the ugly on dual boot oracsol Linux - Newbie 4 12-10-2003 08:34 PM
real beginer - need help bad sofi Linux - Software 3 08-25-2002 08:17 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration