UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been unable to find a suitable explanation as to why Ubuntu 11.10 (and presumably others) runlevel is 2 (two). This is very confusing. I'm unsure if it has anything to do with the move to 'upstart.' For over a decade, on numerous unices I recognized 2 as 'MULTI user with NO networking'
If you have a brief explanation or some links to share I'd really appreciate it.
It's a Debian thing. In Debian, runlevels 2-5 are all the same--multi-user graphical.
I use the sysv-rc-conf program (it's in the Debian repos) on my Debian box to configure runlevel 3 so I can boot to a terminal, as is the right and proper order of things (grin).
This does explain what this particular linux distro uses as a default, multi-user, networked runlevel. But it does not explain why. I've searched around some more but can't find an
explanation beyond 'debian treats 2-5 as same'
It has sent me into a several hours of trying to determine 1) if something is wrong 2) why there is difference between many other unices.
Why Debian chose to do it their is likely a mystery lost in the mists of time.
Joking aside, I suspect that somewhere along the line the Debian community decided that all-GUI was the best way to go for the future. I wouldn't read anything more complicated than that into it.
If you uninstall the Graphical Display Manager, Debian reverts to more traditional behavior. I preferred to find a way to keep the GDM available and still have a traditional runlevel 3.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.