UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
How do I start a second X session? (specifically, Enlightenment from the PPA?) Most my life I've used classic *BSD and Slackware, the only strictly Unix-like Linux, and it's easy on those.
I read that since Ubuntu 16.04 you can't start a second X session, but that's not true, right?
Don't tell me it is, because that would be Windows-like, not Unix-like.
I only temporarily need Kubuntu for AMDGPU-PRO until other OSes support that, but I'd like to be able to explore Enlightenment window manager...
First (not in X) 'xinit /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.enlightenment -- /usr/bin/X :1' (X server refuses.)
Next, 'xinit /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.enlightenment -- /usr/bin/X :1 vt2' (permanently crashes first X session.)
Wat do you think? You need to give enough information to be able to help you. I have no idea about your system, I have no idea about your knowledge and also I have no idea what have you tried, what did you expect and what's happened. I do not really understand implied answers.
So again if you gave no real information I will not give you real answer. http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-q...html#beprecise
I can't tell you how can you fix your issue because at this moment I have no idea what should be fixed....
And finally, it works for me. I fixed it in line 54.
Wat do you think? You need to give enough information to be able to help you. I have no idea about your system, I have no idea about your knowledge and also I have no idea what have you tried, what did you expect and what's happened [...]
That's not true.
Quote:
And finally, it works for me. I fixed it in line 54.
You're the only being vague in this thread. Reread what you linked.
Remember, I do not want to solve it at all. It is not my problem. But Probably I can give you some hints if you explain exactly what did you try.
Your last post contains no additional information.
Remember, I do not want to solve it at all. It is not my problem. But Probably I can give you some hints if you explain exactly what did you try.
Your last post contains no additional information.
I did that four posts ago and gave other information before you asked, that you keep asking about... the fact that it's easy--personal experience--such as I've done it on this PC with another GNU/Linux OS distribution, so the PC has the resources. It's not like you need the specifications or need to know how long I've studied.
None of your posts contain any information.
Since I already stated a lot, I have nothing more to say... just waiting for someone who's actually helpful to reply.
There's no information in this.
Do not post if you have nothing to add; it's against LQ rules.Reported.
Also necrobumping is heavily frowned upon.
What you maybe didn't see is the question was mine originally, but many *ubuntu people have nothing to add. This is still an open question (not 'necrobumping'--if you say so, where's the newer thread with the solution? I would've been interested until minutes before indicating I was no longer interested) but I'm not following this now, partly because no one had anything to add in the entire thread (so have uninstalled that OS distribution (distro) I only needed for display drivers I'm not currently using and that better distros have now.)
Does that mean I should mark it solved, or would that trick people into looking for a nonexistent helpful answer? (my solution: backup, 'rm -rf /' as root, switch to something strictly Unix[-like.])
Of course, if it was reliable to turn off booting to X/etc. in *ubuntu (apparently it isn't... sometimes only in that case you get a pure console shell prompt but it's frozen) my original solution works. I'd seen some people thanked me because I'd detailed that solution (which the first person replying didn't believe was detailed enough, but it is.)
People, try to listen more to what people describe when they ask: if someone said they've already run two X sessions on their PC, don't say you think they probably suddenly don't have the hardware able to do that, so then the thread stops and gets lost after many zero-reply threads with the person asking waiting for years (what happened here.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.