UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
About to load Kubuntu on a separate drive from SuSE 9.2. When I've done this in the past, I've run in to problems with the OS going on to the desired drive but the bootloader overwriting the bootloader of the other OS on the other drive. With SuSE and Fedora, on install there are settings that let you confirm where the bootloader will go.
Does Ubuntu allow you to confirm where the bootloader will go during the install? I want to keep the OS's and bootloaders completely separate, only switching between them but flipping the drive that will boot in the bios.
I've looked at the OSDir screenshots of Ubuntu, but that didn't help me.
Distribution: Mac OS X 10.6.4 "Snow Leopard", Win 7, Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 322
Rep:
It's been awhile since I installed Ubuntu, but I am pretty sure you can. You can manually type in where you want it to write the BL to, just like in debian install.
Distribution: Dual booting Mandrake 10 and SUSE 9.1
Posts: 44
Rep:
If you disconect the drive with SUSE9.2 on it and connect the other drive and load Ubuntu on that and then have both drives connected will that get you what you want?
Yes, disconnecting drives is the cleanest method for this, as it ensures the bootloader can't get thrown on the other drive.
In my case, it worked out. I had SuSE 9.2 and the bootloader on my hdb drive. So, I was loading Ubuntu on the hda drive. It automatically wants to put the bootloader on the MBR of hda. So, it was fine to let it do that. Ubuntu also recognized I had SuSE 9.2 and added it to the hda bootloader, as well, which is handy.
I can confirm there was an option to reject putting the bootloader on the mbr of hda. But, I did not select 'no' so I didn't see options beyond that.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.